Thinking Differently, but staying in the Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinc1019
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Where else would I go? I have examined all of the major denominations in America and none of them are perfect…The Catholic Church is closer than many.
How do you know? Do you mean the Catholic Church is in agreement with you more than many?

I don’t know where you’d go. I don’t know how one picks one church that teaches doctrinal error, over another church that teaches doctrinal error? Better parking on Sunday (or should that be Saturday)?
 
I am glad to hear someone sympathizing with my position. I agree with you on the issue of perpetual virginity by the way…

At any rate, I understand the Catholic Church has the right to choose what its members must believe, but I obviously wish their policies on these issues would be different.
Yes, but I think to just “swallow everything whole” without doing the research for yourself can be just as damaging.
I think of the parable of the seed that is tossed into shallow soil.
If you just accept xyz merely because someone says you have to, then how much of a believer are you?

I think it’s great you’re looking into, and doing your own research - we’re called to be constantly working out our salvation. 🙂

Best of luck to you,
~ PetiteFoi
 
wow - wanna judge my salvation while you’re on a roll? :rolleyes:
If he had it his way, the Catholic Church in America would be virtually non-existent in much of the country, especially in the very same areas it has been so successful as of late.
 
I’m with Justin on this one.
I have been all over Christian churches, from evangelical charismatic, to united, to reformed. Never have I fully 100% accepted the churches doctrine.
Also like Justin I have issue with some beliefs of the Catholic church, (perpetual virginity of mary to name one) but I don’t believe that means I cannot be a Catholic, or that I should take myself elsewhere…
What does it even mean to be a Catholic while disagreeing with Catholic teachings and believing them wrong? Is it just a tribal thing?
 
How do you know? Do you mean the Catholic Church is in agreement with you more than many?

I don’t know where you’d go. I don’t know how one picks one church that teaches doctrinal error, over another church that teaches doctrinal error? Better parking on Sunday (or should that be Saturday)?
The Catholic Church is closer to the true teachings of the apostles, based on the evidence I have seen from the Church Fathers and from various other sources.
 
I have several ideas about where you could go, but I will focus instead on the reasons for your choice to stay. Basically you seem to be making this choice based upon your own investigations and standards of perfection. You have made yourself the moral standard by which “all of the major denominations” should be measured.

Here is a document on conscience you might find helpful.

What we are called upon to do, as Catholics, is called “the obedience of faith”. That means that we will obey the Teachings of the Church as they are from Christ Himself. We may not be pursuaded about the doctrines, but we make a conscious and willful decision to obey in spite of our lack of conviction. We say, as Thomas did “Lord, help my unbelief!”.
  1. By faith, man completely submits his intellect and his will to God. With his whole being man gives his assent to God the revealer. Sacred Scripture calls this human response to God, the author of revelation, “the obedience of faith.”
  2. To obey . . . in faith is to submit freely to the word that has been heard, because its truth is guaranteed by God, who is Truth itself . . . Abraham is the model of such obedience offered us by Sacred Scripture. The Virgin Mary is its most perfect embodiment. (Emphasis in original)
Here is an interesting article with a lot of good references to the official documents that might help you understand what “religious submission of will and intellect” means. It sounds from your post like you are suffering from what is defined in the Catechism as heresy.

It appears to emanate from a state of hubris, which is common to humankind.
I appreciate the response. However, you are basing the idea that I should be obedient on a doctrine I don’t believe is accurate…so the whole thing kind of goes out the window. Just so you realize it, many religions require their believers to be obedient…Should you believe in Islam because Muhammad told you to? Why don’t you believe in Islam? If Muhammad is right, you should be a Muslim. You choose not to be a Muslim using reason, logic, history, etc.
 
I appreciate all of the information and for your opinion. No need to apologize for it; it’s why I asked. I believe I have answered your question already, but just to make myself clear…I believe that all churches have at least one important teaching wrong. I believe in the importance of the sacraments, which rules out most churches as it is…and I reject double predestination, among other Calvinist teachings, so there really are not a whole lot of other Christian churches left. By the time you weed out the churches which have gone off the deep end in the last fifty years, theologically speaking, there are even less churches available. Generally speaking, I believe the most important thing in a church is that it is as close to the teachings of the apostles as possible. Given my options, the Catholic Church is one of the closest and possibly the closest church to those teachings, even if some of it is not right, in my opinion of course. Where else do I go? That’s the whole point.
What do you reject about the Orthodox Church?
 
If he had it his way, the Catholic Church in America would be virtually non-existent in much of the country, especially in the very same areas it has been so successful as of late.
😃 Indeed.

I just think that theology takes time. It’s something that needs to be meditated on, reviewed, looked at from different angles before you can fully accept it.
I was born a cradle Catholic - I was baptized, confirmed, you name it, I did it.
But that didn’t make any difference to our lives - my family just called themselves “catholic”.
Now that I’m coming home, I want to really understand all the aspects and diversity of their theology and dogma.
This is not something that can be come to (or accepted) easily - it’s too important for that, and I hold it more important than that.

Which means that maybe coming to accept perpetual virginity and papal infallibility will take time, research and probably a little God-influence; but I would be surprised if I was told that could not be part of the church because I’m still working those tenants out… but maybe that is, how it is? 🤷
Like I said, I’m learning still.

~ PetiteFoi
 
😃 Indeed.

I just think that theology takes time. It’s something that needs to be meditated on, reviewed, looked at from different angles before you can fully accept it.
I was born a cradle Catholic - I was baptized, confirmed, you name it, I did it.
But that didn’t make any difference to our lives - my family just called themselves “catholic”.
Now that I’m coming home, I want to really understand all the aspects and diversity of their theology and dogma.
This is not something that can be come to (or accepted) easily - it’s too important for that, and I hold it more important than that.

Which means that maybe coming to accept perpetual virginity and papal infallibility will take time, research and probably a little God-influence; but I would be surprised if I was told that could not be part of the church because I’m still working those tenants out… but maybe that is, how it is? 🤷
Like I said, I’m learning still.

~ PetiteFoi
As we all are…despite the many voices throughout Catholic Answers that seem to suggest they have it all figured out.
 
The Catholic Church is closer to the true teachings of the apostles, based on the evidence I have seen from the Church Fathers and from various other sources.
Assuming you understand the true teachings of the apostles better than the Catholic Church does. That’s a bold assumption.

I guess the question comes down to this: did Jesus intend to found one church on earth, or many churches? If one, which one? If the Catholic Church, then how can you think you know Jesus’ teachings better than her?

If you think Jesus intended to found many churches, then you should not stay in a church which claims that he intended to found only one church.

I’m not saying you should leave, I’m saying that I don’t think you’ve considered all the implications of your trajectory.
 
Assuming you understand the true teachings of the apostles better than the Catholic Church does. That’s a bold assumption.

I guess the question comes down to this: did Jesus intend to found one church on earth, or many churches? If one, which one? If the Catholic Church, then how can you think you know Jesus’ teachings better than her?

If you think Jesus intended to found many churches, then you should not stay in a church which claims that he intended to found only one church.

I’m not saying you should leave, I’m saying that I don’t think you’ve considered all the implications of your trajectory.
I understand your point. I can appreciate it.

However, I do understand.
I do believe Jesus intended for there to be one unified church, but that has not happened…in large part because of the Catholic Church’s own actions by the way.

One of the major reasons I want to be in the Catholic Church is because of the unity. I do believe Christians should be as unified as possible and only the Catholic Church can really offer that. That does not automatically mean the Catholic Church has everything right. Try reading their position on charging interest as a sin in the 18th century and then today in modern times and try to make sense of the difference. There are a million examples of small things the Catholic Church is likely wrong about…but all of them go back to Church infallibility.
 
Code:
I appreciate the inquiry Jonathan. To answer your question, it's probably closer to a moral certainty. In either case, it is a firm belief I have for specific historical and theological reasons, not simply a feeling.
You make a good point about the Church getting everything else right. Truthfully, I don’t believe they have had everything else right. Most of the major things, yes…but some of the minor ones…No. For instance, I think the evidence is very strong that bishops and priests are one order, not two. Even St. Jerome, a Catholic saint, agrees with this point in his Epistle 146. Is this a make or break issue though?
All bishops are priests first…

All individuals are capable of error. That is why saintly people like St. Jerome submit to what God has revealed through the Church, even if it does not agree with their own opinions.
No. But infallibility is, at least for the Church. I am willing to stay despite the belief, but the Church isn’t willing (I don’t think, which is why I posted this question) to allow me to participate as a full member because of it.
This Church is not at liberty pick and choose, cafeteria style. There is One Faith that was handed down from the Apostles, and the Church is obligated to preserve all of what was passed down, as one seamless garment.

You seem to want to retain the sense that you “belong” after unravelling and removing some threads of the One Faith. That is not a matter of what the Church is “willing” to do, but what you are “unwilling” to do.
I’m with Justin on this one.
I have been all over Christian churches, from evangelical charismatic, to united, to reformed. Never have I fully 100% accepted the churches doctrine.
Also like Justin I have issue with some beliefs of the Catholic church, (perpetual virginity of mary to name one) but I don’t believe that means I cannot be a Catholic, or that I should take myself elsewhere…

~ PetiteFoi
I think that most Catholics have struggles or doubts with one or more of the doctrines of the faith. The critical issue is attitude. If we are willing to accept and obey the faith in spite of our misgivings and doubts, then we can retain our Catholicity. As Jinc has echoed, similar to the words of Peter “to whom shall we go?” Maybe Peter wanted to flee also, but he knew there was no where else better to find “the words of eternal life”. So long as we can say with Thomas “Lord, help my unbelief!” then we are spiritually humble enough to allow the Holy Spirit to work in us to bring us in to the fullness of faith.
 
Thanks for the information. However, I am still left with a lot of questions you may be able to clarify. You say assent to Church teaching is required, but I am not “assenting” to it. I don’t believe it. Doesn’t that mean I cannot receive most of the sacraments?

I have heard many of the Church’s arguments in favor of it, including from some of the best modern apologists, and I just do not believe the evidence lines up with their conclusions.
Assent is to say you believe, even if you don’t feel like you do. Different levels of teaching require different levels of assent but that’s a much more complicated topic than what you are asking in this thread. It’s ok to say that you assent to the teaching in your heart, out of love and obedience to the Church, even if you haven’t caught up to that assent with your head. You have to be willing to admit, however, that the study and research of almost 2000 years worth of Catholic theologians might carry more weight than your own conclusions.

If you choose not to assent, then you should not receive any Sacraments without sacramental confession first.
 
I think that most Catholics have struggles or doubts with one or more of the doctrines of the faith. The critical issue is attitude. If we are willing to accept and obey the faith in spite of our misgivings and doubts, then we can retain our Catholicity. As Jinc has echoed, similar to the words of Peter “to whom shall we go?” Maybe Peter wanted to flee also, but he knew there was no where else better to find “the words of eternal life”. So long as we can say with Thomas “Lord, help my unbelief!” then we are spiritually humble enough to allow the Holy Spirit to work in us to bring us in to the fullness of faith.
Exactly!
I’d be the LAST to say I have the corner on truth. That I know how it’s supposed to be - and I’ll happily admit I’m wrong when the time comes.
But in the meantime, I don’t thinks it’s wrong to have doubts or even misgivings - it’s what drives us to do the research, read the writings and pray for faith and understanding!
Mary could have totally be a virgin the whole time and had a celibate marriage to Joseph and never had any more children.
But right now, I’m still working that out - and as long as I’m willing to allow myself to be convinced otherwise, not harden my heart or be completely set in my opinions that do not follow the tenants of the church, I cannot see why I could not be a Catholic.

Thanks for your post - I have to say the first response to my post was more than a little, uh.harsh.
So this is very refreshing. 👍
~ PetiteFoi
 
I am glad to hear someone sympathizing with my position. I agree with you on the issue of perpetual virginity by the way…
Don’t you think the Apostles would know if Mary had other children? Why would they teach their disciples that she was “ever virgin”?
At any rate, I understand the Catholic Church has the right to choose what its members must believe, but I obviously wish their policies on these issues would be different.
Actually, she does not. The Church has the responsibility to preserve the once for all divine deposit of faith. She must preserve the completed public revelation that closed with the death of the last Apostle. It is not a matter of “policies on issues”. The Apostles commanded that what was handed down was to be preserved without alteration.
Papal infallibility is a fundamental teaching of the Church. It is dogma. You must choose to believe what the Church proposes for your belief - that is the theological virtue of faith.

CCC 1814 Faith is the theological virtue by which we believe in God and believe all that he has said and revealed to us, and that Holy Church proposes for our belief, because he is truth itself.

Papal infallibility is dogma. You must change your belief to conform to Church teaching in spite of your reasearch. You must decide to believe.

-Tim-
I don’t think that someone can obtain a theological virtue like faith by “deciding”. That being said, I do think one can obey in spite of lacking in conviction on a dogma. One must decide to obey, and rather than hold obstinantly to a contrary position on doctrine or dogma, take a positoin of humility that seeks to be conformed to Christ (present in His Church).
 
The Orthodox Church also teaches infallibility, just in a different way.
So, do you think that there can be no such thing as infallibility? So, you think that no Christian today can know Christ’s truth, that no one can know what Christ really teaches?

I’m just trying to understand your view.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top