It is quite clear that Jesus is not referring the the books of the Maccabees in Matthew 24:15 since He specifically refers to the prophet Daniel. So what He is referring to is the abomination spoken of in Daniel 9:27.
The reference to paraying for the dead in 2 Maccabees is not with respect to praying to the saints in heaven. Even with respect to purgatory it does not support Catholic doctrine since those who were being prayed for wore pagan emblems and were idolaters. That is a mortal sin so they would not be in purgatory.
With respect to the canon, what authority does the Church have to determine canon? How do we know that the Church has infallible authority? You can’t use the Bible because we don’t know what it is before the Church establishes it. So how do we know the Church has infallible authority except on its own say so?
We must study history,documents, artifacts,there was
two peters in rome about the same time paul was.Simon magnus,
its the contention that some history buffs,try to arugue Simon magnus(a known sorcer,wizard worker of curses,magic)actually was the 1st pope and stole (the good peters)name reputation ect.
about 64 or 68 AD.You can also find how Peter and paul was killed,timothy,ect.King James well he wasnt much better than any other english king. whoremonger,drunk,murderer.the authorized version was the law because the king said so.300years
after king james ripped out several books of the Bible to claim his authorised version then people was led to believe Catholics added
books to the Bible??however Catholic version was the orginal to start with .How do we know this?1romans stole scribes from jews
they burned out gave them over to the latter catholic church.thats
history from all known writtings artifacts from various accounts
non christian,pagan,sunworshipers jews all people. not just a king in england.Most of the time people only use scripture,like when Jesus said to PETER BULID MY CHURCH ON A ROCK.or words to that effect.But theres so much proof in history its really overwheling.By the way Simmon magnus wasnt the 1st pope
again history did its job.Paul didnt mention Peter being in rome
because He stated he doesnt thread on anther saints area.well we
know paul wasnt talking about magnus,so that leaves Peter as 1st Pope.

GOD BLESS YOU