The Overwatch Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phage0070
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What I consider does not imply what it means to God.
Ahh, so it isn’t the 2nd premise per se, it is that God isn’t subject to the same standard of morality as humans. In that case you are really saying God isn’t ethical (by the common use of the word).
 
Ahh, so it isn’t the 2nd premise per se, it is that God isn’t subject to the same standard of morality as humans. In that case you are really saying God isn’t ethical (by the common use of the word).
Why do you insist on putting words in my mouth?

God is the source of morality. He is objectively moral. Any understanding you have that indicates otherwise is due to a flaw in you understanding or reasoning.
 
It doesn’t have to be numerical, but you need some criteria to declare success.
The purpose of posting here is to incite discussion. Success!
Self definition.
Which is an entirely different meaning than its usage in any other context.
My point is that God is further above man than man is above the flies. The ethics of one can not be applied to the other.
Then you would agree that by human standards God is unethical, but further argue that human standards of morality don’t apply. I can understand that position, but few theists would support such a distinction. Their view of God most often has him being moral based on the same standard as humans are held.
Apologetics is explaining the faith to others.
Explaining the faith to others is evangelism. Defending the faith through the systematic use of reason is apologetics.
 
God is the source of morality. He is objectively moral.
In what sense exactly? You say that humans are held to one moral code and God adheres to another, and yet you use the term “moral” as though it was a meaningful comparison between the two standards.
 
The purpose of posting here is to incite discussion. Success!
To what end?
Then you would agree that by human standards God is unethical, but further argue that human standards of morality don’t apply. I can understand that position, but few theists would support such a distinction. Their view of God most often has him being moral based on the same standard as humans are held.
You twist every statement to say what you want it to say. Doing that will not help anyone in understanding. Everything God does is ethical. His is the “gold” standard. If you think he’s unethical its because your own perception of ethics is flawed.
Explaining the faith to others is evangelism. Defending the faith through the systematic use of reason is apologetics.
I don’t understand the distinction between explainign the faith and defending the faith through reason. In any case, you are looking for neither. What do you really want. You haven’t said
 
In what sense exactly?
Since you are on a Catholic forum, I strongly suggest that you use the meanings of terms the way the Church defines them.

CCC said:
1950 The moral law is the work of divine Wisdom. Its biblical meaning can be defined as fatherly instruction, God’s pedagogy. It prescribes for man the ways, the rules of conduct that lead to the promised beatitude; it proscribes the ways of evil which turn him away from God and his love. It is at once firm in its precepts and, in its promises, worthy of love.

Please consider reading what follows here.
You say that humans are held to one moral code and God adheres to another, and yet you use the term “moral” as though it was a meaningful comparison between the two standards.
I didn’t say that, why do you think i did?
 
The uncovering of new ideas and perspectives. Why do you participate in these discussions, is it simply an opportunity to browbeat and indoctrinate?

So anything God does is ethical for a human to do as well?
Do you think so?

Why?
 
Since you are on a Catholic forum, I strongly suggest that you use the meanings of terms the way the Church defines them.
I wasn’t aware that the Catholic church defined God as following a separate moral code than humans.
I didn’t say that, why do you think i did?
You seem to be saying that humans are ethically required to prevent evil actions when they are able, but God is not subject to that ethical imperative. Do you agree so far?

Assuming the previous, God adheres to a separate moral code than humans. In most cases when we talk about something being “ethical” we are referring to the human context, so if we are going to jump between moral codes when referring to God we need to define the transfer explicitly. Otherwise when identifying an action as ethically required, and God as being ethical, there will be confusion when God doesn’t consider it to be required.
 
I wasn’t aware that the Catholic church defined God as following a separate moral code than humans.

You seem to be saying that humans are ethically required to prevent evil actions when they are able, but God is not subject to that ethical imperative. Do you agree so far?

Assuming the previous, God adheres to a separate moral code than humans. In most cases when we talk about something being “ethical” we are referring to the human context, so if we are going to jump between moral codes when referring to God we need to define the transfer explicitly. Otherwise when identifying an action as ethically required, and God as being ethical, there will be confusion when God doesn’t consider it to be required.
Based on this response you must not have read the material at the link I provided. Until you do, you cannot begin to understand our responses.

If you continue to insist on twisting what we say you won’t be doing any “uncovering of new ideas and perspectives”.
 
Do you think so?

Why?
I don’t know. The terminology used about God being ethical and good seems to indicate that that is the case, but God doesn’t seem to behave like ethics would demand a human.
 
Based on this response you must not have read the material at the link I provided. Until you do, you cannot begin to understand our responses.
Most people don’t require 3000+ words of religious dogma and the associated study to understand the nuances involved (and I am sure there are nuances and interpretations galore) in order to convey their meaning. Perhaps a simple yes or no question will be easier for you to communicate effectively.

Does God follow the same standard of ethics which apply to humans? (Answer Key: Yes, No, I don’t know)
 
Most people don’t require 3000+ words of religious dogma and the associated study to understand the nuances involved (and I am sure there are nuances and interpretations galore) in order to convey their meaning. Perhaps a simple yes or no question will be easier for you to communicate effectively.

Does God follow the same standard of ethics which apply to humans? (Answer Key: Yes, No, I don’t know)
How could it? Ethics are rules that apply to actions in specific situations. God and Man are never in the same situation.
 
Phage,

Are you here to try to make Catholics question their faith or their understanding of God. If so, I wonder why you would want to do that? and why you think you would gain any traction on a Catholic web site.

On the other hand, if you are personally struggling with the question of the nature of God, we can help you with that, but there are better ways than the path you have this thread on to accomplish that.

Give us some guidance on what you are really looking to do so we can either really help, or disengage…

And by the way, we are here to answer questions that people have about the Catholic faith. Remember, you came to us, not the other way around.
 
St. Paul on just how wise we really are…not

1st Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Corinthians Ch 1 v 17-30

[17] For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not in wisdom of speech, lest the cross of Christ should be made void. [18] For the word of the cross, to them indeed that perish, is foolishness; but to them that are saved, that is, to us, it is the power of God. [19] For it is written: I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the prudence of the prudent I will reject. [20] Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

[21] For seeing that in the wisdom of God the world, by wisdom, knew not God, it pleased God, by the foolishness of our preaching, to save them that believe. [22] For both the Jews require signs, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: [23] But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews indeed a stumblingblock, and unto the Gentiles foolishness: [24] But unto them that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. [25] For the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

[26] For see your vocation, brethren, that there are not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble: [27] But the foolish things of the world hath God chosen, that he may confound the wise; and the weak things of the world hath God chosen, that he may confound the strong. [28] And the base things of the world, and the things that are contemptible, hath God chosen, and things that are not, that he might bring to nought things that are: [29] That no flesh should glory in his sight. [30] But of him are you in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and justice, and sanctification, and redemption:

Does God follow the same standard of ethics which apply to humans? (Answer Key: Yes, No, I don’t know)

God permitted the greatest evil in history, the crucifiction of His own Son, to bring about the greatest good in history, mans reconciliation with Himself. it took God to be sacrificed to God to get this done, no human was, is, or will ever be worthy or pure enough to pay that sacrifice… so I answer Yes, God follows the same standard of ethics which apply to humans…God applied that standard to us Himself, and unlike
Him, we struggle to keep it.

peace
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top