S
snarflemike
Guest
OK, glad all is clear. Thanks.I understand snarflemike, I was saying what I did only as an idea of how to demonstrate the Catholic position.
OK, glad all is clear. Thanks.I understand snarflemike, I was saying what I did only as an idea of how to demonstrate the Catholic position.
Another thing to try with them is to show from the Bible how God promised over and over again from the Prophets…OK, glad all is clear. Thanks.
I like using the water analogy. Water comes in three forms - solid, liquid, and gas - yet while it comes in these three forms, it is essentially the same substance.How do you teach the doctrine of the Trinity to someone who believes in the God Head?
This calls for wisdom: John 10 30 “I and the Father are one.”How do you teach the doctrine of the Trinity to someone who believes in the God Head?
I use the clover analogy most often but I was really trying to get other peoples opinions on how they would teach it. Say if some didn’t understand the clover analogy, i would use the water one that maximus pointed out. or the scriptures in John and Isaiah. I was just curious of others methods in understanding the trinityGiven that you list yourself as Irish Catholic,have you looked to St Patrick for ideas. There was a pretty concise explanation wrapped in a three leaf clover, if I remember correctly.![]()
Jesus never claimed to be God the Father and Christians don’t believe or teach that He is God the Father.here’s some of what was sent to me: What does this sound like to you?? I have to do this in two posts…
<>
Jesus was with God in the beginning. Surely He would have let His Apostles in on the fact that, “by the way, I really am God the Father and sorry about the confusion of calling myself the Son of God all the time!” But no, He insisted on the fact that He was not the Father but rather the Son.
The water analogy expresses a modalist view of God, which is heretical. I would not use that analogy if I were you. It just confuses people.I like using the water analogy. Water comes in three forms - solid, liquid, and gas - yet while it comes in these three forms, it is essentially the same substance.
Technically, a dog is also a person, if you mean to use the Greek term hypostasis which is the term that is translated as ‘person’ in trinitarian theology. Everything that exists concretely in fact has an hypostasis. There is also actually nothing magical about being consubstantial. Man is in fact also one substance with many persons, as is dog or cat (notice that is man as opposed to a man, which denotes an hypostasis). In the same way, there is one divine nature with three hypostases. We call the three one on account of their unity in nature (there is truly one Godhead) and also their unity in energy (no one person acts alone, such that we cannot separate them and say that the Son is a God, only that the Son is God). This is what the Cappadocian Fathers taught about the trinity, like Gregory of Nyssa in his treatise Not Three Gods or St. Basil in his epistle 38Jesus never claimed to be God the Father and Christians don’t believe or teach that He is God the Father.
This is where most non-trinitarians get confused. They ask “When Jesus was praying in the garden, was he praying to himself?” No, of course not, and no one claims that he was praying to himself. Christians believe that Jesus was praying to the Father, who is a distinct person, but is one in being with the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Non-trinitarians get hung up on the idea that the terms “being” and “person” mean the same thing. They do not.
A dog is one being, zero persons.
A human is one being, one person.
God is one being, three persons.
It is human nature to exist as one person tied to one being.
It is God’s nature to exist as a family of three persons. God is completely unique in this respect. Meditate on that for a while and you will see what I mean.
Non-trinitarians must either believe that there is more than one God (unbiblical), or they must believe that Jesus is not God (also unbiblical).
Paul
Blessings my Orthodox brother. How is life treating you these days?Technically, a dog is also a person, if you mean to use the Greek term hypostasis which is the term that is translated as ‘person’ in trinitarian theology. Everything that exists concretely in fact has an hypostasis. There is also actually nothing magical about being consubstantial. Man is in fact also one substance with many persons, as is dog or cat (notice that is man as opposed to a man, which denotes an hypostasis). In the same way, there is one divine nature with three hypostases. We call the three one on account of their unity in nature (there is truly one Godhead) and also their unity in energy (no one person acts alone, such that we cannot separate them and say that the Son is a God, only that the Son is God). This is what the Cappadocian Fathers taught about the trinity, like Gregory of Nyssa in his treatise Not Three Gods or St. Basil in his epistle 214
Life is well. I’ve been reading my way through John of Damascus’ philosophical chapters, a most excellent crash course on Greek philosophy up until the eighth century. How are you?Blessings my Orthodox brother. How is life treating you these days?
Wow! Sounds deep! I am doing okay,not great but hanging in there. All of these Sola Scriptura threads are making me dizzy…:whacky:Life is well. I’ve been reading my way through John of Damascus’ philosophical chapters, a most excellent crash course on Greek philosophy up until the eighth century. How are you?
No, because those three forms can exist simultaneously. The modalist view assumes that God changes form from one to another. I’m making the argument that the persons are all existing at the same time.The water analogy expresses a modalist view of God, which is heretical. I would not use that analogy if I were you. It just confuses people.
Paul