The Wedding of Jesus

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Masada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your obsession of Paul has nothing to do with Paul’s teachings. In fact Paul who was Saul was a persecuter of Christians.
One does not found a religion to persecute the adepts. Paul founded Christianity in Antioch about 30 years after Jesus had been gone. He never persecuted a single Christian. Pick up your NT and prove it to me. Read Acts 11:26.
Did you approve of Paul’s actions and teachings about the Law then?
No. He contradicted Jesus himself who declared that he had not come to abolish the Law. (Mat. 5:17) To contradict him, Paul declared that he indeed abolished the Law in his flesh on the cross. (Ephes. 2:15) To contradict is to be against or anti. If you believe that Jesus was Christ, it won’t be too hard to figure what Paul was.
No, Paul obeyed God not man! Paul sacrificed his whole career and life for the “Truth” of God.
Thousands of the Habai faith in Iran at the time of Aiatolla Homenni also sacrificed their lives without retracting. Hundreds of Muslims also sacrifice their lives for what they believe is the truth. So, what does it prove?
Paul proved he obeyed and Loved God with all his heart, mind and strength by loving his enemies the Gentiles a “true” teaching of Jesus Christ.
Give me a quotation in your own NT of when Paul decided to leave the Jews alone and went to the Gentiles. If to love the Gentiles was a “true” teaching of Jesus, why would he advise his disciples not to take his gospel to the Gentiles? (Mat. 10:6)
Tell me Ben do you love God as to love Gentiles as yourself? as the first century Jewish Pharisee Paul did?
No one can love another as him or herself. That’s a cop-out of Pauline rhetoric. Besides, there is no such a thing as a commandment to love. Though under the word love, but the commandment is to respect. We can be commanded to respect but not to love. Love is an emotion, a feeling. One cannot be commanded to feel. Even with reference to God, the word love means knowledge. The more we know about God the more love grows.

Ben: 🙂
 
One does not found a religion to persecute the adepts. Paul founded Christianity in Antioch about 30 years after Jesus had been gone. He never persecuted a single Christian. Pick up your NT and prove it to me. Read Acts 11:26.

Ben: 🙂
Read Acts chapter 9 for Saul/Paul’s conversion
 
Great Job Ben; Koodo’s to you:) For clarification you did not convert Christians. Seventh day adventist are not Christian as they claim to be. These claim to the seventh day Sabbath Rest as their mark from God. If you can covert these to their wish of honoring the Sabbath I see a happy ending for both sides. But now they have to deny Jesus Christ as their Lord and God and replace him with a day to honor? See why these are not considered Christians. A Christian is one who lives and dies for his Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, just like Paul, Peter, Barnabas, James and all the other saints and martyrs to date in the Catholic church.
Be sure that I am well aware of this grudge between you two: Catholics and Adventists. You claim they are not Christians and they claim things even worse about you. I think you know what I am arriving at. What they did was to exchange a two thousand years old dead savior for what Isaiah says in Isaiah 43:11. God Himself, the only Savior and Redeemer of Israel. Who alone made all things. (Isa. 44:24) The One Who, according to Isaiah 46:5, cannot be compared with an equal or be matched against as though they were alike.

Ben: 🙂
 
Thousands of the Habai faith in Iran at the time of Aiatolla Homenni also sacrificed their lives without retracting. Hundreds of Muslims also sacrifice their lives for what they believe is the truth. So, what does it prove?

Gabriel of 12:
This is the fundamental difference of sacrificial martyrdom between Christians and Muslims. Muslims martyr themselves in an act of suicide to do harm to his enemies.
All Christian Martyrs went to their deaths willingly and with pslams, and placed themselves as victims “not suicide” for love of their enemies. Research and you will find what I tell you is historical fact.

Peace be with you
 
yes, thanks. Paul and saul are the same person. Name is change to disconnect saul fromhis previous bad deeds. I do not go much for the acts because they do not belong to Jesus.
When Jesus chose Simon as His disciple, he was given a new name , Cephas, Peter, the rock. Peter had been a fisherman, not exactly a bad deed to earn one’s living as a fisherman. The idea of new names is about acquiring a new identity based on spiritual parenthood, moving beyond biological identification alone.
 
Be sure that I am well aware of this grudge between you two: Catholics and Adventists. You claim they are not Christians and they claim things even worse about you. I think you know what I am arriving at. What they did was to exchange a two thousand years old dead savior for what Isaiah says in Isaiah 43:11. God Himself, the only Savior and Redeemer of Israel. Who alone made all things. (Isa. 44:24) The One Who, according to Isaiah 46:5, cannot be compared with an equal or be matched against as though they were alike.

Ben: 🙂
The difference is you believe God is dead, I believe God still lives. Catholics do not disagree with Isaiah nor his prophecies, Isaiah nailed every one of his prophecies according to Jesus Christ.
 
What they did was to exchange a two thousand years old dead savior for what Isaiah says in Isaiah 43:11. God Himself, the only Savior and Redeemer of Israel. Who alone made all things. (Isa. 44:24) The One Who, according to Isaiah 46:5, cannot be compared with an equal or be matched against as though they were alike.

Ben: 🙂
Hasn’t anyone told you? He rose from the dead, He put death to death. Jesus lives!!!
 
Read Acts chapter 9 for Saul/Paul’s conversion
You err for not knowing your own NT. Acts 9 is about Paul’s famous change of mind. And I tell you which people he was on his way to Damascus to arrest. They were those in the synagogues living according to the New Way. Who could they be,
Christians? Think again because Christians started about 5 years
later with him in Antioch. (Acts 11:26)

Those in the synagogues of Damascus could not be regular Jews because he would not get letters from Jerusalem to persecute Jews. They were the Nazarenes, followers of the New Way, a name given to the Nazarenes. (Acts 9:2) Read more carefully.

Do you want another proof of what I am saying? When he decided to come up to Jerusalem to join the Sect of the Nazarnes, the Nazarenes rejected him, afraid for his history of persecutions in Damascus. As you can see, those who were living according to the New Way were not Christians but Nazarenes.

Ben: 🙂
 
The difference is you believe God is dead, I believe God still lives. Catholics do not disagree with Isaiah nor his prophecies, Isaiah nailed every one of his prophecies according to Jesus Christ.
Assumptions butter no bread. If you open the very first page of Isaiah, the very first verse, you will see in Isaiah 1:1 that the whole of his book is about Judah and Jerusalem, and not about Jesus.

Ben: 🙂
 
You err for not knowing your own NT. Acts 9 is about Paul’s famous change of mind. And I tell you which people he was on his way to Damascus to arrest. They were those in the synagogues living according to the New Way. Who could they be,
Christians? Think again because Christians started about 5 years
later with him in Antioch. (Acts 11:26)

Those in the synagogues of Damascus could not be regular Jews because he would not get letters from Jerusalem to persecute Jews. They were the Nazarenes, followers of the New Way, a name given to the Nazarenes. (Acts 9:2) Read more carefully.

Do you want another proof of what I am saying? When he decided to come up to Jerusalem to join the Sect of the Nazarnes, the Nazarenes rejected him, afraid for his history of persecutions in Damascus. As you can see, those who were living according to the New Way were not Christians but Nazarenes.

Ben: 🙂
Referring to themselves, the name used in the early Christian community was The Way.
Acts 18:26 19:9 22:4 24:14
 
Ben Masada;4881701:
Thousands of the Habai faith in Iran at the time of Aiatolla Homenni also sacrificed their lives without retracting. Hundreds of Muslims also sacrifice their lives for what they believe is the truth. So, what does it prove?
Gabriel of 12:
This is the fundamental difference of sacrificial martyrdom between Christians and Muslims. Muslims martyr themselves in an act of suicide to do harm to his enemies.
All Christian Martyrs went to their deaths willingly and with pslams, and placed themselves as victims “not suicide” for love of their enemies. Research and you will find what I tell you is historical fact.

Peace be with you

And when Christian Monks would push crucifixes unto the faces of Jews being burned alive in the Catholic “Autos-da-Fe” of the Inquisition, was that Christian love for their victims? God keep me from such a love!

Ben: 🙂
 
One does not found a religion to persecute the adepts. Paul founded Christianity in Antioch about 30 years after Jesus had been gone. He never persecuted a single Christian. Pick up your NT and prove it to me. Read Acts 11:26.

Gabriel of 12:

Ben please read carefully. you will see Saul now Paul was a persecuter of Christians who converted to “The Way”.

Acts. 9:11
The Lord said to him, “Get up and go to the street called Straight and ask at the house of Judas for a man from Tarsus named Saul. He is there praying,
12
and (in a vision) he has seen a man named Ananias come in and lay (his) hands on him, that he may regain his sight.”
13
**But Ananias replied, “Lord, I have heard from many sources about this man, what evil things he has done to your holy ones 4 in Jerusalem.
14
And here he has authority from the chief priests to imprison all who call upon your name.” **
15
But the Lord said to him, “Go, for this man is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before Gentiles, kings, and Israelites,
16
and I will show him what he will have to suffer for my name.” **
17
So Ananias went and entered the house; laying his hands on him, he said, “Saul, my brother, the Lord has sent me, Jesus who appeared to you on the way by which you came, that you may regain your sight and be filled with the holy Spirit.”
18
Immediately things like scales fell from his eyes and he regained his sight. He got up and was baptized,
19
and when he had eaten, he recovered his strength. 5 He stayed some days with the disciples in Damascus,
20
and
he began at once to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God. 6
21
All who heard him were astounded and said, “Is not this the man who in Jerusalem ravaged those who call upon this name, and came here expressly to take them back in chains to the chief priests?” **
22
**But Saul grew all the stronger and confounded (the) Jews who lived in Damascus, proving that this is the Messiah. **
23
After a long time had passed, the Jews conspired to kill him,
24
but their plot became known to Saul. Now they were keeping watch on the gates day and night so as to kill him,
25
but his disciples took him one night and let him down through an opening in the wall, lowering him in a basket.
26
**When he arrived in Jerusalem 7 he tried to join the disciples, but they were all afraid of him, not believing that he was a disciple. **

Ben:
No. He contradicted Jesus himself who declared that he had not come to abolish the Law. (Mat. 5:17) To contradict him, Paul declared that he indeed abolished the Law in his flesh on the cross. (Ephes. 2:15) To contradict is to be against or anti. If you believe that Jesus was Christ, it won’t be too hard to figure what Paul was.

Gabriel of 12:

Ok Ben; there is no contradiction of these two scriptures of Jesus and Paul. Pleas stop repeating this; Jesus speaks from Mathew that he came not to abolish the law but to fulfill the Law.

Paul in Ephesians is teaching that Jesus by his death and resurrection has abolished the Legal claims of the law that kept the dividing wall between Gentiles and Jews, this Jesus abolished such laws with its legal claims that kept seperating Jews and Gentiles. This Jesus brought Peace not a division that the law brought between Jews and Gentiles, this is the abolishment.

Ben:
Give me a quotation in your own NT of when Paul decided to leave the Jews alone and went to the Gentiles. If to love the Gentiles was a “true” teaching of Jesus, why would he advise his disciples not to take his gospel to the Gentiles? (Mat. 10:6)

Gabriel of 12:
Sure read all of Acts of the Apostles chapt. 9
Jesus when he first commissioned the disciples he was fulfilling a prophecy that the kingdom of God must be preached to Jerusalem first then the Gentiles. Here is Jesus again when he resurrected from the dead he commanded his disciples after he recieved all the power in heaven and on earth,now to got out: Mathew 28;18
11 Then Jesus approached and said to them, **“All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
19
Go, therefore, 12 and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,
20
teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. 13 And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age.” **

Ben:
No one can love another as him or herself. That’s a cop-out of Pauline rhetoric. Besides, there is no such a thing as a commandment to love. Though under the word love, but the commandment is to respect. We can be commanded to respect but not to love. Love is an emotion, a feeling. One cannot be commanded to feel. Even with reference to God, the word love means knowledge. The more we know about God the more love grows.

Gabriel of 12:
Here is Jesus teaching on love of enemies. Remember God is Love! where you get these fuzzy feelings to describe God sounds like the SDA’s are influencing your religion. Because True Christianity does not deal with Fuzzy loving feelings as a truth as you describe. Here is Jesus;
**Mathew 6:43
27 "You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
44
But I say to you, love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you, **45
that you may be children of your heavenly Father, for he makes his sun rise on the bad and the good, and causes rain to fall on the just and the unjust.
46
For if you love those who love you, what recompense will you have? Do not the tax collectors 28 do the same?
47
And if you greet your brothers only, what is unusual about that? Do not the pagans do the same? 29
48
So be perfect, 30 just as your heavenly Father is perfect.
 
Assumptions butter no bread. If you open the very first page of Isaiah, the very first verse, you will see in Isaiah 1:1 that the whole of his book is about Judah and Jerusalem, and not about Jesus.

Ben: 🙂
We differ again, naturally, the passion, death and glorification is fulfilled in Christ.
 
Gabriel of 12;4881719:
And when Christian Monks would push crucifixes unto the faces of Jews being burned alive in the Catholic “Autos-da-Fe” of the Inquisition, was that Christian love for their victims? God keep me from such a love!

Ben: 🙂
Gabriel of 12:

Oh, were these the same Jews who secretly entered the Catholic priesthood inorder to destroy the Catholic church from within and got exposed or excommunicated? Are we going to exchange fact for fact, or learn from our experiences as a people and grow. I dont agree with this tag game. I am here to correct any misgiving you have about my Jesus and Catholic faith, and Ben you have alot of misgivings of my Catholic faith, I hope you continue here.

Peace be with you
 
Referring to themselves, the name used in the early Christian community was The Way.
Acts 18:26 19:9 22:4 24:14
From Acts 24:14, I came to understand that Paul was lying when he decided to call also Christianity the new way. Why? Because he declares that “He believed all that’s written in the Law and the Prophets.” That’s a lie because Kashrut is written in the Law, and he abolished Kashrut. (I Cor. 10:25,26) The Sabbath is written in the Law and he considered the Sabbath as shadows of things to come, and said that one is free to choose any day to keep it holy or no day at all. (Col. 2:16,17; Rom. 14:5) Therefore, contradictions in the NT.

Besides, he would teach the Jews to abandon Moses, to give up the circumcision of their children and to renounce the Jewish customs. Read Acts 21:21. Then, last but not least, he contradicted Jesus himself when this said he had not come to abolish the Law. (Mat. 5:17) And Paul declares that’s not true. That he did come to abolish the Law in his flesh on the cross. Therefore, the man has lost all credibility to be trusted in anything he said. To contradict is to go against or be anti. If you believe Jesus was Christ, it’s not too hard to figure what was Paul.

Ben: 🙂
 
Ben Masada;4881768:
Gabriel of 12:

Oh, were these the same Jews who secretly entered the Catholic priesthood inorder to destroy the Catholic church from within and got exposed or excommunicated? Are we going to exchange fact for fact, or learn from our experiences as a people and grow. I dont agree with this tag game. I am here to correct any misgiving you have about my Jesus and Catholic faith, and Ben you have alot of misgivings of my Catholic faith, I hope you continue here.

Peace be with you
To begin with, let me remind you that this of the forum is a non-Catholic section. If you as a Catholic can’t handle
the truth, I think you must be the one who should not continue here. Then, to burn one alive because he attacks the Church with arguments is no reason for such a cruelty.

Now, about who is here to correct misgivings, let me ask you a question. Do you believe Jesus was Jewish? I am sure you do. Therefore, if I am interpreting Jesus according to being Jewish, I think the misgivings are yours and not mine.

Ben: 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top