Thanks Deb for explaining:thumbsup: Yeah I wouldnt say grace alone either. I would lump grace and faith together and then say works is a result of the grace and faith.
Hey maybe because we are agreeing on much we can bring the 2 groups back together—LOL If only it were that simple
I wish it were so, but this IS where we do diverge. Catholics do believe in “grace alone” through Faith AND works. We don’t believe works are a
result of Faith. We believe Grace is the true gift and the acceptance of that gift has two
necessary parts.
Here’s an analogy that helped me understand the difference many years ago. Many people who say “Faith results in Works” can agree with the comparison of Grace being a gift, like a packaged gift, wrapped up beautifully with a bow. The analogy is that Faith is the acceptance of the gift and the Works are the opening the gift and using it.
The “Faith alone but results in Works” folks will argue that opening the gift is an automatic response to receiving the gift. Catholic teaching says, “not always so.” It often is but not always. The Faith alone folks will say that opening the gift is not necessary. They will say that because it is a gift (Grace) and we have received it in Faith that is enough. We will then show our thanks by opening it (works.) They will say that that opening it is not
necessary to completely receive it, and that it is a result of receiving it to open it.
True Story: A close relative was using this example to explain the difference to a “Faith results in Works” girlfriend. She was arguing that opening the gift was completely automatic. She said when one receives a gift one WILL open it. He was saying that it would seem logical that way, but it was not so. He said that accepting the gift (Faith) was
necessary and opening it (Works) was
necessary for the gift to be fully given and received. She could almost agree with that, but again said that opening it was automatic and someone would have to be insane to
accept a gift yet not open it, that opening happened no matter what, but it was not necessary to open it for the gift to be fully given and received anyway.
That Christmas her own son was going through a rebellious time and was very mad at her. He came to her house on Christmas and received all the gifts she gave him. He would not however, open them. He piled them in a corner unopened. She said that it almost hurt her more that he had received the gifts and left them unopened than it would have if he had rejected them outright. She said, “why did I bother giving them then?” My relative didn’t have the heart to remind her of their previous conversation while she was in such a vulnerable state. He accepted, but did not open, and she felt the giving was a waste because he didn’t open. She still holds to her “Faith results in Works” theology to this day. Now he did it out of anger, but the point was that we CAN still accept something and yet reject it by not opening it. AND that she felt the gifts were not received because they remained unopened.
All analogies are faulty on some level, but I hope this one can sort of explain it better.