P
paddy22
Guest
I believe this attitude is the equivalent of the ‘holier-than-thou’ charge often aimed at Catholics who attend the TLM.People should try to worship God rather than worship worship.
I believe this attitude is the equivalent of the ‘holier-than-thou’ charge often aimed at Catholics who attend the TLM.People should try to worship God rather than worship worship.
And humans made the bread as it is recited in the OF Offertory. What’s your point? We’re speaking Christianized Latin here, not some barbaric language. And it can be used in the OF.It did not come from on high, humans made Latin, just like English or any other language.
And, might I add, that this is a language set apart and used only for the worship of God (ecclesiastical Latin, not the Latin used by lawyers or doctors, you know, those dead professionsAnd humans made the bread as it is recited in the OF Offertory. What’s your point? We’re speaking Christianized Latin here, not some barbaric language.
Wow! What’s a barbaric language? Swahili? Arabic? Armenian? Christians speak in all of those languages, and the Mass is said in all of those languages (and was said in Arabic and Armenian, even before the 1960s.) Today is the feast of a group of martyrs who died for Chritianity in Uganda. Is Ugandan or the dialect they spoke on your list of barbaric languages?And humans made the bread as it is recited in the OF Offertory. What’s your point? We’re speaking Christianized Latin here, not some barbaric language. And it can be used in the OF.
One of the toughest lessons of the christian life is to realize the PEOPLE are not our enemies, regardless of how badly they treat us. Charitably speaking, she most likely doesn’t hate you or “us.” She hates something she experienced in the past. She might even mistake you as being the ‘same’ sort of person that created that experience in the past. Maybe it was abuse by a priest back in the TLM days and she conflates the two somehow. Maybe she assumes that the old liturgy created some mean old crusty pastor who refused to fix the the boiler in the convent properly or safely remove the asbestos. Who knows?
The best way to discredit her hostility is to be the light of Christ, turn the other cheek and don’t respond in kind. Who knows, she might even see her mistake and realize that neither you nor other catholics who yearn for clear teaching on sin and Grace and undiluted liturgy are evil after all. If not, it matters less all the time. Her generation is nearly all retired now and because of her attitude and those like her, the next generation is so ignorant of catholic liturgical and devotional traditions that they generally have no innate hostility towards it.
The times are about to get interesting. Don’t get mad, just lift your lamp.
Thanks for asking. I’m thinking like the Anglo-Saxon, Huns, Lombards, Goths, Franks, and all others who tried to wipe out the Christians in the early centuries.Wow! What’s a barbaric language?
The nastiness really started with the thread’s title before it even moved into the body. Ten to twelve years ago there was no licit Mass said in Latin, so the nun, who so far has not been afforded the right to speak in her own defense, was correct. “Gimmicks” and “looks could kill” and “strongly suspected reactions” sound strongly subjective.This thread is barely 2 hours old and already it’s gotten nasty. My my, but that has to be some sort of record.![]()
It should be considered good advice no matter which form of the Latin Rite one prefers.Stylites, you are right on target!![]()
Look at it this way - I think it’s human nature rank the actions of others as having a “higher” or “lower” status than ours. You see the same, us. vs. them mentality when discussing stay-at-home vs. working mothers, organic vs. non-organic gardening, parents who vaccinate vs. parents who don’t, just a whole host of issues. I think the cause for this goes way, way back to our days in the caves, when getting in with the right clique was a matter of life of death for an individual. Affiliate yourself with the wrong group of hunters and you might starve.What bothers me, saddens me, angers me and frustrates me is threads like this that put an “us vs. them” mentality to our Church. If you find the TLM to fit your spirituality better, I have no problem with that, and I hope that you have access to one. However, to say that I 'hate" you because of it is quite the stretch. Just another one of my issues with many of the more “traditionallly minded” people I have met- the mentality that if you are not with them 100%, you are against them and the Church.
So sad…![]()
I totally disagree.The nastiness really started with the thread’s title before it even moved into the body.
That’s not quite accurate, and no, the sister was NOT correct.Ten to twelve years ago there was no licit Mass said in Latin, so the nun, who so far has not been afforded the right to speak in her own defense, was correct.
The OP recounted an incident that she experienced, so of course it’s subjective. I didn’t see anything in the OP’s post to claim otherwise.“Gimmicks” and “looks could kill” and “strongly suspected reactions” sound strongly subjective.
I try not to read nothing entitled with HATE, but curiosity got the best of me.The nastiness really started with the thread’s title before it even moved into the body. Ten to twelve years ago there was no licit Mass said in Latin, so the nun, who so far has not been afforded the right to speak in her own defense, was correct. “Gimmicks” and “looks could kill” and “strongly suspected reactions” sound strongly subjective.
I’m not sure you’re correct here. Since the TLM was never ‘abrogated’ and since there are other places in the world beside the U.S., there most certainly WERE ‘licit Masses said in Latin’ --and yes, I’ll wager in the U.S. too, 10-12 years ago. Weren’t the FSSP active then and before?The nastiness really started with the thread’s title before it even moved into the body. Ten to twelve years ago there was no licit Mass said in Latin, so the nun, who so far has not been afforded the right to speak in her own defense, was correct. “Gimmicks” and “looks could kill” and “strongly suspected reactions” sound strongly subjective.
I agree. It saddens me too. Sometimes people just don’t understand especially converts who did not grow up with the Latin Mass. We need not respond in an uncharitable way to their posts. It is an opportunity for us to enlighten them why we do what we do. I’ve seen some otherwise good posts if it were not for the demeaning remarks that accompany them.Speaking for myself, as someone who, at least on this board is considered “ultra-liberal”(which I find extremely amusing since most in my Diocese consider me too conservative!!)
I do not “hate” traditions, nor does anyone that I know.
Actually, I do not “hate” anything, (except maybe liver, but that’s a different story!)
What bothers me, saddens me, angers me and frustrates me is threads like this that put an “us vs. them” mentality to our Church. If you find the TLM to fit your spirituality better, I have no problem with that, and I hope that you have access to one. However, to say that I 'hate" you because of it is quite the stretch. Just another one of my issues with many of the more “traditionallly minded” people I have met- the mentality that if you are not with them 100%, you are against them and the Church.
So sad…![]()
The TLM may never have been “abrogated” but the average catholic did not know that ten years ago.I’m not sure you’re correct here. Since the TLM was never ‘abrogated’ and since there are other places in the world beside the U.S., there most certainly WERE ‘licit Masses said in Latin’ --and yes, I’ll wager in the U.S. too, 10-12 years ago. Weren’t the FSSP active then and before?
Even if no Catholic in the world ‘knew’ the TLM had not been abrogated, that wouldn’t have made it abrogated.The TLM may never have been “abrogated” but the average catholic did not know that ten years ago.