The Reliability of the Koran

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Holly3278

Guest
Hi everyone. Is the Koran historically reliable? Is it reliable in other ways? Why or why not? 🤷:confused:
 
This post illustrates just one such instance where the Qur’an has been proven to be more historically accurate than the Old Testament.
 
Hi everyone. Is the Koran historically reliable? Is it reliable in other ways? Why or why not? 🤷:confused:
There is an historic event that I’m quite passionate about - The crucifixion of Christ. I’m fascinated by this event because it fulfills ancient prophecy, and historians - generally - can prove it. But the Islamic scripture has the confidence to say that Jesus wasn’t crucified.

So, either history and tradition is wrong, or the Islamic scripture is wrong.
 
There is an historic event that I’m quite passionate about - The crucifixion of Christ. I’m fascinated by this event because it fulfills ancient prophecy, and historians - generally - can prove it. But the Islamic scripture has the confidence to say that Jesus wasn’t crucified.

So, either history and tradition is wrong, or the Islamic scripture is wrong.
Hmmm, that’s true. Thanks for that! Good point! šŸ‘
 
Hi everyone. Is the Koran historically reliable? Is it reliable in other ways? Why or why not? 🤷:confused:
As the French scientist/philosopher Blaise Pascal once remarked, ā€œWho testifies to Muhammad other than Muhammad?ā€
 
Mahomet (who was a pedophile) was deceived by an inferior demon claming to be the Archangel Gabriel.

Therefore, every word in the Coran is a lie, including A, AN, and THE.

**God bless the Crusaders!

I confess there is NO GOD but Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and Jesus is God Incarnate risen from the dead! **
 
If the original poster has no interest in what I have to say on a matter, then why should I have any interest in what he or she says? If I post an article that he or she won’t read, then why should I waste my time reading an article that he or she has posted? Such a thread as this is utterly fruitless.🤷
 
If the original poster has no interest in what I have to say on a matter, then why should I have any interest in what he or she says? If I post an article that he or she won’t read, then why should I waste my time reading an article that he or she has posted? Such a thread as this is utterly fruitless.🤷
On the plus side, at least the OP brought chips and dip.
 
If the original poster has no interest in what I have to say on a matter, then why should I have any interest in what he or she says? If I post an article that he or she won’t read, then why should I waste my time reading an article that he or she has posted? Such a thread as this is utterly fruitless.🤷
Actually, I don’t believe the thread is fruitless. I can learn more about why the Koran is inaccurate. šŸ‘
 
This post illustrates just one such instance where the Qur’an has been proven to be more historically accurate than the Old Testament.
Nonsense. The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, not Arabic. The books of Moses were written at the time when the Egyptians called their king Pharoah, and this word was adopted into the Hebrew language as a generic name for an Egyptian king. (eg note the book of Exodus never refers to Rameses II by name, simply by the word ā€œPharoahā€).
 
Well if you already had your answer, why did you open the thread? 🤷
this thread is usefull.if u can answer properly then do it.but when muslim can answer about Quran?because Quran has mathematical&historical blunder,contradictory verses.but when we showed it muslims edited Quran or suggest us to learn math;).that wasn’t our answer.so try to answer us with logic not with emotion&not with another question:)
 
Actually, I don’t believe the thread is fruitless. I can learn more about why the Koran is inaccurate. šŸ‘
I agree with you.
I also think that this thread isn’t fruitless.and Quran is inaccurate because it is a man created book&it is not the word of God.but muslim fellows will try to prove it as the word of God like they always did;).anyway you have posted another nice thread.šŸ‘
 
In my opinion, the main point is whether its from God The Most High or not, reliability comes second, and it depends on how do you define reliability, is it the authentic historical facts or being free from scientific and grammatical errors…

We Muslims believe in Quran even if it contains historical, scientific, and grammatical errors, simply its our faith, so we have to believe in it (right or wrong), Islamic clerics teach you that from your early elementary school, and during the faith sessions in the mosques, if we face any contraindication in Quran, we simply say ā€œAllah and his messenger know bestā€, and we stop right there. 😦

The problem is with the history of Quran, that I personally find it questionable, considering these facts:
  • In the time of the third caliph ā€œcalled Uthmanā€, he burned all versions of Quran and kept only one, (E) (A).
  • Some verses of the Quran were eaten by a goat under Aisha (Muhammed’s wife) bed. (A)
  • The Quran of the ā€œSuniā€ is a little bit different that the one with the ā€œShiatā€.
We in Islam always say that Quran words were written long back in the God’s Preserved Tablet (aka Alawhu Almahfuz), if that is the case then how the above is possible!

And as I said in the beginning, I think the more important thing here is whether its from God or not, because simply I can come up with a perfectly written book with best practices from all previous faiths, and claim that Gabriel has visited me. šŸ˜‰
 
Hi everyone. Is the Koran historically reliable? Is it reliable in other ways? Why or why not? 🤷:confused:
Well, Koran is the best miracle happened. That’s what Mohamed told. Don’t ask me who is this Mohamed. read Koran. If you want spent the after life in place place with lots of virgins, wine and other things follow Koran and Mohamed.

Kallukalam
 
Well, Koran is the best miracle happened. That’s what Mohamed told. Don’t ask me who is this Mohamed. read Koran. If you want spent the after life in place place with lots of virgins, wine and other things follow Koran and Mohamed.

Kallukalam
Personally, I seek an afterlife of union with God with no human desires getting the in the way. I could care less about wine and things, let alone a bunch of virgins. In fact, some large group of women would be more trouble than they are worth. The heaven promised by the Quran is earth without sin, not union with God.

I’ll stick with Jesus, thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top