It takes two to tango. The schism is from within the Church, not outside of it.
This is how Christians talk to one another?
He did make, change one thing into another, appoint, ordain the elements, so that in Martyrs words, they are “no longer ordinary bread and wine”, but representative of the body of Christ broken for us, and His shed blood of the new covenant…in short, consecration to that end.
It gets back to, you think they are both equalIf someone is a Byzantine Catholic, they have every right to refer themselves as “Orthodox in communion with Rome” since they share the same Liturgy, theology and spiritual life as the Orthodox.
steve-b:
It takes two to tango. The schism is from within the Church, not outside of it.
ZP
You’re conceding the point?No worries, but you keep pointing out you’re winning the argument, then take shots at people. There’s no need for your “blood to be up.”
He ordained His apostles to do the same as He did … to make the Eucharist happen out of bread and wine, just as Jesus did…steve-b:
He did make, change one thing into another, appoint,ordain the elements,so that in Martyrs words, they are “no longer ordinary bread and wine”, but representative of the body of Christ broken for us, and His shed blood of the new covenant…in short, consecration to that end.
Ok, i would agree to that addition, from my eucharistic point of view also.
Which point…the arrow points to response to steves post about definition of “do”…absolutely…i see it fits like a glove as i pointed out per my understanding also.
Except Re: secure & validsteve-b:
Ok, i would agree to that addition, from my eucharistic point of view also.
When considering conversion stories, THAT is one of many key points, people bring up.
Yep, that too
