I
inJESUS
Guest
Amen.Today it was reported that a man named Ali Malaik (sp?) from Somalia was executed because he converted to Christianity. May he rest in peace and pray for us.
Amen.Today it was reported that a man named Ali Malaik (sp?) from Somalia was executed because he converted to Christianity. May he rest in peace and pray for us.
This is why it’s so hard to find anybody to testify against the “no compulsion in religion” lie. Most of those who got to test out that claim first-hand aren’t around to talk.Amen.
Yes, agreed, we, Catholics also have our violent past, throughout the Inquisition and part of the Crusades, and even now with the violence and ugliness of the sex scandals, but the difference is that the people who practiced violence were doing this AGAINST their faith. It was not at all according to the teachings of the Catholic Faith, which is in fact about giving the enemy the other cheek. Christianity does not preach jihad or “holy war”.Attitudes like these towards Muslims have helped convince me to leave Catholicism.
I’m sad when I read these threads. A quote from a medieval Byzantine Emperor about his rivals for power is being used to describe Islam again…it’s as if we’ve learned nothing from a violent, intolerant history.
Thank you, Cestusdei, for being one of many who has helped me to see that Catholicism is not the path to truth that I need to follow.
'" All things work well for those who love God and are called according to His will…"I hope that the Pope doesn’t cave and formally apologize. JPII’s kissing of the Koran was more than enough. The Muslim violent reaction once again shows that they are lunatics and bullies who cannot function in a free world.
The position is not what matters; consensus on the issues exists for important moral laws like: killing, adultery, etc etc etc. There is broad consensus on every single one of the ten commandments, for example, in Islam.Countries like this have a system in place to decide with certainty who the people in authority are, so that there is no dispute. You don’t have a bunch of self-appointed leaders with equal (subjective) claim to power. You have claimed this is not the case with Islam, and that there are definite positions of authority but so far you have not named one of them.
This is completely contradicting to the events that happen in the life of our Lord, Jesus of Nazareth. Even though people were accusing him of bad things, he was NOT provoked and in fact he disagreed with provoked killing. When Peter tried to get out his sword to kill the men who were beating him, he said…“those who live by the sword, will die by the sword.” It says to "kill the unbeliever " and we are unbelievers because we do not believe the message the way Muhammed sent it and that is why when people try to convert to Christianity they end up being killed. Just the fact that we are not Muslims should not be provoking.The position is not what matters; consensus on the issues exists for important moral laws like: killing, adultery, etc etc etc. There is broad consensus on every single one of the ten commandments, for example, in Islam.
You are claiming that self-appointed leaders are creating problems, but what you are failing to recognize is that no one, anywhere in this tradition, argues that unprovoked killing is allowed. Not even Bin Laden. That’s pretty good evidence that the book does not command killing unbelievers…and if you’re reading it to say otherwise, you got it wrong.
Of course not. Nothing justifies attacks on civilians.So Pro-Universal, was the provocation of American troops stationed in Saudi Arabia with the consent of the Saudi government enough to justify Bin Laden’s attack on the US?
This is completely contradicting to the events that happen in the life of our Lord, Jesus of Nazareth. Even though people were accusing him of bad things, he was NOT provoked and in fact he disagreed with provoked killing. When Peter tried to get out his sword to kill the men who were beating him, he said…“those who live by the sword, will die by the sword.” It says to "kill the unbeliever " and we are unbelievers because we do not believe the message the way Muhammed sent it and that is why when people try to convert to Christianity they end up being killed. Just the fact that we are not Muslims should not be provoking.The position is not what matters; consensus on the issues exists for important moral laws like: killing, adultery, etc etc etc. There is broad consensus on every single one of the ten commandments, for example, in Islam.
You are claiming that self-appointed leaders are creating problems, but what you are failing to recognize is that no one, anywhere in this tradition, argues that unprovoked killing is allowed. Not even Bin Laden. That’s pretty good evidence that the book does not command killing unbelievers…and if you’re reading it to say otherwise, you got it wrong.
Wait, how did I put the blame on the US? Not once did I say the attack was justified.Pro Universal Quote:While we can argue about many things on this subject, I think it is beyond dispute that people in this region have been victims of unjust oppression, and that the United States shares a significant role in supporting and enabling the abusers. unquote
While you did say that nothing justifies attacks on civilians, you then turn around and seem to put the blame on the 9/11 attack on the US. If nothing justifies the attack, then nothing justifies it. period. Not that people in the region have been victims of unjust opression or that the US shares a significant role in supporting and enabling the abusers.
Can you make a short declarative statement saying that?
No, he did not state that alone, though that is certainly a part of the reason. He said those troops were there only to defend American cronies and help to prosecute a war on Muslims. He also mentioned Israel…look up his speeches sometime and read them.Actually, as I remember after 9/11 he did state that it was because of foreign, non-muslim troops stationed in Saudi Arabia that gave him permission to attack the US.
I looked at what the Pope said and I see nothing wrong with it. Did you actually read what the Pope said ?All I have to say is…look at this response.
Do you think trumpeting and repeating this ad nauseum on every thread about muslims will make somebody’s day ? It’s just pathetic. You said it once, we’ve all got it, now please try to come up with some real arguments. Not even a muslim leaves his faith for the reasons you keep repeating.Here’s a significant reason for why I am no longer Catholic.
Maybe - just maybe - is this because Islam gives enough fuel for the fire by acting irrational ? I would be glad if I would not have to write so many “considerations”. But there are too many to be ignored.Post after post on Muslims, and if I refute one point…some other consideration comes in.
Because from all religions in existence in the 21st century only Islam behaves like they’ve just made it past the bronze age - all the solutions to their problems require a bat (or an AK-47).I point out that other religions have problems with violence as well, and suddenly the claim that Islam is the most evil becomes “well, other bad things don’t justify it!”
Nobody can find it but, strangely enough, forced conversions and unprovoked killing do happen. Which one of the three failed to do its job: the belief system ? the level of education? the culture?I point out that you can’t find a single Muslim authority who says unprovoked killing is permissible or that forced conversion is allowed, I get quotes about democracy from a google Imam.
Well then! For goodness sake! Somebody should go in an teach those fanatics what they were missing in their Quran readings because they surely behave like they’ve never seen these verses ! I earn to see even one muslim living up to these ! Should also the Pope do the readings for them ?Quote after quote from the Koran is lifted about battle when literally the next verse says “but don’t fight anyone who doesn’t fight you; give sanctuary to anyone who stops fighting you even if they started it.”
But it’s not about ignorance! I desperatly want to believe that what they are doing is not because the Quran tells them to! But at every turn their actions prove me dead wrong and people die because of this !This is really incorrigible ignorance.
I am now watching TV and I see the gatherings of people going nuts for the Pope’s out of context quote and then I wander who is really frothing at the mouth…I could spend all year replying to every post, and it’s clear to me that this would not change any minds on this matter…there would just be another, different issue to justify all the frothing at the mouth.
Did you make a mission statement of repeating this over an over ? Because the first time I heard it I felt pity, then I become confused about the reasons you did it and now I am starting to think that you’re just looking for excuses for leaving your faith. Poor soul ! May God have pity on you.I’m certainly more comfortable with my own personal decision to end my relationship with Catholicism when I see this, so that’s a good thing from my perspective at least.
All the debate here is not about the innocent muslims. It is about those that stir up hatred and - in your words - are irrationaly foaming at the mouth for some ridiculous things. God will always care for his innocents - christians and muslim alike . That’s for sure!I just hope you all will be ready to change your tunes if/when a movement to kill innocent Muslims springs up in our turf. From the looks of things, the lives of innocent Muslims appear to be pretty far down on the list of concerns here.
Why do you have to keep diverting the subject? I asked you whose interpretations of the Quran are authoritative for Muslims, and why. So far you still haven’t given me a single name.The position is not what matters; consensus on the issues exists for important moral laws like: killing, adultery, etc etc etc. There is broad consensus on every single one of the ten commandments, for example, in Islam.
You are claiming that self-appointed leaders are creating problems, but what you are failing to recognize is that no one, anywhere in this tradition, argues that unprovoked killing is allowed. Not even Bin Laden. That’s pretty good evidence that the book does not command killing unbelievers…and if you’re reading it to say otherwise, you got it wrong.