E
edwest2
Guest
What do you know about this statement? Pope John Paul II refered to theories, not just one.
God bless,
Ed
- Status
God bless,
Ed
B
buffalo
Guest
The Altenberg 16 is propaganda?
You can read the quotes from the top evo’s themselves. Stuart Newman Interview - good stuff at the end.
M
Moonstruck888
Guest
Or I could just end this grotesque charade now and stop wasting my time, and for that matter save you from wasting any more on yours with this desultory meandering go round that is going nowhere.
B
buffalo
Guest
Well then the lurkers can benefit. Bye bye,
R
rossum
Guest
I did: final statement emerging from the Altenberg workshop, agreed upon by all 16 participants.
To quote:By incorporating these new results and insights into our understanding of evolution, we believe that the explanatory power of evolutionary theory is greatly expanded within biology and beyond. As is the nature of science, some of the new ideas will stand the test of time, while others will be significantly modified. Nonetheless, there is much justified excitement in evolutionary biology these days. This is a propitious time to engage the scientific community in a vast interdisciplinary effort to further our understanding of how life evolves.
Signed…
rossum
G
grannymh
Guest
Thank you.
I have a general understanding of the Out of Africa theory and am very interested in the particulars. The debate is on-going. Some new evidence may bring back the Multiregional theory.
:slapfight:
As you know, a variety of hominid species lived during various periods, so I expected that you were going to present more detailed information about one since you knew the description – “ugly squat hunchbacks”.
Obviously, I am very interested in actual research papers concerning pre-human history.
Blessings,
granny
Human life is sacred.
M
Moonstruck888
Guest
There are many available. Happy reading.Thank you.
I have a general understanding of the Out of Africa theory and am very interested in the particulars. The debate is on-going. Some new evidence may bring back the Multiregional theory.
:slapfight:
As you know, a variety of hominid species lived during various periods, so I expected that you were going to present more detailed information about one since you knew the description – ugly squat hunchbacks.
Obviously, I am very interested in actual research papers concerning pre-human history.
Blessings,
granny
Human life is sacred.
S
StAnastasia
Guest
Buffalo, the Alternburg 16 were evolutionary biologists and philosophers of science, not YECs or IDers. They do not help ID:
"The new concepts include (but are not limited to): evolvability, developmental plasticity, phenotypic and genetic accommodation, punctuated evolution, phenotypic innovation, facilitated variation, epigenetic inheritance, and multi-level selection.
By incorporating these new results and insights into our understanding of evolution, we believe that the explanatory power of evolutionary theory is greatly expanded within biology and beyond. As is the nature of science, some of the new ideas will stand the test of time, while others will be significantly modified. Nonetheless, there is much justified excitement in evolutionary biology these days. This is a propitious time to engage the scientific community in a vast interdisciplinary effort to further our understanding of how life evolves."
G
grannymh
Guest
Which do you recommend? Which would you say is your favorite?
M
Moonstruck888
Guest
This sounds unpleasantly like a little game you’re playing with me. I’m not going to rise to the bait.
Good day to you.
B
buffalo
Guest
and…
Code:
We do have wars about some of the aspects of science. And one of the reasons we have these wars is because people are being asked to accept implausible and incorrect mechanisms.
If better ideas of how evolution occurred get out into the wider culture, there will be more of an acceptance of the phenomenon of evolution. People will stop fighting about whether evolution happened, which is a ridiculous fight. And it’s partly a ridiculous fight because of religion. The other side is because of science. Because the science is not where it should be.
S
StAnastasia
Guest
This does not in any way support so-called “Intelligent Design” or your fabricated term “IDvolution.”
G
grannymh
Guest
Way back, a poster respectfully had my head on a platter because I tried to get by without doing my science homework. Not only was the lesson learned, but I fell in love with the way modern natural science works. My apology. I was hoping you would share some of your “homework” sources.
Blessings,
granny
Human life is sacred.
B
buffalo
Guest
Do you think these guys are going to come out and say it outright?
If one follows the latest science and puts it together the trend is clear.
Most of the peer reviewed papers and science links I post together with our Catholic faith we get IDvolution.
B
buffalo
Guest
Are there any terms in the English language NOT fabricated by someone? Perhaps you think evolution popped them into existence. If you are attempting to diss me - good luck. Won’t happen…
S
StAnastasia
Guest
Of course not – they’re not IDers!
What science is that?
Tens of thousands of peer reviewed papers are published each year. Are you suggesting that most of these support IDvolution? Is there evidence to support your claim?
B
buffalo
Guest
Read it again carefully. The evidence is in the papers.
S
StAnastasia
Guest
OK, then please digest the evidence and present it to us if you can. Show us how biology leads us ineluctably to “intelligent design.”
B
buffalo
Guest
I have but you have been ignoring it and proclaiming the evolutionary dogma.
S
StAnastasia
Guest
Show it to us in your own words, not by referring us to websites. Show clearly why evolution is an inadequate explanation for biodiversity, ans why “IDvolution” is both possible and necessary.
- Status