V
Vera_Ljuba
Guest
Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
There are many God concepts. All of these concepts are man made. There is only one true God, no matter how many concepts are invented to describe Him.Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
I see the premise as faulty. You can ask one political party for its description of itself, and you can ask the opposition for their description. While not 100% analogous, it is close. With God, we have no such conundrum, for He has revealed His Truth. The fact that some do not agree does not affect the truth one whit.Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
Are you sure there are only 2?Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
Then doctrine is never revealed, and faith is simply an expression of an experience.There are many God concepts. All of these concepts are man made. There is only one true God, no matter how many concepts are invented to describe Him.
How does this follow from what I wrote?Are you sure there are only 2?
Then doctrine is never revealed, and faith is simply an expression of an experience.
No, because there are not two.Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
The God of Philosophers is immutable and does not change. However, although there are some passages in the Bible which indicate that God does not change, there are others which seem to say the contrary.Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
[SIGN]There is only one God.[/SIGN] The one God has revealed to us the truth regarding Him.Are you sure there are only 2?
Then doctrine is never revealed, and faith is simply an expression of an experience.
No.Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
[SIGN]There is only one God.[/SIGN] The one God has revealed to us the truth regarding Him.
Well, God of Revealion is more than merely the Scriptures, the Gospel is more than merely the gospels, but still, I understand what you mean.Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
Revelation is basically opposed to invention. If God teaches us things about Himself we can’t access by reason alone, then what He teaches is not simply something we “make up” to understand Him. Tower of Babel vs. Pentecost… Man going up to God, or God coming down to man.How does this follow from what I wrote?
Yes.[SIGN]There is only one God.[/SIGN] The one God has revealed to us the truth regarding Him.
Since invention is based on reason, according to John Paul II in Fides et Ratio, revelation and invention are complementary, not opposed.Revelation is basically opposed to invention. If God teaches us things about Himself we can’t access by reason alone, then what He teaches is not simply something we “make up” to understand Him. Tower of Babel vs. Pentecost… Man going up to God, or God coming down to man.
Yes.
Vera, what is your point? That they are not able to be reconciled? That is not exactly a theme left untreated in the early, medieval, modern, and contemporary Church. “What has Jerusalem to do with Athens,” quipped Tertullian, and we were off to the races. But Paul was debating with pagan Athenians well before that.
Yes I see the difference. That doesn’t mean there are two Gods though. It means different humans at different times viewed God differently. God is the same: all powerful, all good, all knowing. It is us humans who get everything mixed up! And even though I think the Bible is inspired by God I do not think everything in it should be taken literally. Do you?Yes, there are two God-concepts presented. One is the God of the Bible and the other one is the God of philosophers. Do you see the difference between them?
Some people do not see a satisfactory resolution of the question of how God can be immutable and not subject to change, when there are passages in Scripture that indicate otherwise. For another example, the wisdom and the knowledge of God are unlimited, but since his knowledge is unlimited, why would He regret having made man? And why would He change His mind?Vera, what is your point? That they are not able to be reconciled?
Maybe the words are being taken wooden literally rather than as the original author intended.Some people do not see a satisfactory resolution of the question of how God can be immutable and not subject to change, when there are passages in Scripture that indicate otherwise. For another example, the wisdom and the knowledge of God are unlimited, but since his knowledge is unlimited, why would He regret having made man? And why would He change His mind?
Because he actually does neither. These are anthropomorphisms used in scripture. Neither does God have wings, pinions, arms, or hands.Some people do not see a satisfactory resolution of the question of how God can be immutable and not subject to change, when there are passages in Scripture that indicate otherwise. For another example, the wisdom and the knowledge of God are unlimited, but since his knowledge is unlimited, why would He regret having made man? And why would He change His mind?
So those verses in Scripture that disagree with what the philosophers say about God are to be taken figuratively? This is what many Protestants say about how Roman Catholics take the words of Jesus in Consecrating the Bread and Wine. Many Protestants will say that these words are to be taken figuratively.Maybe the words are being taken wooden literally rather than as the original author intended.