R
Regina7
Guest
VERY interesting! This is what I love about CAF.I don’t have my husband around to ask, but roughly speaking, in Catholic ethics, the person’s station in life is considered when figuring out what their moral duties are.
It’s kind of a hard thing to google, but here’s a short snippet that might help:
“Writing in the 1920s on “minimum and maximum
standards of living,” [Monsignor John A.] Ryan identified three levels of wealth and income: first, the “minimum necessary for decent livelihood,” second, “those things needed to maintain one’s current station in life,” and third, “income, goods, and services superfluous to maintaining that station.” Christians had the right to the first and second levels;
everything beyond this was superfluous, and should be used to alleviate neighbors’ needs.
Does 21st century Catholic social teaching maintain this right to a standard of living in
accordance with one’s station in life? If so, how can we interpret our station and its
limits in a consumerist economy wherein “standard of living” is a continually moving
target, and “superfluous income” often a virtually meaningless category? What,
concretely, does Catholic teaching and Christian discipleship require of we who are nonpoor, and called to solidarity with our neighbors in need?”
wwwdev.villanova.edu/content/villanova/mission/theoinstitute/conference/pastconferences/_jcr_content/pagecontent/download_5/file.res/2007.abstracts.pdf
That’s from a paper by Christine Firer Hinze
entitled “A Standard of Living in Accordance With One’s Station” and the Demands of
Solidarity: Tough Questions for 21st Century Disciples."
It’s an interesting problem, especially as it interacts with family size.
If your dh has anything to add later, please post