S
Special_Ed
Guest
Either you are not familiar enough with the Protestant view of prophecy, or you are not reading my post closely enough to follow and understand why I would use the term revived “Grecian” empire as opposed to revived Roman empire. The translation you believe and accept actually fuels and supports the Proteatant view that the future beast would come from papal Rome. I would think that Catholic’s would welcome and be willing to consider and study an interpretation that may exposes the truth about the origin of the beast as well as expose the prejudices that remain in the Proteatant views of prophecy.“revived Grecian Empire?” You are forcing this idea into Scripture when it isn’t there.
I am letting the words in their original languages do the “forcing” or the work, for me. In every instance, you avoided confrontation on the use of those words because they refute your theories. The Word of God by Himself exposes the errors in any theory by the original words used in those Holy Scriptures. The Word has exposed contradiction after contradiction in yours, as well as the Proteatant theory of prophecy, simply be the words used in those scriptures. And like most of the others, you will likely remain in denial of the truth until the events begin to prove you wrong. You are actually blessed to be living in these times even though turbulent times are coming.
Why the 2,000 + year time warp in verses 41 and 42 with no mention of the Messiah the Israelites were looking for?
I never said that. I’ve already said that that’s what the Protestant’s believe but not I. That’s why I wonder how well your reading my replies.
It sounds like you are reasoning that two kingdoms that happen to be in the same geographical area, can be considered, for prophetic purposes, one and the same kingdom (even if they are separated by milleniaThe text itself teaches that these two Greek parts are one and the same kingdom.
I know that’s what you believe but you haven’t at all confronted or tried to debate the reasons why this is implied in those verses. You give me very little solid, discernible evidence to support your theory, and very little solid, discerible evidence to refute mine.
Peace,IMHO this reasoning stretches logic to the breaking point.
I agree and no longer wish to discuss things anymore on this thread.
God bless,
SE