P
Peeps
Guest
I agree with much of your excellent post, but not this.Seriously, even in LA, why does a choir director need more than $50,000/year?
My daughter works in the entertainment industry and lived in San Diego and did a lot of work in LA. A$50,000 salary is a drop in the bucket in that expensive area.
Her tiny little apartment rent was over twice as much as our mortgage for our ranch home in Northern Illinois! And getting around is expensive–gas is more costly, and the traffic means that you have to plan lots of extra time to drive anywhere–that’s time that you cannot teach music lessons or play for weddings and funerals.
I’m assuming that the person you call “choir director” is actually the parish music director, who selects the hymns for Masses and oversees the entire liturgy throughout the year in the parish (which is probably large and has several Masses on Saturday and Sunday).
I think that a $50,000 salary sounds appropriate for a parish music director if they are also able to supplement that income by teaching private lessons, teaching in the parish school, playing secular gigs, playing weddings and funerals, and perhaps writing/arranging music.
Also, their salary had BETTER be separate from the parish music budget! The music director should not have to pay to have the piano tuned, the organ serviced, and buy their own choir repertoire!
Also, it would be nice if the parish paid for the music director to attend liturgical music conferences, and gave him/her a budget for purchasing music for his/her preludes, postludes, etc. These books are expensive! Also, textbooks and other material for his/her continuing education in the field of liturgical music. These expenditures, IMO, should not come out of the music director’s salary.
A music director does not take a vow of celibacy or poverty! If they have a family to support, the salary should probably be higher than $50,000 in L.A.!
Last edited: