The Theory of Limbo

  • Thread starter Thread starter roseproject
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I do not know if this is true or not. Many people long considered the Summa to be part of the ordinary magisterium if the Church, taught by the Bishops in communion with the pope. And this was the case for sure, since it was used universally in the west in seminaries as the main theology text for 300 or 400 years. But I would agree at this point it is not.
People who say that the idea of Limbo of the Innocents was always only a theory and never a teaching of the Church are not correct imo. The letter from the Vatican stating it was a theory, acknowledge it had been taught by the magisterium in the past.
 
This debate should make us all realise one thing: the urgent need to baptise infants quickly.
 
Why couldn’t Christ release the unbaptised infants to heaven as well? I thought the afterlife is outside of time anyway. My little brain can’t get around it. Can I Baptise my belly so my unborn but deceased infant can go to heaven?
 
He could, I believe trusting in the mercy of God is just fine. It is hard to believe that God would create so many people who die before birth and not have some plan for their salvation. I personally do not claim a believe either way in the existence of a Limbo of the Infants. The logic makes sense, until one consider’s God’s love and mercy. So I just have hope for unbaptized infants, but then I have hope for any one.
 
I don’t proclaim to know what happens to unbaptized infants, but I wouldn’t find the idea of eternal natural happiness (as opposed to supernatural happiness) contrary to God’s love and mercy.
 
That is not what the church teaches. Christ has no need to battle the devil; he could snap his fingers, and the devil would cease to exist.

He descended to free the righteous who predeceased him. The damned stayed damned. Plenty of others here already described the various levels of separation from God.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p122a5p1.htm
Again, I didn’t say the Church teaches it. It’s a theological opinion of St Thomas Aquinas.

This whole thread is regarding Limbo which is NOT official Church teaching, but rather a theological opinion.

What we KNOW is that Jesus descended into Sheol / Hades (lowercase hell) to share the Good News with everyone in “Limbo of the Fathers” (also known as Abraham’s Bosom - and different, though similar to “Limbo of the Infants/Children”).

However, some theologians (including St Thomas) that Christ first when to Ghenna (Capital Hell) to fight the devil and lock him in Hell. Then, He when to free the Saints in Limbo.

That’s what I meant and this whole thread is about a theological opinion.

God Bless
 
It is an explicit tenant of the faith in the Apostles Creed that Christ died and descended into Hell.

“Hell” is separation from God. Christ went down to free the righteous of the Old Covenants, who were superated by virtue of not having a Messiah.
By death He trailed death,
And to those in the tomb, He granted life
My favorite part of the byzantine Resurrection Matins, typically offered before Pascha liturgy, and appearing in the liturgy in the weeks thereafter.

hawk
 
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Letentur coeli,” Sess. 6, July 6, 1439, ex cathedra: “We define also that…the souls of those who depart this life in actual mortal sin, or in original sin alone, go straightaway to hell, but to undergo punishments of different kinds.”

angel12 is wrong
 
I had a feeling that some Pope somewhere before had taught about Limbo.
 
From The Holy See’s website >>>>>

“It is clear that the traditional teaching on this topic has concentrated on the theory of limbo, understood as a state which includes the souls of infants who die subject to original sin and without baptism, and who, therefore, neither merit the beatific vision, nor yet are subjected to any punishment, because they are not guilty of any personal sin. This theory, elaborated by theologians beginning in the Middle Ages, never entered into the dogmatic definitions of the Magisterium, even if that same Magisterium did at times mention the theory in its ordinary teaching up until the Second Vatican Council. It remains therefore a possible theological hypothesis. However, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), the theory of limbo is not mentioned. Rather, the Catechism teaches that infants who die without baptism are entrusted by the Church to the mercy of God, as is shown in the specific funeral rite for such children. The principle that God desires the salvation of all people gives rise to the hope that there is a path to salvation for infants who die without baptism (cf. CCC, 1261), and therefore also to the theological desire to find a coherent and logical connection between the diverse affirmations of the Catholic faith: the universal salvific will of God; the unicity of the mediation of Christ; the necessity of baptism for salvation; the universal action of grace in relation to the sacraments; the link between original sin and the deprivation of the beatific vision; the creation of man “in Christ”.
The conclusion of this study is that there are theological and liturgical reasons to hope that infants who die without baptism may be saved and brought into eternal happiness, even if there is not an explicit teaching on this question found in Revelation. However, none of the considerations proposed in this text to motivate a new approach to the question may be used to negate the necessity of baptism, nor to delay the conferral of the sacrament. Rather, there are reasons to hope that God will save these infants precisely because it was not possible to do for them that what would have been most desirable— to baptize them in the faith of the Church and incorporate them visibly into the Body of Christ.”
 
I had a feeling that some Pope somewhere before had taught about Limbo.
He did NOT teach about Limbo. It was simply about unbaptised going to Hell. In fact it did not specifically address the unborn and unbaptised infants. That is why the Church TEACHES that they are entrusted to God’s mercy. That is the teaching about the unbaptised infants.
Do not forget that while the sacraments are the ordinary way God gave us to be saved God is not bound by the sacraments.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top