These are the Jews you follow for your Canon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotWorthy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And the greek septuagint, which was translated by jewish scholars 200 years before Christ, uses virgin. So, this wasn’t just ‘made up’ by Christians looking for a prophecy to mess with.
Thanks for that point! I often forget that the Septuagint was commissioned by the Jews so that they could understand the Scriptures more clearly. It seems only the Jews in Judea could read Hebrew (with a few exceptions here and there).
 
Notworthy,

I just crossed referenced Isaiah 7:14 on biblegateway.com and out of 6 protestant bible translations I only found 1 that did this.

So actually who are Steve Ray and yourself focusing on?

🤷
 
Notworthy,

I just crossed referenced Isaiah 7:14 on biblegateway.com and out of 6 protestant bible translations I only found 1 that did this.

So actually who are Steve Ray and yourself focusing on?

🤷
My focus is not Isaiah 7:14 at all. It was just an example to show that the council of Jamnia “bent the rules” in their interpretation of the Scripture in order to downplay the allusions to the Messiah.

My question to those that took the Deutero-canonicals out of their Canon because of the expertise of this council: Do you really trust these people to inerrantly determine the Canon if they’ve already showed a willingness to re-write Scriptures in order to achieve their purposes?!?!?
 
My focus is not Isaiah 7:14 at all. It was just an example to show that the council of Jamnia “bent the rules” in their interpretation of the Scripture in order to downplay the allusions to the Messiah.

My question to those that took the Deutero-canonicals out of their Canon because of the expertise of this council: Do you really trust these people to inerrantly determine the Canon if they’ve already showed a willingness to re-write Scriptures in order to achieve their purposes?!?!?
Does it seem to you that the Protestants on this forum are being very silent on your original question?
 
Does it seem to you that the Protestants on this forum are being very silent on your original question?
Thats because he doesn’t have a real point to make. His “debate” will only lead to a petty arguement. Christians today use this “canon” to lead Jews to their Messiah. And some broken, yet natural branches do get grafted back into the olive tree, now whose authority is behind that?
I know missionaries that can witness Christ masterfully to Jews from the same scriptures Rabbis use. As a matter of fact, like some Christians, the issue is to just getting them to read their scriptures.
 
Thats because he doesn’t have a real point to make. His “debate” will only lead to a petty arguement. Christians today use this “canon” to lead Jews to their Messiah. And some broken, yet natural branches do get grafted back into the olive tree, now whose authority is behind that?
I know missionaries that can witness Christ masterfully to Jews from the same scriptures Rabbis use. As a matter of fact, like some Christians, the issue is to just getting them to read their scriptures.
Who’s pointing to the Jews?

The OP is meant to make Non-Catholic Christians, who have removed the 7 books from the OT Canon, and use the Council of Jamnia’s Jewish authority to justify this position, to see that the Council of Jamnia obviously used subjective bias (redundant phrase?) in asserting their authority.

Jews who are evangelized to can follow this same logic in their Spiritual Journey, but they are in no way separated out in this thread.
 
I’ve heard of the Council of Jamnia, where the Jews determined the OT Canon, eliminating the 7 deuterocanonicals. Other Christian faiths have used this as the basis for removing these same books from their Christian Canon. Although I’ve heard that Jamnia never even formalized a canon, that’s not the reason for my debate.

I was reading on AgapeBibleStudy.Com about Jamnia and saw an anti-Christian bias in the council’s actions. Let me illustrate:
Now, I ask you, if you follow the oft-repeated claim that the Jews are the authority of OT Scriptures, and you see how these same Jews changed the Scriptures to try to squash this new Christian Sect that was growing, is this the kind of authority you wish to rely on to determine OT Scriptures?!?!?
Your quote is rubbish.
 
Originally Posted by Joel Tunnah
And the greek septuagint, which was translated by jewish scholars 200 years before Christ, uses virgin. So, this wasn’t just ‘made up’ by Christians looking for a prophecy to mess with.
Thanks for that point! I often forget that the Septuagint was commissioned by the Jews so that they could understand the Scriptures more clearly. It seems only the Jews in Judea could read Hebrew (with a few exceptions here and there).
**You are both mistaken. **

**The Septuagint, as it was in its original form, was only a translation of the Torah only **and for a specific reason, and that reason is that the Sages would not allow the Prophets and Writings to be translated at that time. Often you find Christian apologists and missionaries pointing to the Prophets and the Writings in the Septuagint, saying “don’t you see? This is how the rabbis translated it into Greek!”

The Origin of the Septuagint
Talmud - Megillah 9a


The following is a translation of a page of the Talmud, which addresses the origin of the Greek translation of the Scriptures, the Septuagint. This translation comes from the Davka CD-ROM Talmud. Numbers highlighted in blue denote footnotes beneath the Talmud quote.

‘R. Judah said: When our teachers permitted Greek, they permitted it only for a scroll of the Torah’.1 This was on account of the incident related in connection with King Ptolemy,2 as it has been taught: ‘It is related of King Ptolemy that he brought together seventy-two elders and placed them in seventy-two [separate] rooms, without telling them why he had brought them together, and he went in to each one of them and said to him, Translate3 for me the Torah of Moses your master.4 G-d then prompted each one of them and they all conceived the same idea and wrote for him, G-d created in the beginning,5 I shall make man in image and likeness,6 And he finished on the sixth day,and rested on the seventh day,7 Male and female he created him 8 [but they did not write ‘created them’],9 Come let me descend and confound their tongues,10 And Sarah laughed among her relatives;11 For in their anger they slew an ox and in their wrath they digged up a stall;12 And Moses took his wife and his children, and made them ride on a carrier of men;13And the abode of the children of Israel which they stayed in Egypt and in other lands was four hundred years,14 And he sent the elect of the children of Israel;15 And against the elect of the children of Israel he put not forth his and;

(The Talmud goes to the next page to list the rest of the changes from the original Hebrew that were made in the translation.)

**Furthermore, we see corroboration of this from the works of Flavius Josephus, in his preface to Antiquities of the Jews. **

*I found, therefore, that the second of the Ptolemies was a king who was extraordinarily diligent in what concerned learning, and the collection of books; that he was also peculiarly ambitious to procure a translation of our law, and of the constitution of our government therein contained, into the Greek tongue. Now Eleazar the high priest, one not inferior to any other of that dignity among us, did not envy the forenamed king the participation of that advantage, which otherwise he would for certain have denied him, but that he knew the custom of our nation was, to hinder nothing of what we esteemed ourselves from being communicated to others. Accordingly, I thought it became me both to imitate the generosity of our high priest, and to suppose there might even now be many lovers of learning like the king; for he did not obtain all our writings at that time; but those who were sent to Alexandria as interpreters, gave him only the books of the law, while there were a vast number of other matters in our sacred books. They, indeed, contain in them the history of five thousand years; in which time happened many strange accidents, many chances of war, and great actions of the commanders, and mutations of the form of our government. Upon the whole, a man that will peruse this history, may principally learn from it, that all events succeed well, even to an incredible degree, and the reward of felicity is proposed by G-d; but then it is to those that follow his will, and do not venture to break his excellent laws: and that so far as men any way apostatize from the accurate observation of them, what was practical before becomes impracticable and whatsoever they set about as a good thing, is converted into an incurable calamity. *
 
Zahava,

The beginning of the septuagint was the translation of the Torah, as you say, but the work progressed after that to all the other books of the Tanakh - and the translation occured over many years, and stages.

All the books of western canons of the Old Testament are found in the Septuagint. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint)

The book of Isaiah was in what we call “the Septuagint”, and was quoted by Jesus and his disciples who wrote the beginnings of the NT.
 
Originally Posted by Joel Tunnah
And the greek septuagint, which was translated by jewish scholars 200 years before Christ, uses virgin. So, this wasn’t just ‘made up’ by Christians looking for a prophecy to mess with.

**You are both mistaken. **

**The Septuagint, as it was in its original form, was only a translation of the Torah only **and for a specific reason, and that reason is that the Sages would not allow the Prophets and Writings to be translated at that time. Often you find Christian apologists and missionaries pointing to the Prophets and the Writings in the Septuagint, saying “don’t you see? This is how the rabbis translated it into Greek!”
This may be true for the original translation of the Septuagint, but the OT Canon grew just centuries prior to Christ ( I say Canon, but actually it’s just the known inspired books - there was no fixed canon).

The prophets and the Wisdom books were considered inspired by some groups (Pharisees for example) and were incorporated into the OT Canon around the beginning of the 2nd century BC. 100 years later, the Psalms were incorporated in. All these were a part of the Greek Translations that were called the “Septuagint”, although actually the original Torah only was translated by the 70 scribes.

We can see the acceptance of the Greek Translation simply by reading the OT texts of the NT. When Paul quotes the Psalms and when others quote Isaiah and the other prophets, it’s clear they are quoting from the Greek Translation commonly known as the Septuagint.
 
Zahava, I do thank you for the note on the Translations. I had heard that all 70 had come up independently with the exact same translation - something that could simply not happen without
a) divine guidance, or
b) human chicanery. 😉

I heard this story on a CD talk of Fr. Robert Altier’s, but I never knew the source. I appreciate the explanation.
 
Zahava, I do thank you for the note on the Translations. I had heard that all 70 had come up independently with the exact same translation - something that could simply not happen without
a) divine guidance, or
b) human chicanery. 😉

I heard this story on a CD talk of Fr. Robert Altier’s, but I never knew the source. I appreciate the explanation.
NotWorthy and Joel, I must say you two are most charitable with your replies. Thank you.

I found an interesting link from Christian Scholars.

Philo of Alexandria (fl. 1st c CE) confirms that only the Torah was commissioned to be translated, and some modern scholars have concurred, noting a kind of consistency in the translation style of the Greek Penteteuch. Over the course of the three centuries following Ptolemy’s project, however, other books of the Hebrew Scriptures were translated into Greek. It is not altogether clear which book was translated when, and in what locale. It seems that sometimes a Hebrew book was translated more than once, or that a particular Greek translation was revised

The popularity of the legend of the translation helps to explain why, when we first hear Christians explicitly mention the translation in the mid-second century (SS Justin Martyr and Irenaeus), the entire Old Testament in Greek, whether originally written in Hebrew or not, is credited to the Seventy-two. Thus, from the second century onward, Christians embraced a Septuagint that encompassed a larger body of literature than that found in the Hebrew, and they attributed it all to the work of the seventy-two ancient Jewish translators. For their part, Jewish rabbis, particularly Pharisees, reacted to the Christian appropriation of the Septuagint by producing fresh translations of their Scriptures (e.g., Aquila, in 128 CE, or Symmachus in the late 2d c. CE), and discouraging the use of the Septuagint. By the second century Christian and Jewish leaders had cemented their position on the form and character of the Scriptures. By and large, Christians held to the peculiar, prophetic character of their Septuagint, whereas Jews rejected it.

kalvesmaki.com/LXX/
 
Zahava, other than the lavender and lilac high-lighting of your post (I had to select the text with my mouse in order to read it), thanks for the information!

To be honest with you, I wasn’t aware that the Torah comprised the entirety of the OT Scriptures for so long, and that it was so late in the pre-Christian era that the other books were accepted as inspired - especially the Psalms. Of course, this explains why the Sadducee’s were still clinging to the Torah, it had been the accepted Canon for so long. And, of course, the Samarians clung to the Torah. It seems people don’t want to consider writings that chastise them for turning away from Yahweh to be truly inspired. It would speak volumes against them if they did.

God Bless!!!
 
Zahava, other than the lavender and lilac high-lighting of your post (I had to select the text with my mouse in order to read it), thanks for the information!

To be honest with you, I wasn’t aware that the Torah comprised the entirety of the OT Scriptures for so long, and that it was so late in the pre-Christian era that the other books were accepted as inspired - especially the Psalms. Of course, this explains why the Sadducee’s were still clinging to the Torah, it had been the accepted Canon for so long. And, of course, the Samarians clung to the Torah. It seems people don’t want to consider writings that chastise them for turning away from Yahweh to be truly inspired. It would speak volumes against them if they did.

God Bless!!!
The Torah comprises the 1st 5 books.
TaNaCH equals the Torah, the Prophets and the writings
The Sadducee’s rejected the Oral Torah - they were not considered Torah Observant Jews.

I believe Christians need to go back to 101.
G-d is not a man
There is no G-d but one and j*sus certainly is not the Almighty

Be well…
 
There is no G-d but one and j*sus certainly is not the Almighty.
Well, 2.1 billion christians disagree with you and your 14 million fellow jews (14 million and two when my twins are born, god willing 🙂 ).
 
Well, 2.1 billion christians disagree with you and your 14 million fellow jews (14 million and two when my twins are born, god willing 🙂 ).
Yep, small in number indeed… 🙂 🙂

It is thus written, God did not set His love over you, nor choose you, because you were greater in number than any other nation, for indeed, you were the least populous of all nations. But because God loved you, and because He kept the oath that He made to your fathers, God brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you from the house of bondage (Deut.

Israel has a mission to bear witness to God’s existence. God thus told Israel, You are My witness… and My servant whom I have chosen (Isaiah 43:10). It is taught that Israel is like the heart of humanity, constantly beating and infusing all mankind with faith in God and His teachings.

This universal message would often be proclaimed even at the price of suffering and persecution. It is taught that Israel is likened to an olive, since just as an olive must be crushed to bring forth oil, so Israel is persecuted so that its light should shine forth. Even the dispersion of Israel among the nations was to teach the world how to serve God. Moreover, the fact that Israel was scattered all over the world would guarantee that they not become extinct by means of their persecutions.

Because of Israel’s unique place in God’s plan, the people must constantly be corrected whenever they stray from the true path. God thus said, Only you have I known of all the families of the earth, therefore I will keep account of all your sins’ (Amos 3:2). Still, when God punishes Israel, He only does so as a father punishes his children. It is thus written, As a man chastises his son, so God your Lord chastises you (Deut. 8:5).

Nevertheless, God promised that despite all these sufferings, Israel wold always continue to exist to fulfill His purpose. He thus said, The mountains may depart, and the hills may be removed, but My kindness will not depart from you, neither will My covenant of peace be removed (Isaiah 54:10)…

Although Israel has been persecuted and degraded throughout history, the nation will ultimately be vindicated. God said, Although you have been hated and forsaken, so that no man is concerned with you, I will make you an object of eternal pride and never ending joy (Isaiah 60:15). It is God’s promise that Israel will ultimately restore the world to good, and cannot be destroyed as long as the task is not completed. He said, [Israel] shall not fail nor be crushed until he has rectified the world, for the islands await his teachings (Isaiah 42:4).

Most important, Israel has the role of fulfilling God’s purpose in creation. God said to Israel, I have placed My words in your mouth, and have kept you safe under the shelter of My hand, so that I may plant the heavens and lay the foundations of the earth, and say to Zion, ‘You are My people’ (Isaiah 51:16). It is thus taught that God, Israel and the Torah are uniquely linked together. The Torah is like oil in a lamp, and Israel is its wick, causing the light of God to shine forth on all creation.
 
The Torah comprises the 1st 5 books.
TaNaCH equals the Torah, the Prophets and the writings
The Sadducee’s rejected the Oral Torah - they were not considered Torah Observant Jews.

I believe Christians need to go back to 101.
G-d is not a man
There is no G-d but one and j*sus certainly is not the Almighty

Be well…
Zahava,you seem to be very gifted in Knowledge of Scripture.How wonderful,as for myself,I don’t believe I could possibly offer anything to you regarding Old Testament,but maybe I can have you interpret Genisis 1-26…".Let us make." I need some help on this…thank you, Jack
 
The Torah comprises the 1st 5 books.
TaNaCH equals the Torah, the Prophets and the writings
The Sadducee’s rejected the Oral Torah - they were not considered Torah Observant Jews.

I believe Christians need to go back to 101.
G-d is not a man
There is no G-d but one and j*sus certainly is not the Almighty

Be well…
Perhaps another thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top