H
Hodos
Guest
It is completely true. You get to make a decision for how much you are willing to work for, and who you are willing to work for. You don’t have the right though to be shielded from the consequences of your decisions. If I decide to price my labor out of the market, I won’t have a job. That’s my choice and I am responsible for it. If I decide I don’t want to work for a specific employer, I have plenty of other options to choose from. The same goes for the company by the way. If they decide they want to underpay for the value of your labor, they end up either not being able to hire employees, have to settle for hiring lower skilled employees, or with high turnover rates that hurt their business. Both sides are responsible for their decisions. You are confusing your own responsibility as a free agent though with someone else’s free agency. What I mean is, when I work for someone there are two parties at the table, both of which are trying to exchange something for another good. The company wants to obtain your labor, you want to obtain financial compensation. You both have to agree on the exchange in order for their to be a transaction. If not, one or both of you are free to walk away from the transaction. What I am seeing in your statement is that you don’t seem to think that both sides should have equal say in what they are willing to exchange.That is not true. In some sense, if you want to live and you want your family to live, you have to have money. In order to have money you have to work |(unless you have an inheritance or are able to siphon off money from government contracts, say as commission or similar). Now you are presented with a list of employers who will take you If you want a job, then you have little choice in most cases except to work for someone who is providing that opportunity for you to work for them.
Last edited: