The same God?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eucharist04
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No you don’t. You have to hold that Christians worship the true God, and others worship something else. This seems fine by me, as the belief in the Trinity is not optional. Deny Christ as God, deny the Holy Spirit as God, and you deny God. Period.
Exactly. We believe that Jesus is God. Plain and simple. If someone says they believe in the same God as me I ask them if they believe that Jesus is God. If their answer is no then no we do not believe in the same God.

You aren’t implying that there is more than one God by saying you don’t believe in the same one. Just like how if I say I do not believe in Hindu gods it does not mean I am saying there is more than one God out there.
 
I’m sensitive to the idea of not yielding to important doctrines for political correctness or an overly ambitious ecumenicism, but If we are going to say that we worship different gods when we differ in beliefs then there are as many gods as their are people. I’m sure each of us has a slightly different understanding of God. Yes, some of us may agree on many doctrines, even what we call essential doctrines, but in our minds we probably have slightly different beliefs. So do we all worship a different God?

Since Paul tells us in his letter to the Romans that God has revealed Himself in His creation then I think we should say that many of those who worship a single god are deficient in their knowledge. At what point does it go from a deficient understanding to an inadequate understanding might be harder to pin down exactly.
We do not worship the same God as Muslims, Jews, Mormons, Buddhist, Hindus or whatever.
We worship One God, three in one a Trinity. Muslims worship a god called Allah. If you would tell a strict Muslim, that he worshiped the same god as a Christian, he would probably kill you for blasphemy against his god.
I dont know what a strict Muslim would do, but I’m pretty sure Allah is just the Arabic word for God and that Christians in lands where Arabic is spoken would use the word Allah for God the same as we do in English.
 
In all honesty, I don’t think it really matters. Just become Christian, and all is well in the spiritual department 🙂
 
I here and read that christians (Catholics and Protestants) say that we we worship the same God as the Muslims but if you ask a Muslim the same question he will say no:confused: So why are we so naive in the church to think that we do:confused:
So it’s the Magisterium of the Catholic Church which is naive, eh? And not the average internet surfer? 🤷
 
I read that the Muslim idea of God is very different from who we know God to be. (For convenience, I will refer to the god Muslims visualize as Allah.)

God’s primary attribute is love; Allah’s is transcendence. In other words, humans can know God, but they can’t know Allah (except through the Quran and through angels)–in fact, from what I read, the 99 attributes of Allah say what he is not, but not what he is. Allah doesn’t even care about humans enough to do much more than send angels to speak to prophets.

God is limited by His own nature, so He can’t lie, contradict himself, or do evil; Allah isn’t even limited by that.

God is three persons (the Trinity); Allah is not even a person or spirit.

Allah sounds nothing like the God I know. The only reason Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews call God “Allah” is because “Allah” comes from al-ilah, or “the god.”

This is what happens when a human-made religion tries to imagine what God might be like.
Allah means God in Arabic 🙂 Allah doesn’t refer to the God that Muslims believe in, but just God overall.
 
I’m sensitive to the idea of not yielding to important doctrines for political correctness or an overly ambitious ecumenicism, but If we are going to say that we worship different gods when we differ in beliefs then there are as many gods as their are people. I’m sure each of us has a slightly different understanding of God. Yes, some of us may agree on many doctrines, even what we call essential doctrines, but in our minds we probably have slightly different beliefs. So do we all worship a different God?

Since Paul tells us in his letter to the Romans that God has revealed Himself in His creation then I think we should say that many of those who worship a single god are deficient in their knowledge. At what point does it go from a deficient understanding to an inadequate understanding might be harder to pin down exactly.

I dont know what a strict Muslim would do, but I’m pretty sure Allah is just the Arabic word for God and that Christians in lands where Arabic is spoken would use the word Allah for God the same as we do in English.
If a Christian wants to use Allah for God that is fine, but that doesn’t mean that Muslim worship the same god as the Christian God.
 
If a Christian wants to use Allah for God that is fine, but that doesn’t mean that Muslim worship the same god as the Christian God.
I’m pretty sure a Christian would use the word Allah for God if they are in a country that uses Arabic.

So who does worship the same God? What is your criteria and what justifies your criteria?
 
I’m pretty sure a Christian would use the word Allah for God if they are in a country that uses Arabic.

So who does worship the same God? What is your criteria and what justifies your criteria?
All orthodox Christians that worship the Triune God.
 
The heretical sect that is said to have had the most profound effect on Islam were the Ebionites…
That’s what I think.

The Ebionites had a very Jewish understanding of what a Messiah would be. The term did not necessarily indicate divinity.

The sad fact is Arabia was to a great extent a wilderness on the fringes of civilization. Heresies that would have died out or been stamped out in mainstream Christian society could have survived (and probably did) in such places, in part because some people would flee to the deserts for their own safety and in part because antiquated and curious ideas and practices that spread naturally by word of mouth can carry on in out of the way places when the rest of educated society has moved on. Plus he (Muhammed) was a merchant who traveled into Christian towns, and he could encountered ideas of every sort wherever he went including every possible Christian opinion and private speculation.

The Muslim understanding about Jesus is very much like the Ebionite understanding, but he didn’t really have to meet an Ebionite to encounter the beliefs. There are many people today who will say the same sort of thing, they believe Jesus was “a great man”, “very wise” etc. and yet not really divine.

What seems almost certain is that at no time was Muhammad himself a Christian. He was never baptized and never catechized, he was never convinced of it. What he learned about it was second hand chatter.
 
I’m pretty sure a Christian would use the word Allah for God if they are in a country that uses Arabic.

So who does worship the same God? What is your criteria and what justifies your criteria?
The problem here is that if you and I believe different things about God, then either one of us is right and the other wrong, or we are both wrong.

It isn’t just that we acknowledge that there is a God, Christians were probably the the first religion in ancient times to make what we think about God an important criteria. I think perhaps this is because we are monotheists. If we mix imagination into our concept of God, we are not worshiping God, we are worshiping a product of our imagination, we are projecting.

If I teach you what I imagine God to be like, and you accept it, you are not worshiping the God of revelation, you are worshiping my imagination.

Even in Apostolic times and further back there were other cults of monotheists, they worshiped one God too. But they did not worship the same God.
 
We do not worship the same God as Muslims, Jews, Mormons, Buddhist, Hindus or whatever.
We worship One God, three in one a Trinity. Muslims worship a god called Allah. If you would tell a strict Muslim, that he worshiped the same god as a Christian, he would probably kill you for blasphemy against his god.
Jews rejected Christ, whoever rejects Christ cannot worship our God,
Mormons like to say that they are Christians, but they worship a god of this world. In their view there are other worlds and other gods.
People want to be politically correct and say that Christians, Muslims, and Jews are people of the book and that we all worship the same God and that there are may paths to God, but Christ said that no one goes to the Father except through Him. Christ was not politically correct.:signofcross:
Then the God of Transubstantiation is different than the God of Consubstantiation. They both can’t be the same. The God in your mind would be different than the one in others and the determining factor would be intellectual correctness. The God that instituted seven Sacraments is not different than the one that instituted two, but those two Sacraments are a source of God’s Grace in the level of truth those who believe in the “God of two Sacraments” posses.

God exists outside of our concepts and where these concepts agree with the Truth that is in God and comes to us from God, wherever these concepts may find a home, the Muslim mind, the Hindu mind, the Jewish mind, then they are in union with this truth about God. These truths lead to a union with the source of all Truth, God, and they are a source of grace for that person or group.

In that Protestants have the love for Jesus and the Bible, these truths are a source of grace for them. Muslims have a veneration for Mary, although not the fullness of the knowledge of Her that Catholics have, but in that She appeared at Fatima, Portugal, (the name of a daughter of Muhammad), it can be seen as Her showing us as being a path of evangelization based on the level of truth Muslims already posses.

Catholics should hold on to the truths we are given but we must not use the differences with others as a separation. We must lovingly reject the false and even more lovingly accentuate the grace-filled truth. This in itself would be a grace-filled endeavor.
 
The problem here is that if you and I believe different things about God, then either one of us is right and the other wrong, or we are both wrong.
I fully agree.
It isn’t just that we acknowledge that there is a God, Christians were probably the the first religion in ancient times to make what we think about God an important criteria. I think perhaps this is because we are monotheists. If we mix imagination into our concept of God, we are not worshiping God, we are worshiping a product of our imagination, we are projecting.

If I teach you what I imagine God to be like, and you accept it, you are not worshiping the God of revelation, you are worshiping my imagination.

Even in Apostolic times and further back there were other cults of monotheists, they worshiped one God too. But they did not worship the same God.
I dont know enough about comparative religions to comment. It seems the Jews were very concerned about right practice and the Greeks valued right thought in philosophy.

I do not agree with your statements regarding imagination understanding imagining to mean creating a mental image. Imagining is what we do when we think. Some imagining corresponds to reality and some does not. Christ in metaphors was helping us to understand God through imagination.

Again I tend to believe that folks worship the same God but understand and worship him imperfectly. The reason I say that is what is the criteria for determining when one is worshiping the one true God? Even in one branch of Christianity the different members will have slightly different understandings of the entire nature God. I say this because we can only imperfectly understand God. I would argue that the notion of growing closer to God implies that we can know God more or less. If Christians can grow in their knowledge of God then their belief changes over time while they are a legitimate Christian. So are they worshiping a different God over time? I would not say so.

If one makes the claim that some are worshiping a different God then I’d like to know what criteria they use when making that decision and what justifies the criteria. There is a part of me that would like to say that some are worshiping a different God. But I am more persuaded to say they worship and understand God imperfectly. Some very imperfectly.
 
The god of Islam is a deity who is not perfect and is not immutable but changing. For instance, according to the Quran and the so-called authentic traditions Allah lacked an attribute which he then had to create and inscribe for himself:

**Say: To whom belongs what is in the heavens and the earth? Say: To Allah; He has ordained mercy on Himself; most certainly He will gather you on the resurrection day – there is no doubt about it. (As for) those who have lost their souls, they will not believe. S. 6:12 Shakir

And when those who believe in Our communications come to you, say: Peace be on you, your Lord has ordained mercy on Himself, (so) that if any one of you does evil in ignorance, then turns after that and acts aright, then He is Forgiving, Merciful. S. 6:54 Shakir**
 
I do not agree with your statements regarding imagination understanding imagining to mean creating a mental image. Imagining is what we do when we think. Some imagining corresponds to reality and some does not. Christ in metaphors was helping us to understand God through imagination.
Conceiving is what we do when we think.

Imagination is what we do to fill in the unknown parts. If we have difficulty conceiving of something, there is a real and present danger that the imagination will hijack our thinking.

Frank Sheed explained this very well in his book Theology and Sanity, a real classic.
 
Conceiving is what we do when we think.

Imagination is what we do to fill in the unknown parts. If we have difficulty conceiving of something, there is a real and present danger that the imagination will hijack our thinking.

Frank Sheed explained this very well in his book Theology and Sanity, a real classic.
I think we might be getting into semantics. I think it is hard to understand just what occurs in the mind. I believe one way to say that we think on an idea is to say we apprehend it. The word imagining has lots of connotations that included thinking about that which is not real, but does it preclude thinking about that which is real? I’m not yet willing to give up the word especially since we are created in the image of God, Imago Dei. But you may well be right in a strict sense.

That book might be useful for me. Sometimes thinking on theology makes me feel a little insane!
 
The actual term is “People of the Book” (Ahl al-Kitab), which refers to those religious communities (Christians, Jews, and I think also a few others who aren’t as well known like the Manicheans and Sabians) who Muslims believe received some sort of divine revelation in scriptures prior to the coming of Islam. It doesn’t really say anything about whether or not they believe a particular group to be worshiping the right God, as you may or may not know Muslims argue that Christians and others distorted their scriptures (with spurious, ambiguous references from their Qur’an to back up their view).
Of course, and Catholics believe Muslims distorted scripture as well.
I take it you mean “…but would NOT convert churches in mosques”? Otherwise that sentence doesn’t make sense. It’s wrong, anyway. Some of the most famous mosques in the world (e.g., the Umyyad mosque in Syria) used to be churches. In some places in the world (e.g., Turkey), the majority of mosques dating before the modern period were originally churches. In Spain, buildings that were originally churches changed back and forth with the shifting forces of the communities. This is why many of the older churches in Spain have a certain “Islamic” look to them (which is really the Islamic recension of Eastern Christian architecture, stripped of its obvious Christian symbolism).
No, I meant exactly what I wrote. You misread what I wrote, attempted to correct, and berate me for being factually wrong. Islam destroyed pagan temples, but preserved “houses of God”, hence why “some of the most famous mosques in the world” are former churches.
Well that was awfully nice. It’s a shame that there is no consistency in this regard. In subsequent centuries (and especially in the modern era) there has been no respect for anything Christian in the holy land, as political conflicts have sacrificed our villages and holy sites, either at the hands of the Muslims (e.g., the shootout in which Islamists took up positions inside the church a few years ago, leading to much damage), or Jews (e.g., starving via blockade and media blackout the peaceful protestors of the Christian-majority village of Beit Sahour during the first intifada).
Well, for the past hundred years, the United States, France, and Britain have provided material support for the worst and most brutal of dictators (Saddam Hussein, etc.).

Some Arabs may have responded with unjustifiable violence but the vast majority of victims in all of this violence are Muslim Arabs, who are equally disgusted by the violence as we are. Now why don’t they “denounce” violence? Many have, but that’s easy to ignore.
This is an Islamic talking point, meant to open the naive to their evangelization efforts and nothing more. Don’t buy it. They mock us for worshiping a “God who eats”, or a “God who dies” or whatever.
Prove it.

I’ve talked to Muslims and I trust people. Of course they disagree, and maybe they mock the angry anti-Muslims rants (with good reason), but authentically understanding their point of view means accepting they worship the same God we do, and accepting they believe the same thing in return.

It is a Catholic teaching that we worship the same God as Muslims. The plain language of the Catechism of the Catholic Church says this.
Catechism
"841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”
Lumen Gentium, 16
They don’t believe in the resurrection, because according to the Qur’an Jesus never died on the cross. It’s kind of hard to come back from the dead without dying in the first place.
I may have been mistaken on this point
Edit: Yeah! What Jakasaki said! :)😊
???
 
Of course, and Catholics believe Muslims distorted scripture as well.
I’m not sure what that has to do with anything. In the case of Muslims, it is a mainstream opinion that Christian scriptures were corrupted to the degree that the “real” teachings of Jesus were lost, and we essentially transgressed the original (Islamic) monotheism that was supposedly contained therein. So that distortion of scripture means that when Christians are called this or that positive term in the Qur’an, it is not necessarily with reference to today’s Christians/Christianity, since Muslims think that Christianity is based on corrupted texts. Whatever Catholics may believe about Muslims corrupting scripture, they apparently don’t think that corruption essentially disqualifies Muslims from worshiping God. So it’s not really comparable.
No, I meant exactly what I wrote.
Okay.
You misread what I wrote, attempted to correct, and berate me for being factually wrong.
Where/how did I berate you? :confused:
Islam destroyed pagan temples, but preserved “houses of God”, hence why “some of the most famous mosques in the world” are former churches.
Um…how is turning a church into a mosque preserving it? :confused:
Well, for the past hundred years, the United States, France, and Britain have provided material support for the worst and most brutal of dictators (Saddam Hussein, etc.).
Some Arabs may have responded with unjustifiable violence but the vast majority of victims in all of this violence are Muslim Arabs, who are equally disgusted by the violence as we are. Now why don’t they “denounce” violence? Many have, but that’s easy to ignore.
What does any of this have to do with the topic you brought up, which was the preservation of holy sites?
Prove it.
Okay. Here is evidence that as far back as 650+ years ago, they were mocking us for worshiping Christ (God), using terms very close to what I previously wrote (I had this poem in mind when I wrote that): A poem by Ibn al Qayyim al-Jawziyya from the 14th century “O, Christ worshipers”

This is not some radical opinion. These are the same kinds of objections we’ve been hearing from Islam for 1400 years and counting.
I’ve talked to Muslims and I trust people.
I’ve talked to Muslims, too. That’s why I know that when push comes to shove (i.e., when they’re not trying to convert us), we’re kaffar and mushrikoon and deserve whatever we get for worshiping a false God.
Of course they disagree, and maybe they mock the angry anti-Muslims rants (with good reason), but authentically understanding their point of view means accepting they worship the same God we do, and accepting they believe the same thing in return.
They don’t, though. That’s my point. If you read the Qur’an, you’ll no doubt read a lot of stuff that seems like they do (stuff about “your Lord and my Lord” or whatever), but placed in its proper historical context (e.g., within the context of Muhammad’s preaching), it is obvious that this is an evangelical tactic and not what they actually believe about Christianity. What they actually believe about Christianity is found elsewhere in their writings (including in the Qur’an), as in the 14th century poem I posted above.
It is a Catholic teaching that we worship the same God as Muslims. The plain language of the Catechism of the Catholic Church says this.
Yeah, I’m not getting into this again. The catechism is wrong, but I understand that it is the basis of the Catholic understanding on such matters.

The bottom line for Islam, however, is found in S 5:17, part of Surat al-Maeda (the Table), “revealed” in Medina, which says:

YUSUFALI: In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary. Say: “Who then hath the least power against Allah, if His will were to destroy Christ the son of Mary, his mother, and all every - one that is on the earth? For to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between. He createth what He pleaseth. For Allah hath power over all things.”

PICKTHAL: They indeed have disbelieved who say: Lo! Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary. Say: Who then can do aught against Allah, if He had willed to destroy the Messiah son of Mary, and his mother and everyone on earth? Allah’s is the Sovereignty of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them. He createth what He will. And Allah is Able to do all things.

SHAKIR: Certainly they disbelieve who say: Surely, Allah-- He is the Messiah, son of Marium. Say: Who then could control anything as against Allah when He wished to destroy the Messiah son of Marium and his mother and all those on the earth? And Allah’s is the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and what is between them; He creates what He pleases; and Allah has power over all things.

There you have it. We are disbelievers and blasphemers for believing in the divinity of Christ, according to Islam. And good riddance. Islam certainly does not worship God.
 
I here and read that christians (Catholics and Protestants) say that we we worship the same God as the Muslims but if you ask a Muslim the same question he will say no:confused: So why are we so naive in the church to think that we do:confused:
Sorry if this has been said (I did try searching but haven’t read all the way through), but a possible factor in some Muslims saying Christians worship a different God may be the latter’s belief in the Incarnation of Jesus and the Trinity - considered idolatrous and polytheistic to Muslims.
 
As I’ve learned it, it’s because Christians and Muslims have different views on the relationship between God and man. Christians believe God is a Father and men are His children, whereas Muslims believe God is a Master and men are His slaves. The word “Islam” means “surrender”, as in “surrender to God”. Muslims consider it blasphemous for one to call God your Father,** because it appears prideful**, and God can arbitrarily change His will, simply because He is God.
Code:
Not quite. We don't consider ourselves God's children in the sense that he is our Father in the Christian sense because we think its wrong. God is not the father of mankind. He is the Creator and Sustainer. Therefore we are his creation and slaves as we depend on him only, Its not because we think its prideful lol. I personally have pride that I am Allah's slave.
Secondly the other highlighted part seems to suggest that the Christian God cannot change his will arbitrarily. I'm exremley confident if he exists then he can and i'm certain there are examples in the Bible of when he has.
 
Either Muslims offer worship to a false god or false worship to the true God. Since they are monotheists, it is probably the latter. However, only Catholics offer true worship to God through the Mass. False worship, whether offered by Protestants, Jews, Muslims, etc. is objectively evil and offensive to God as a violation of the First Commandment (though not always subjectively sinful since it is often done out of ignorance).
40.png
Summa:
Every sin consists formally in aversion from God, as stated above (I-II, 71, 6; I-II, 73, 3). Hence the more a sin severs man from God, the graver it is. Now man is more than ever separated from God by unbelief, because he has not even true knowledge of God: and by false knowledge of God, man does not approach Him, but is severed from Him.

Nor is it possible for one who has a false opinion of God, to know Him in any way at all, because the object of his opinion is not God.
Therefore it is clear that the sin of unbelief is greater than any sin that occurs in the perversion of morals.
So what can we know:
  • Muslims believe in one God, which is correct.
  • Muslims offer false worship to God, which is objectively offensive to Him rather than pleasing.
  • Muslims have false knowledge of God, erroneous opinions.
  • Muslims are severed from God through the sin of unbelief.
  • Muslims cannot know God in any way at all.
Now, this only concerns those who formally adhere to the Muslim religion. Those who are actively seeking God, ready to abandon the errors of Islam, are more like unbaptized Catholics because they are open to the truth and may even be considered to have implicit Baptism of Desire. On the other hand, those who formally have embraced Islam have closed themselves off from the truth and salvation by accepting the lie of Islam. But those who are still open-minded, can be converted to the Catholic Faith and be saved.

So thus with regards to the OP, it seems that Muslims have the same God, they just don’t know Him, have many errors regarding Him, blaspheme the Son and the Holy Ghost and offend Him through false worship. However, there do remain good people who are externally Muslims while internally are seeking the true God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top