The 'W" Questions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We are born in a sinful condition. Infants, the mentally handicapped…all of humanity. The wages of sin is death. Everyone dies. Otherwise, why baptize them?

No, it doesn’t, but the rest of Scripture does. We can’t separate the parts from the whole. No exception is made for anyone else in all of Scripture.
Jesus died on the cross. Unscramble that one.
 
Easy. She’s not our mother. She’s Jesus’ earthly mother. And to reply to MrZetterlund, Revelation speaks mostly of future events. To say that the woman is Mary and not the church is a big stretch.
To understand Mary you have to understand the Old Testament. The Old Testament Kingdom reveals when you hear in the NT, the Kingdom of God is at hand. Every Jew in those days…would say huh…an heir of David…the Davidic Kingdom…He is the King and Mary his mother the Gabira and Peter the Prime Minister…and the apostles are what…

Fact. Paul made it clear to the Jews that they were not descendants of Abraham rather they were descendants of Adam. Want to dispute that you too are a descendant of Adam?

If Jesus is the first born of all Creation, the new Adam and we are children of God then He is our brother and since Mary is His mother she too is our mother spiritually. Want to dispute that Jesus is our brother?

not such a big stretch.🙂
 
To understand Mary you have to understand the Old Testament. The Old Testament Kingdom reveals when you hear in the NT, the Kingdom of God is at hand. Every Jew in those days…would say huh…an heir of David…the Davidic Kingdom…He is the King and Mary his mother the Gabira and Peter the Prime Minister…and the apostles are what…

Fact. Paul made it clear to the Jews that they were not descendants of Abraham rather they were descendants of Adam. Want to dispute that you too are a descendant of Adam?

If Jesus is the first born of all Creation, the new Adam and we are children of God then He is our brother and since Mary is His mother she too is our mother spiritually. Want to dispute that Jesus is our brother?

not such a big stretch.🙂
Sighs I’ve had my fill of Mary. Obviously we won’t see eye to eye on this matter. But, Mary isn’t the only thing that I see wrong that will keep me from joining. When I first joined this board, I had intended to convert, but after reading many posts, and threads and through much prayer, I’ve decided that it’s not the best course of interest for me.
 
Sighs I’ve had my fill of Mary. Obviously we won’t see eye to eye on this matter. But, Mary isn’t the only thing that I see wrong that will keep me from joining. When I first joined this board, I had intended to convert, but after reading many posts, and threads and through much prayer, I’ve decided that it’s not the best course of interest for me.
Then you should not join. Do not discuss Mary any more as you have had your fill.🙂
 
The universal church held Mary as sinless in its earliest times…but it took 1800 years to declare her as such…so that is a long time to put thought into…

Mr. Zetterlund…you can do something about this accusation of being a Mary worshipper…look up the First Five Saturdays as reparation to the blasphemies against Mary…you can only say so much…

Hold on to your peace, let nothing disturb it…but you can do something about it…by practicing the devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary…I am trying to go back to this devotion…to make up for those who do not love her or acknowledge her true dignity…
Thank you very much for your faith, recommendations and support. God bless you, Kathleen. 🙂
 
Marianity… I’ll have to remember that one. :rolleyes:
Mariology is Christocentric. Everything about her points to Christ.

Why don’t fundamentalists honor their mother?
“All generations will call me Blessed”

We should NEVER forget our Blessed Mother and by praying to her we honor her. She will always lead us to Christ.

🙂

MJ
 
Mary. She was a sinner, saved by her son’s grace…
If Mary was a sinner, not preserved from original sin, then Jesus should have inherited that sinfulness even if He was conceived by the Holy Spirit. But He’s unblemished and without sin!
 
There are some who hold to it as a pious tradition. I am not opposed to that. I don’t think it’s an accurate viewpoint, but would not say dogmatically that she either sinned or didn’t sin. I was mainly just addressing your statement of the mentally handicapped and infants, and also the point of Christ being an exception to the “all have sinned” passage.
 
=IggyAntiochus;9119825]We are born in a sinful condition. Infants, the mentally handicapped…all of humanity. The wages of sin is death. Everyone dies. Otherwise, why baptize them?
No, it doesn’t, but the rest of Scripture does. We can’t separate the parts from the whole. No exception is made for anyone else in all of Scripture.
My friend,

Your second quoted position requires that I ask if you yourself believe what you said; how then can you NOT be a Catholic?🤷

God Bless you,
Pat
 
=MrZetterlund;9120002]batman1973, I don’t see how saying it is Mary rather than the Church is a “big stretch,” especially since I’ve never given birth to Christ and then had the devil kill thousands of children in search of mine. I think what I said was misunderstood when I said, “If I were to reject Catholicism on the basis of Marian doctrines, then I would see no reason to bother with Christianity at all.” I say this because 1500 years ago, it would be unthinkable to have this debate, and thats how it was since the religion first started. Jesus gave the “keys to the kingdom” to His Church. The Church is the kingdom of heaven on earth, what we do here is bound in heaven and loosed, we are the physical means of comming to God in this world. If we err in our teachings then Christ has failed.
So your saying that Christ gave EVERYBODY the keys to the kingdom of heaven referencing Mt. 16:15-19?

Just how my friend do you reach this conclusion?🤷

God Bless you,
Pat
 
For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. - 2 Cor 5:21
So then might I conclude that God can create a human being that is without sin?

May I conclude that you pointed out that the wages of sin is death and that death does not necessarily equate to one with sin?

Are you OK with that?🙂
 
If you are still here, Batman, to get more perspective…our devotion to Mary comes out of the Ecclesia…how people looked at Mary way back then…how they related to her…they so close to the historical and saving and redeeming event of Christ…this is in part Tradition.

Tradition is so necessary because the universal faith reached the universal man…and through the Apostles’ teachings and witness of knowing Christ personally for 3 and a half years…people implemented their faith into church practices and customs…the latter being small ‘t’ traditions.

But the understanding of faith through the apostles…and how people put into practice is indeed Tradition. You may be dealing with fundamentalist type indoctrination that fed on people’s ignorance of ancient Christianity…our roots.

But to understand Mary…it is best we understand her from the source, – the Ecclesia…the source…the communion of believers and a growing discipline in the understanding of spirituality and walk.

If you want to know more about Mary that is in a way better received, why not go to a Catholic church that has strong Marian devotion…and witness the believers’ faith; speak to them how they live out this faith in Christ through Mary.

You are not getting a full perspective of Catholicism here on CAF…you have to go out and be in a Catholic parish for awhile…
 
=CopticChristian;9121393]So then might I conclude that God can create a human being that is without sin?
May I conclude that you pointed out that the wages of sin is death and that death does not necessarily equate to one with sin?
Are you OK with that?🙂
IF I MAY INTERJECT:)

God could BUT that does not meet with God’s plan for OUR creation. He did create all of the angels, and both adam and Eve without sin; BUT [a VERY IMPORTANT BUT] in a manner that permitted them to personally choose to DENY GOD and therefore greviously sin.

By virtue of our Godly emmulation of the SPIRITUAL GIFTS of a minf, intellect and freewill which are permnantly attached to our SPIRITUAL Souls; we are able to make the same choses; but have a “natural” propensitiy to sin that the others did not have.

As to your second point: This “death” referencd in this pasage is a SPIRITUAL Death; NOT a physical death. For the Spirit can commit “spiritual sucide” by denying God and by disobeying God; where the peanly [depending on the gravity of the sin] couls commit one to eternal hell [which IS SPIROTUAL DEATH].:o

God Bless,
Pat
 
IF I MAY INTERJECT:)

God could BUT that does not meet with God’s plan for OUR creation. He did create all of the angels, and both adam and Eve without sin; BUT [a VERY IMPORTANT BUT] in a manner that permitted them to personally choose to DENY GOD and therefore greviously sin.

By virtue of our Godly emmulation of the SPIRITUAL GIFTS of a minf, intellect and freewill which are permnantly attached to our SPIRITUAL Souls; we are able to make the same choses; but have a “natural” propensitiy to sin that the others did not have.

As to your second point: This “death” referencd in this pasage is a SPIRITUAL Death; NOT a physical death. For the Spirit can commit “spiritual sucide” by denying God and by disobeying God; where the peanly [depending on the gravity of the sin] couls commit one to eternal hell [which IS SPIROTUAL DEATH].:o

God Bless,
Pat
Pat,

You are answering me and that is noble. You attempt to clarify for me and that is admirable. I suggest you look back at the origin of the discussion. It was Iggy that suggested that the wages of sin is death. Your intervening obviates the ability of Iggy to express thoughts. I suggest you hold back on explaining to me and read where the posts are going. I was not looking for an explanation for me. I was trying to get at what Iggy was thinking. If you believe that you have aided that intent then bless you.🙂
 
=CopticChristian;9122153]Pat,
You are answering me and that is noble. You attempt to clarify for me and that is admirable. I suggest you look back at the origin of the discussion. It was Iggy that suggested that the wages of sin is death. Your intervening obviates the ability of Iggy to express thoughts. I suggest you hold back on explaining to me and read where the posts are going. I was not looking for an explanation for me. I was trying to get at what Iggy was thinking. If you believe that you have aided that intent then bless you.🙂
OK:blush:
 
Mary. She was a sinner, saved by her son’s grace. The bible makes it clear that ALL have sinned. I’ve said it lots of times before, she is blessed, but deserves no veneration and defiantly not a co-mediatrix or co- repdeprtress status. Christ and Christ alone is our Sole mediator and redeemer. Also, hell is a real physical, unpleasesnt place. Other than, I can’t think of much else. But, that alone is what’s gonna keep me out. I’ve prayed hard about it, and the Spirit tells me these are false teachings and to avoid them.
What the heck kind of Bible are YOU READING?!? Mary is considered to be the Immaculate Conception…Born without the stain of original sin first off. Second she DOES deserve to be venerated because God chose her to be born without sin to be the perfected human flesh to carry and give birth to Jesus the Son of God. In honoring Mary the CC is following the example of God Himself. Mary’s special privlidges were not bestowed upon her by man, but by God.

Mary was not a sinner, Mary Magdelane was a sinner. Mary did not need saved by her son, She was created as holy and spotless- without ANY sin as it comes. God [Christ] can only be born of a woman of Mary’s spotless, sinless holiest nature to come into this world to be made man, be crucified and die on a cross for the inequities of other sinners in this world. Christ is God Incarnate By denying the Mother of God [Christ] you also are saying that Jesus is not God, or that Jesus is two persons, one divine and one human. When the eternal Son of God became flesh, He assumed Human nature. Which made it possible to be born of a woman just as we are born of our mothers wombs.
 
Batman1973,
We call Mary the Moher of God because she gave birth to Jesus. Jesus IS God, the second person in the Trinity. Jesus is true God and true man in ONE divine Person Mary did not exist before God either, Jesus is the Son of the Almighty God from all of eternity, who also became the Son of the Blessed Virgin Mary in time.

I hope this answers some questions.
Peace be with you
 
What the heck kind of Bible are YOU READING?!? Mary is considered to be the Immaculate Conception…Born without the stain of original sin first off. Second she DOES deserve to be venerated because God chose her to be born without sin to be the perfected human flesh to carry and give birth to Jesus the Son of God. In honoring Mary the CC is following the example of God Himself. Mary’s special privlidges were not bestowed upon her by man, but by God.

Mary was not a sinner, Mary Magdelane was a sinner. Mary did not need saved by her son, She was created as holy and spotless- without ANY sin as it comes. God [Christ] can only be born of a woman of Mary’s spotless, sinless holiest nature to come into this world to be made man, be crucified and die on a cross for the inequities of other sinners in this world. Christ is God Incarnate By denying the Mother of God [Christ] you also are saying that Jesus is not God, or that Jesus is two persons, one divine and one human. When the eternal Son of God became flesh, He assumed Human nature. Which made it possible to be born of a woman just as we are born of our mothers wombs.
This reminds me of the absolutely OLDEST reason and Scriptural basis for the belief in Marys Immaculate Conception!! I first recognized it in my PROTESTANT NKJV Jon McAuthur study Bible. In Luke 1:28, whenever the angel Gabriel says, “Rejoice, highly favored one,” McAuthor, a PROTESTANT Bible commentator, was quick to point out that “highly favored one,” in the Koine Greek literally means, “Full of grace.” He was then quick to say, “This portrays Mary as a recipient, not a dispenser of grace.” And thats exactly correct. (She is also, however, also a despensor of grace, since she literally dispenced from her womb Grace Himself.) :rolleyes: But I believe it was St. Augustine who made the point that, “And when there is talk of sin and Our Lady, there shall be none, for the Scriptures call her “full of grace,” and how much grace are we to say that God has given her?” And he’s exactly right. No one can sin and be “full of grace.” Even if it said “state of grace,” it would be a different story, because forgiveness is not conditional, but is the condition of the believer, sin our no sin. However, one cannot allow themselves to be FULL of grace and continue to sin. If we actually allowed ourselves to be “full of grace” then would NEVER sin…
 
This reminds me of the absolutely OLDEST reason and Scriptural basis for the belief in Marys Immaculate Conception!! I first recognized it in my PROTESTANT NKJV Jon McAuthur study Bible. In Luke 1:28, whenever the angel Gabriel says, “Rejoice, highly favored one,” McAuthor, a PROTESTANT Bible commentator, was quick to point out that “highly favored one,” in the Koine Greek literally means, “Full of grace.” He was then quick to say, “This portrays Mary as a recipient, not a dispenser of grace.” And thats exactly correct. (She is also, however, also a despensor of grace, since she literally dispenced from her womb Grace Himself.) :rolleyes: But I believe it was St. Augustine who made the point that, “And when there is talk of sin and Our Lady, there shall be none, for the Scriptures call her “full of grace,” and how much grace are we to say that God has given her?” And he’s exactly right. No one can sin in a state of grace.
I was hoping someone would agree with me on this one! 😃
Bless You,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top