The Wedding of Jesus

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Masada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
LilyM, that spear-piercing at Jesus’ side was never done. I am not going to repeat here, but I request that you read my thread on that wound which was never done. Be the first!
I have just posted it.

Ben: 🙂 🙂
Hi

Sorry, I didn’t know that LilyM was to be the first in your new thread; not knowingly I posted earlier. Nevermind, her posts whenever she writes should be considered with preference over me. I am not jealous of her.

I love Jesus and Mary

Thanks
 
PaarSurrey, what about answering all the questions I asked you first?
 
I thought PaarSurrey was bad enough with Jesus having multiple wives and running away with them to Kashmir etc. Now you are even one better. Jesus marrying His mother! :rolleyes:
or you can not be a literalist and understand that nuns take the Lord Jesus Christ as their spouse in this same way, but will never reach this type of union like the Blessed Virgin did.
 
or you can not be a literalist and understand that nuns take the Lord Jesus Christ as their spouse in this same way, but will never reach this type of union like the Blessed Virgin did.
If you think the non-literalist version of a Mother-Son relationship is the same as the nuns accepting Jesus as their spiritual Spouse, then something is really distorted with your understanding of human relationships. Of course Mother Mary had a literal biological relationship with Jesus because biologically He was her Son. But Christianity is primarily about spiritual relationships.
 
If you think the non-literalist version of a Mother-Son relationship is the same as the nuns accepting Jesus as their spiritual Spouse, then something is really distorted with your understanding of human relationships. Of course Mother Mary had a literal biological relationship with Jesus because biologically He was her Son. But Christianity is primarily about spiritual relationships.
No, nobody thinks its the same buddy.
 
Hi

You mean Jesus and Mary Magdalene? Have I understood you correctly?

I love Jesus and Mary

Thanks
PaarSurrey, it is not the Muslim version of Jesus and Mary Magalene as His wife. Chaldean Rite wrote about the Blessed Virgin. In Christianity it refers to the Mother of Jesus.
 
Chaldean Rite and PaarSurrey, I’m not well versed in the art of debate with heretics. I think this website should have a special forum titled: Heretics & Co.

Btw, I’m female. I have no problem being mistaken for a male because I share my ideas without giving any indication of my gender, but I prefer not being directly addressed as a male.
 
I thought PaarSurrey was bad enough with Jesus having multiple wives and running away with them to Kashmir etc. Now you are even one better. Jesus marrying His mother! :rolleyes:
Hi

I take refuge in GodAllahYHWH;**Chaldean Rite **is no different, I think all Christians without realizing, logically mean the same thing.

They believe that Jesus was from the beginning a god; it is only Paul’s strange philosophy that invented a Catholic-father-god, just to avoid the shame involved, in my opinion. Kindly think; what is a begotten Son; if Jesus was before Mary. The same what our friend **Chaldean Rite **has said and you object to.

I don’t believe in such odd things, sorry, no compulsion.

i love Jesus and Mary

Thanks
 
Are you calling me a heretic?
When you write that Jesus and his biological mother, Mary, are the new Adam and Eve, then what else am I to conclude. It beats most of the crazy ideas one gets to hear from non-Christians. See how fertile an imagination PaarSurrey and Ben Masada have. You beat them hollow.
 
When you write that Jesus and his biological mother, Mary, are the new Adam and Eve, then what else am I to conclude. It beats most of the crazy ideas one gets to hear from non-Christians. See how fertile an imagination PaarSurrey and Ben Masada have. You beat them hollow.
You never heard of Jesus as the New Adam and Mary as the New Eve?
 
When you write that Jesus and his biological mother, Mary, are the new Adam and Eve, then what else am I to conclude. It beats most of the crazy ideas one gets to hear from non-Christians. See how fertile an imagination PaarSurrey and Ben Masada have. You beat them hollow.
**505 **By his virginal conception, Jesus, the New Adam, ushers in the new birth of children adopted in the Holy Spirit through faith. “How can this be?” Participation in the divine life arises “not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God”. The acceptance of this life is virginal because it is entirely the Spirit’s gift to man. The spousal character of the human vocation in relation to God is fulfilled perfectly in Mary’s virginal motherhood.

975 "We believe that the Holy Mother of God, the new Eve, Mother of the Church, continues in heaven to exercise her maternal role on behalf of the members of Christ" (Paul VI, *CPG *§ 15).

Got it?
 
**505 **By his virginal conception, Jesus, the New Adam, ushers in the new birth of children adopted in the Holy Spirit through faith. “How can this be?” Participation in the divine life arises “not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God”. The acceptance of this life is virginal because it is entirely the Spirit’s gift to man. The spousal character of the human vocation in relation to God is fulfilled perfectly in Mary’s virginal motherhood.

975 "We believe that the Holy Mother of God, the new Eve, Mother of the Church, continues in heaven to exercise her maternal role on behalf of the members of Christ" (Paul VI, *CPG *§ 15).

Got it?
Don’t forget your mention of Jesus and Mary as the New Adam and New Eve was in connection with a relationship between them, as the wedding at Cana being about the wedding of Jesus and Mary. Wedding of Mother and Son?

Here the talk is about the relationship of Jesus to the Church, the body of believers, and of Mary to the body of believers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top