The Universal Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter lanman87
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Since God can create everything by command, then WHY can’t you see that He can change bread and wine into His Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity by His Power?
I’ve had a hard time with this one, especially since Jesus said, “unless you eat my flesh you have no life in you.”

Couldn’t make sense of it since we’re all alive. Took me a while to understand he meant His Life.

Same thing with Adam & Eve. God said, “If you eat of the tree of knowledge you will surely die.” They ate the fruit & lived. But His life left them. The moment they ate.

True life. The life Jesus came so we could live it abundantly.
 
how could Our Lady be in opposition to the devil if she was subject to sin or ever sinned?
Reminds of Trump when he criticized McCain as not being a war hero, because after all, he got captured…

Or how about Christians who are not yet fully perfected or who were born in original sin, are they in league with the devil, not opposed to him, not at enmity ? Was Moses and Abraham , Daniel, Joseph, David ?

Why do you say two people have to be perfect for our Salvation, Mary and Jesus…is Pope Francis just plain wrong and “foolishness” when he said her propsed title of Co- Redemptrix would take glory or focus from Christ?
Does Scripture ever state she sinned?
Joseph, Daniel, Shadrach , Enoch, Elijah, Job etc, etc, etc…ditto
 
Last edited:
Yes, and God used them to carry out His plan for the world. Just as He used Mary.
Agree, and in Catholic thought, they cooperated with God, and in essence are also co redeemers…like Paul says, i become all things to all men so that some might be saved…he, we, take part in saving people, even though we all had original sin and then some…so to me doesnt make sense, that only someone perfect like Mary can be co redeemer , yet we also are used of God to save, though not perfect???
 
Last edited:
I’ve seen that before. That is a clever way of getting around the text.
You are being generous in saying it is clever! It actually makes no sense at all. The words within an example that incude the word “until” determine the meaning. For example: if on January 1, 2021 I am told I will not get out of jail until Janusary 1, 2022 it means something different than if I am told I won’t get out of jail until January 1, 3022.
 
then WHY can’t you see that He can change bread and wine into His Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity by His Power?
I think He can but that He didn’t. The reason being that He was in a Fully Human form and chose to remain that way until after the resurrection in order to be the perfect Sacrifice.
 
Let’s say you were accused of murdering your dad when you were 11 with a gun… You could reply: “I never shot a gun until I was 12…”
If someone told me that never shot a gun until they were 12 I would assume they shot a gun when they were 12. In that senario, It doesn’t make since to say “until I was 12”. It would make more sense to just say “I’ve never shot a gun” or “I’ve never shot a gun in my life”.
 
Correct, Until simply means a time period in which something happens or doesn’t happen that starts/stops when some action or circumstance changes. The circumstances and time period and what is starting/stopping are determined by the context of the sentence. If you read any of the Scripture Steve posted it is very easy to understand what time period and circumstances the “Until” is talking about.
 
Here is Psalm 69:9,
which we are told in gospels I believe references Jesus at the temple turning over tables if I recall correctly.

“For the zeal of thine house hath eaten me up; and the reproaches of them that reproached thee are fallen upon me.”

“And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up.” John 2:17

The previous verse 8 is this:

“I am become a stranger unto my brethren, and an alien unto my mother’s children.”
 
Last edited:
40.png
steve-b:
What part of no intercourse, yet conception happens, isn’t getting through ?
How many times did she conceive?..
Once
40.png
mcq72:
as many linear points she had no intercourse?
She was forever a virgin
 
40.png
steve-b:
The scripture you accept, came from the Catholic Church. If you now aren’t accepting the Authority of the Catholic Church, you then as a Protestant have nothing to point to for anything you base your belief system on.
Again weakest argument is one from authority, even one that is once right( scriptures) will always be right, even thousands years later.
show me where there is, or ever was, from the beginning, an infallible table of contents, listing by name, the books that are inspired scripture and only those books.

You can’t. It’s NOT there.

AND

As a Protestant, you have bible lite, short 7 books, removed by the heretic Luther in the 16th century when he printed his version of the bible.

So

How do you even know the books you have are scripture?

What authority do you point to for your answer?
 
Last edited:
Agreed, on linear timeline of one conception from one no intercourse phase.

Yet just from the above, to say that further down timeline there was intercourse and conception is not contradictory and possible, as much as not.
She was forever a virgin
Yes, that is one of the widely held beliefs, but you don’t get that from " one conception connected to no intercourse text. It neither contradicts nor fully facilitates. It is only one smaller portion of Mary’s timeline, marked by the famous “until”( which is another discussion).
 
Last edited:
40.png
steve-b:
Agreed, on linear timeline of one conception from one no intercourse phase.

Yet just from the above, to say that further down timeline there was intercourse and conception is not contradictory and possible, as much as not.
Mary, mother of God, is ever virgin.
 
How do you even know the books you have are scripture?

What authority do you point to for your answer?
I do not buck the church authority to do this just as you do not buck authority that indeed now God does draw us internally also to the truth on the matter.
 
40.png
steve-b:
How do you even know the books you have are scripture?

What authority do you point to for your answer?
I do not buck the church authority to do this just as you do not buck authority that indeed now God does draw us internally also to the truth on the matter.*
Seems like a big move on your part to say that. Just sayin 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top