S
SouthpawLink
Guest
Do you doubt the accuracy of the quotes in the linked article?
I always assumed that we are bound to believe the teachings on faith and morals in the Catechism, but other odds and ends such as 841, for example, were not necessarily required.
Early Christmas morning I caught the beginning of this thread, and my jaw dropped to the floor. lol I did a quick search on the internet and found a discussion on this topic that seemed to confirm that Catholics must indeed accept 841 on penalty of sin.
amnation.com/vfr/archives/007512.html
I also assumed that Lumen Gentium was dogmatic as the title states: “Dogmatic Constitution on the Church: Lumen Gentium”, so by taking quotes from this and inserting into the Catechism, it would seem to be binding?
I did more digging and found this:
en.allexperts.com/q/Catholics-955/Vatican-II-2.htm
“What conclusion, therefore, can be drawn about the authority of Vatican II? That, according to the two popes of the council, it was merely pastoral in nature and is not to be accorded the authority of the essential Magisterium of the Church. In holding that understanding, Catholics are simply obeying the words of the two popes themselves. Vatican II, therefore, as a pastoral council, has no dogmatic force, and can be held to be imprudent or even in error, with no compromise to one’s Catholic faith.”
Hopefully, if this is accurate, it can bring a much needed sigh of relief.
Reuben,I’d be not so much as repulsed or disturbed by CCC841 but rather in a selfish way irritated by this inclusion because it means I have to defend and spend unnecessarily much time to explain it. But I’d consider it insignificant and a minor aspect of Catholic teaching. It will not change my opinion whatsoever on Catholicism simply based on this one teaching.
What I can gather from this one stance of the CCC is that it has a stance regarding Islam. No matter how difficult it is to stomach this stance, I think I would go along with it rather than the alternative, that is, keep silent on the issue or stating downright that it is from the Devil and that Allah is not the same as Christian God.
As had been explained, 841 simply echoes what Muslims themselves claim to believe and that the One God that they worship is the Creator. In that it is the truth. The rest should not bring confusion to Catholics as we know very well the differences between our belief and them. We can also say that their knowledge of the One God is not complete and there are factual errors in their belief.
The reality in Islam is that there are truth, half-truth and downright lies. 841 does not address this however. The CCC simply teaches us on how to approach them, that is, we have to engage them and not confrontation. I think this is in the spirit of what St. Francis of Assisi did when he preached to the Saracens and Muslims sultan. Rather than fighting with them he engaged them. He did not seem to succeed though but as Christians we have no choice but to take this approach.
God bless.
Reuben
St. Francis had a desire to be martyed. He not only engaged them but challenged them.I think this is in the spirit of what St. Francis of Assisi did when he preached to the Saracens and Muslims sultan. Rather than fighting with them he engaged them. He did not seem to succeed though but as Christians we have no choice but to take this approach.
Aww Matey!Just an update for all my friends in the non-Catholic religions section, many of you know my grandma has suffered from cancer and a series of strokes. She has been left utterly crippled, virtually comatose, dying in a horrible manner for weeks and weeks now. I went over to visit her today until around 4:30pm. I got the painful phone call from my mom tonight at 6:30pm that she passed away.
We have a VERY small family. It’s basically made up of me, my parents, and grandma and grandpa since I was a kid. Now there’s my wife and three kids. But my family is TINY. Few branches on our tree. Now there’s one less limb. I really miss her. Hearing the phone call just made me wail and fall apart. I was devastated. My grandma’s name is Mary. Please, friends, keep my mom, Sally, grandpa, Glen, and grandma in your prayers. It’s been a lousy day…God bless you all
Regarding the bold: Is it really true that statements we make about God (who/what He is, who/what He is not…that sort of thing) can ever really qualify as “minor”? I mean, especially in the Catechism, we are seeking a clear exposition of the Christian faith, right? And that must include statements about God that we are to view as anything but “minor” if we are serious about our faith. I am sorry, Reuben, but if statements like “(Muslims) together with us adore the one true God” strike you as minor, then I dunno what to say…if that’s the sort of attitude imbued in Catholics as a result of following the Catechism and the Catholic teachings followed therein, then I am really glad I left the Church, because it certainly doesn’t strike me as being serious about the Christian faith.I’d be not so much as repulsed or disturbed by CCC841 but rather in a selfish way irritated by this inclusion because it means I have to defend and spend unnecessarily much time to explain it. But I’d consider it insignificant and a minor aspect of Catholic teaching. It will not change my opinion whatsoever on Catholicism simply based on this one teaching.
I think saying that statements like CCC 841 are “from the devil” would be a bit too hysterical for my taste. I’d prefer it if it were the result of some well-meaning but naive and false ecumenical spirit, but since I didn’t write the Catechism any such speculation isn’t going to amount to much either way. The second statement is definitely right, though. Islam’s Allah is not God. I don’t know why it’s so hard to accept that when Islam itself goes out of its way to say that we are worshiping a false God (or rather, we have made a false God out of Jesus Christ). Do I need to find that “Oh, Cross-Worshipers” video again? It’s a recitation of a poem that is north of 500 years old and has the same tired arguments we’ve been hearing from Islam for 1400 years, and yet the Catechism boldly ignores what Muslims themselves have been saying since the birth of their heretical religion by claiming that they somehow “together with us” worship the same God! I guess the Vatican knows Islam better than Muslims do? Or maybe, just maybe, the Vatican and hence most Catholics are in complete denial of what it is they’re praising and seeking illusory “common ground” with.What I can gather from this one stance of the CCC is that it has a stance regarding Islam. No matter how difficult it is to stomach this stance, I think I would go along with it rather than the alternative, that is, keep silent on the issue or stating downright that it is from the Devil and that Allah is not the same as Christian God.
What is the point of that? There are two ways to read this statement, and they both stink to high heaven:As had been explained, 841 simply echoes what Muslims themselves claim to believe and that the One God that they worship is the Creator. In that it is the truth.
Horseshoes and hand-grenades, my friend. “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes through the Father except through me” seems to be perverted once Islam comes up. Why? Jesus said it. I believe it. I think you HAVE to believe it to be a Christian. Jesus said that, not “I am the way and the truth and the life, unless you disagree for some reason.”The rest should not bring confusion to Catholics as we know very well the differences between our belief and them. We can also say that their knowledge of the One God is not complete and there are factual errors in their belief.
The reality is that a half-truth is a whole lie. It is not good enough when discussing matters of God and the true religion (Christianity).The reality in Islam is that there are truth, half-truth and downright lies.
So it shouldn’t be in the Catechism. There is no reason for it to be there.841 does not address this however.
There is a misconception, it seems, among those in this thread who hold CCC 841 to be a true and useful statement that anything that dissents from it is by its very nature aggressive and perhaps un-Christian. Frankly, that’s BS. I’ve posted this elsewhere, but since it fits here too, perhaps those who are holding that only overly warm’n’fuzzy relations with Islam are the way to evangelize Muslims ought to read The Case of the Monk of Bêt Hãlê and a Muslim Emir (the earliest Syriac text to dispute Islam on apologetic grounds). It is certainly a model for engagement that does not compromise the truth of God for anything. I would be perfectly fine if future printings of the CCC would replace the awful heresy of CCC 841 with excerpts from it instead.The CCC simply teaches us on how to approach them, that is, we have to engage them and not confrontation. I think this is in the spirit of what St. Francis of Assisi did when he preached to the Saracens and Muslims sultan. Rather than fighting with them he engaged them. He did not seem to succeed though but as Christians we have no choice but to take this approach.
You are not aloneI concur. I think some Catholics are trying to side-step this passage. Some are saying it’s not infallible, some say it is since it’s in the catechism. Some say it’s much ado about nothing, some try to draw happy-clappy similarities between Islam and Christianity to ease consciences, some try to claim the catechism is giving us apologetics ammo and a way to charitably approach Muslims, some are saying it is actually something we should just shove aside for the greater good. I’m honestly bothered by the way this is treated so lightly. And it is disturbing. Some posters are even saying to just not read this but rather other, older catechisms that are better. This thread shows us that Catholicism isn’t as unified as I have thought and some profess. It is full of opinions and divergent thinking and we can’t even figure out what’s infallible and de fide and what’s not? I’m troubled by this greatly and hope I’m not alone here…![]()
Aww Matey!
My deepest condolences for your loss…from this realm. If a sinner’s prayers have any merit, they are yours and the family’s.
God Bless!
![]()
Shudders…Isn’t that a Michael Jackson tune?![]()
Hi. I have gone through your post and feel that this topic is being dragged into a quagmire for something that it is not. At the risk of sounding condescending and that’s not my intention at all, I would say that you are attacking something that’s not there. So I am not commenting on your opinion about the Church because it is not true; you are merely making a deduction because you have problem with 841. CCC 841 is not about whether Islam is right or not.Regarding the bold: Is it really true that statements we make about God (who/what He is, who/what He is not…that sort of thing) can ever really qualify as “minor”? I mean, especially in the Catechism, we are seeking a clear exposition of the Christian faith, right? And that must include statements about God that we are to view as anything but “minor” if we are serious about our faith. I am sorry, Reuben, but if statements like “(Muslims) together with us adore the one true God” strike you as minor, then I dunno what to say…if that’s the sort of attitude imbued in Catholics as a result of following the Catechism and the Catholic teachings followed therein, then I am really glad I left the Church, because it certainly doesn’t strike me as being serious about the Christian faith.
Thanks. Isn’t that’s what we are called to?St. Francis had a desire to be martyed. He not only engaged them but challenged them.
Thanks for acknowledging my post.Reuben,
Thank you for your common sense post.
I do hope all our dear friends will read it once more. Consider it, pray about it and move on in peace!Carlan
Opinion is not really one of those “true” or “false” things. Obviously I agree with my opinion on the Catholic Church and its communion (and I have met a few ex-Catholic, now Orthodox Christians who have made similar statements, so I know it’s not just me), but that’s neither here nor there.Hi. I have gone through your post and feel that this topic is being dragged into a quagmire for something that it is not. At the risk of sounding condescending and that’s not my intention at all, I would say that you are attacking something that’s not there. So I am not commenting on your opinion about the Church because it is not true; you are merely making a deduction because you have problem with 841. CCC 841 is not about whether Islam is right or not.
Like Gurney, I am not seeing the “apologetic ammo” (I enjoy this phrase – thanks, Gurney!) that Catholics see in CCC 841. It is quite clearly a declarative statement. I don’t think anyone in this thread has claimed that CCC 841 does not address Islam; the problem is in the manner in which it does so.841 is about **our relationship with the world at large **- our relationship with our separated brethrens, other religions and even non-religions. Catholics would know, if they follow the CCC teaching, on how to carry out this relationship properly. Islam is one of them and in our world it is a reality that needs to be addressed. The CCC addresses that.
Nobody in this thread is suggesting anything like that, and you can disagree with CCC 841 without supporting the idiocy of Mr. Jones. This is a definite misdirect.You see, this is about relationship. In a nutshell the CCC teaches us not to do what **Pastor Jones **did.
And what about St. John Damascene? The unnamed monk of Bet Hale? Why is their model of straightforward, unambiguous statements so terrible? I rather prefer it to JP II.Pope John Paul II showed us in how to deal with Muslims as St Francis of Assisi did too.
I strongly disagree with this analysis, but then you know what they say about opinions…The famous or rather the infamous JP II kissing the Quran is not a sign of weakness but a sign of a person who has that supreme confidence of his own faith that he was able to do that with the Quran – respecting their belief.
Yeah, um…or we can not kiss the Qur’an…there’s always that option, too…Until we can take this attitude we will not make any headway with Muslims.
Why? Why should I pretend like the only options are kissing the Qur’an (metaphorically or literally, to “show respect”) or being a jerk? I don’t like these false dichotomies you are setting up, Rueben. I think they hurt your position, even though I know you are sincere in holding it.Picture this when you talk with a Muslim: One can say, “Your Allah is a Devil and your revelations came from a Devil”. Where does this will lead to?
Again, these are NOT the only options. The option I would choose, not given so far, does not involve what I would see as lying (telling Muslims we worship the same God), but instead involves telling the truth about Christ and Christianity. Note that this does not require me to make positive or even any other kind of declarative statements about Islam like CCC 841. I could instead say (and have instead said) “The Qur’an says _____. The Bible says _____. I believe in the Bible because _____.”OTOH we can say this, “Since we worship the same God, let’s see where we can share what we have in common or where our difference lies”. Facts will speak for themselves then.
Opinion is not really one of those “true” or “false” things. Obviously I agree with my opinion on the Catholic Church and its communion (and I have met a few ex-Catholic, now Orthodox Christians who have made similar statements, so I know it’s not just me), but that’s neither here nor there.
Like Gurney, I am not seeing the “apologetic ammo” (I enjoy this phrase – thanks, Gurney!) that Catholics see in CCC 841. It is quite clearly a declarative statement. I don’t think anyone in this thread has claimed that CCC 841 does not address Islam; the problem is in the manner in which it does so.
Nobody in this thread is suggesting anything like that, and you can disagree with CCC 841 without supporting the idiocy of Mr. Jones. This is a definite misdirect.
And what about St. John Damascene? The unnamed monk of Bet Hale? Why is their model of straightforward, unambiguous statements so terrible? I rather prefer it to JP II.
I strongly disagree with this analysis, but then you know what they say about opinions…
Yeah, um…or we can not kiss the Qur’an…there’s always that option, too…
Why? Why should I pretend like the only options are kissing the Qur’an (metaphorically or literally, to “show respect”) or being a jerk? I don’t like these false dichotomies you are setting up, Rueben. I think they hurt your position, even though I know you are sincere in holding it.
Again, these are NOT the only options. The option I would choose, not given so far, does not involve what I would see as lying (telling Muslims we worship the same God), but instead involves telling the truth about Christ and Christianity. Note that this does not require me to make positive or even any other kind of declarative statements about Islam like CCC 841. I could instead say (and have instead said) “The Qur’an says _____. The Bible says _____. I believe in the Bible because _____.”
Very simple, very straight-forward, serious, and based on substantial issues. No need to kiss anything, and yet also no need to be a jerk just for the sake of it. This is the only model of interfaith dialogue I will follow.