D
dochawk
Guest
err, yes.I’m sure you meant to write “sinning” instead of “singing”, right?![]()
:crazy_face:
err, yes.I’m sure you meant to write “sinning” instead of “singing”, right?![]()
It sounds to me like you live in an “exception” to much of the rest of the U.S.I live in LA. That should tell you a lot.
If the priest does rein it in, people say, he’s being authoritarian and needs to give lay people more space to get involved. How dare he cut off the oxygen of their creativity and initiative.Oh well, music at Mass is a can of worms. It ranges from the dreadful the sublime. Why the priests don’t seem to reign it in is indeed the question. Ditto for bishops.
Although there is an old debate that keeps on coming up in music history circles on whether in these examples harps actually means harps, or whether it means lyres.Being carried on Eagles wings in scripture is found in Exodus 19:4 and is of God’s care and protection of the Israelites as they are in Exodus, coming out of Egypt and wandering the desert on their journey into Israel. God stretching out His wings and protectively placing His people within them.
Staying with the Old Testament, David praised God with musical instruments including his harp, ( an instrument he was very skilled at) singing and dancing. The harp in one of its forms, was also the instrument used in the Temple to accompany liturgy.
As Psalm 137:1-2 - By the rivers of Babylon where we sat down, there we wept when we remembered Zion. There on the (willows or poplars) we hung our harps.
Didn’t Augusine say, he who watches cheesy low-budget youtube videos of popular hymns prays three times?Good thing your religion doesn’t have an obligation to watch music videos!![]()
And I cannot say it enough, the stuff you are referring to is not disobedience.I can’t say it enough times: it’s not about preference but obedience.
Language. It is a thing. “Should” is not “shall”, and qualifiers cannot be ignored.According to whom?
I do not think you know what that word means, at least in the context that it was being used. If the point is that music is what draws people back to the Church, and I believe that was the point being made, then it is not a straw man. That said, the posts are there for anyone wanting to see for themselves.It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s a straw man!
Calling others disobedience is not charitable, unless there is black and white disobedience, as in, one is told explicitly to do one thing, one does not do that thing specifically. If there is a case where a priest is disobeying directives handed down by his bishop, then that could be relayed to that bishop, to see if he agrees that action is needed. Disobedience must be a specific violation of an order, not a general and none specific instruction.EmmaSowl, I’m not sure if this is really a good way to approach this. “Obedience” sounds rather punitive.
That may explain at the discussion differences. However, it should be noted that the GIRM allows for this, being general and all,EmmaSowl:![]()
It sounds to me like you live in an “exception” to much of the rest of the U.S.I live in LA. That should tell you a lot.
LA is multicultural, and different than parts elsewhere.Great importance should therefore be attached to the use of singing in the celebration of the Mass, with due consideration for the culture of peoples and abilities of each liturgical assembly.
And yet I did not then just go out and buy a bunch of CDs. I came back to the Church, where I could not (by a very long shot, and with very few exceptions) find the music that brought me back.I do not think you know what that word means, at least in the context that it was being used. If the point is that music is what draws people back to the Church, and I believe that was the point being made, then it is not a straw man. That said, the posts are there for anyone wanting to see for themselves.
This can be true of essentially anything and everything a parish does. Pastors do have to be prudent about how they lead their parishes, though. It can be thankless work that is going to get somebody mad no matter what they do. That doesn’t mean they’re free to lead in whatever way they like without concerning themselves at all with how their leadership feels to the people who volunteer their time to doing the things necessary to making a parish run. They are always needing to find the middle way, between the white lines, avoiding both the ditch on the left and the ditch on the right.If the priest does rein it in, people say, he’s being authoritarian and needs to give lay people more space to get involved. How dare he cut off the oxygen of their creativity and initiative.
If the priest doesn’t rein it in, people complain about awful music.
So it’s a losing proposition both ways?
It was not snide. There is no need for that sort of stuff. Like I said, all the posts are still here, if anyone cares to weigh attitude, if anyone cares. One thing that will be found is that I never dismissed anything, again, using the proper definition of “dismissed”. I would rather say the rhetorical excess has been the opposite, insulting of musicians that serve their parishes in ways that some here do not think proper.Besides, your comment was just snide, and was dismissive of the very thing that Vatican II called “a treasure of inestimable value, greater even than any other art.”
I do not know how to respond to this. I was “casual”? Bad music can have bad effects and good music can have good effects. I have no emotional response to this (casual) because it is the way language works, especially with terms like this that can have so many meanings. Know that not everyone here will agree with everyone else. That does not make the person wrong. I get quite emotional about issues where I see serious problems.Don’t be so casual about the bad effects of bad music, and the good effects of good music
That is an interesting term. Is the idea of universal culture an oxymoron? I think there is a type of Roman Rite culture rooted in Gregorian chant. The Church teaches this. Except for that, I do not know how much is truly universal.Is there such a thing as Catholic culture?
Perhaps you should consider the possibility that not everyone finds the music “bad, banal, insipid, and poorly-done.”Sacred Music is “a necessary or integral part of the liturgy,” (again, Vatican II). Don’t be so casual about the bad effects of bad music, and the good effects of good music. Don’t be so dismissive of people who are negatively affected in their faith life by bad, banal, insipid, poorly-done music, and who yearn for sacred beauty and transcendence as found in the treasure of inestimable value.
That’s a very interesting question.Is there such a thing as Catholic culture? Why can’t we have at least some Catholic culture reflected in the music at Mass – why does it all have to reflect pop culture?
Just one point. We (I) sing music (Propers) written in English and composed in the last decade. Music which does flow organically from the ancient music of the Church.You obviously love the ancient music of the Church.
But, does it matter what the Church teaches? Gregorian chant = Pride of Place?Loud-living-dogma:![]()
That’s a very interesting question.Is there such a thing as Catholic culture? Why can’t we have at least some Catholic culture reflected in the music at Mass – why does it all have to reflect pop culture?
I don’t think there is such a thing as “Catholic Culture” because the Church is world-wide and includes every nation and culture and language and MUSIC in the world!
It seems that some Catholics are kind of stuck on the idea of a Catholic Church that looks, sounds, smells, and FEELS like Medieval Europe. To them, that’s “Catholic Culture.”
But here in the U.S., you are seeing more and more Evangelical Protestants convert to Catholicism (me and my husband, eg!), and Medieval Europe does not seem “Catholic” to us. It just seems like “Medieval Europe.”
So I don’t think that “Catholic Culture” can be pinned down to any one set of practices, other than the Sacraments and the Mass, and the importance and beauty of the True Presence of Jesus Christ.
About half of our schola are converts from Protestantism, and they are the most traditional. Veils and much more. Both the older ones and the younger ones.It seems that some Catholics are kind of stuck on the idea of a Catholic Church that looks, sounds, smells, and FEELS like Medieval Europe. To them, that’s “Catholic Culture.”
But here in the U.S., you are seeing more and more Evangelical Protestants convert to Catholicism (me and my husband, eg!), and Medieval Europe does not seem “Catholic” to us. It just seems like “Medieval Europe.”
That’s interesting. It’s not the case here, but again, I will cite “The WIllow Creek Effect.” We have some really really good contemporary Christian music and also Praise and Worship music in some of our Willow Creek church plants and people truly like it.About half of our schola are converts from Protestantism, and they are the most traditional. Veils and much more. Both the older ones and the younger ones.