This Wednesday, 8/6/2008, I will be leaving communion with the Roman Catholic Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christy74
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
St. Ignatius was the successor of Peter, bishop of Antioch.
I do not have any problem with this.
St. Ignatius talks a LOT about Church organization, the hierarchal natue of the Church, the epsicopacy, unity, etc. The Vatican claims it is the center fo all these things. St Ignatiius don’t Rome in connection with these at all.
Don’t forget that St. Ignatius was talking about bishops, priests, etc. Since the Popes were bishops, then they were included by the saint.
I didn’t say he said anyting on the papacy.
Good. At least we agreed that the saint was not talking about the papacy.
And the Popes are the bishops of Alexandria.
I didn’t know that the bishops of Alexandria were able obtain exclusive rights to use that title.
 
No.

The pious emperor Gratian thought it unfitting for a Christian emperor.

So he gave it to Pope Damasus. It is the oldest office in Europe.

Btw, no I don’t see this as evidence of the pagan origin of the Vatican. That’s just nonsense. It is, however a use of an office that was not in the Church as a source of authority.
Wow don’t you guys have to get up in the morning? 😉

Not the use of an office…the use of a title.

Anyway your take is a little different than what I read.
 
I don’t hate anything, much less other Christian churches.

Disagreement is not hatred or even dislike for that matter?
Sorry, let me rephrase. Once again you disagree with something that you “think the Church proposes.” Which you do often in these threads. In this instance it was “works”.
 
Very interesting Christy - I wish you well on your journey. Ironically, I’m in process of coming into full communion with the Roman Catholic Church after leaving the Orthodox!!!

My decision was based on a number of factors -
  1. In my experience, the Orthodox Church, although claiming to be Catholic (Universal) is still very divided culturally. In fact, many of the cultural traditions have become mixed in with the spiritual Traditions (with a capital “T”) of the faith.
  2. The Divine Liturgy is generally ONLY served on Sundays or on Holy Days - and many Orthodox still feel that it is presumptuous to take Communion on a weekly basis!!
(I love that the Roman Catholics “CELEBRATE” Mass daily!!!)
  1. From a practical sense - The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is very beautiful - but when observed correctly lasts over 90 Minutes! It is physically draining, and it virtually offers a lot of frustration for parents of young children!!!
  2. It also seems that many Orthodox have lost their joy. Although the Divine Liturgy is technically “Celebrated” - there is an overwhelming sense of “inappropriate unworthiness.” The Pascha (Easter Services) are beautiful - but the celebration of the Risen Christ, which was originally celebrated as a time of feasting after 40 days of Lent - quickly returns to a sense of mourning and fasting.
I’ve found many of the doctrinal differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism to be mostly matters of interpretation.

So, having said that, I find that being Orthodox or Catholic is mostly a matter of preference rather than salvation. Both are guided by the Holy Spirit.

Anyway, many years to you - and may God bless you.
 
I do not have any problem with this.

Don’t forget that St. Ignatius was talking about bishops, priests, etc. Since the Popes were bishops, then they were included by the saint.
And the bishop of Rome, sacramentally speaking, is JUST that: A bishop. Not THE bishop.

Good. At least we agreed that the saint was not talking about the papacy.
I didn’t know that the bishops of Alexandria were able obtain exclusive rights to use that title.
The Popes of Alexandria were GIVEN the title exclusively. The Popes of Rome TOOK the title exclusively. Btw, it has no ontological difference betweenn the holder and any other bishop.
 
Very interesting Christy - I wish you well on your journey. Ironically, I’m in process of coming into full communion with the Roman Catholic Church after leaving the Orthodox!!!

My decision was based on a number of factors -
  1. In my experience, the Orthodox Church, although claiming to be Catholic (Universal) is still very divided culturally. In fact, many of the cultural traditions have become mixed in with the spiritual Traditions (with a capital “T”) of the faith.
  2. The Divine Liturgy is generally ONLY served on Sundays or on Holy Days - and many Orthodox still feel that it is presumptuous to take Communion on a weekly basis!!
(I love that the Roman Catholics “CELEBRATE” Mass daily!!!)
  1. From a practical sense - The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is very beautiful - but when observed correctly lasts over 90 Minutes! It is physically draining, and it virtually offers a lot of frustration for parents of young children!!!
  2. It also seems that many Orthodox have lost their joy. Although the Divine Liturgy is technically “Celebrated” - there is an overwhelming sense of “inappropriate unworthiness.” The Pascha (Easter Services) are beautiful - but the celebration of the Risen Christ, which was originally celebrated as a time of feasting after 40 days of Lent - quickly returns to a sense of mourning and fasting.
I’ve found many of the doctrinal differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism to be mostly matters of interpretation.

So, having said that, I find that being Orthodox or Catholic is mostly a matter of preference rather than salvation. Both are guided by the Holy Spirit.

Anyway, many years to you - and may God bless you.
There’s no fasting during Paschaltide.🤷
 
Sorry, let me rephrase. Once again you disagree with something that you “think the Church proposes.” Which you do often in these threads. In this instance it was “works”.
It’s not that I disagree with doing good things, or attending worship services, or praying. These are obviously important for all Christians to do. I understand also that the RCC does not preach justification by works (as far as I know anyway); and that you acknowledge faith precedes good works.

My disagreements with the RCC in regard to this issue are the same as I have with Arminian (Wesleyan) protestants, which have to do with soteriology. However, I also don’t run around thinking disagreements over soteriology are heretical or any such nonsense (in fact there’s some level of disagreement within the RCC over soteriology – for example between Molinists and Thomists).

Peace
 
Very interesting Christy - I wish you well on your journey. Ironically, I’m in process of coming into full communion with the Roman Catholic Church after leaving the Orthodox!!!

My decision was based on a number of factors -
  1. In my experience, the Orthodox Church, although claiming to be Catholic (Universal) is still very divided culturally. In fact, many of the cultural traditions have become mixed in with the spiritual Traditions (with a capital “T”) of the faith.
  2. The Divine Liturgy is generally ONLY served on Sundays or on Holy Days - and many Orthodox still feel that it is presumptuous to take Communion on a weekly basis!!
(I love that the Roman Catholics “CELEBRATE” Mass daily!!!)
  1. From a practical sense - The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is very beautiful - but when observed correctly lasts over 90 Minutes! It is physically draining, and it virtually offers a lot of frustration for parents of young children!!!
  2. It also seems that many Orthodox have lost their joy. Although the Divine Liturgy is technically “Celebrated” - there is an overwhelming sense of “inappropriate unworthiness.” The Pascha (Easter Services) are beautiful - but the celebration of the Risen Christ, which was originally celebrated as a time of feasting after 40 days of Lent - quickly returns to a sense of mourning and fasting.
I’ve found many of the doctrinal differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism to be mostly matters of interpretation.
Good point. I think that could be said of most disagreements among all Christian faiths. :rolleyes:
Christy is long gone by the way. The thread goes on.
 
If one wishes to paint something black when in fact it is dark brown, he might bit slightly biased, no?😉
 
Quite soon. 40 years. A lifetime.

why not the legitimacy of having three popes?
In a couse of 2000 years almost, 40 years is little, and I thought a lifetime meant around 60 in those days!! Anyhow, that schism was solved…
 
St. Ignatius gives us a complete Ecclesiology, something Protestants squirm about. But nothing about a supreme pontiff, and yet nothing is lacking.
What makes you say he meant to give a “complete” ecclesiology? There was a pope then, and already then he was the bishop of Rome, like it or not. And… wasn’t it still at the times of the Roman Empire?
 
I’ve found many of the doctrinal differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism to be mostly matters of interpretation.

So, having said that, I find that being Orthodox or Catholic is mostly a matter of preference rather than salvation. Both are guided by the Holy Spirit.

Anyway, many years to you - and may God bless you.
Thank you, Martin, for saying this… despite the wounds on both sides since the schism, we still are guided by the Holy Spirit on both sides… although human nature does interfere often and in many ways on both sides!
 
No. I was officially Protestant. When I left it, to suit the Church of the Fathers, one of the things I abjured was filioque, to accept the dogmas of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, as confessed in the original Creed.
In which language does your community celebrate the Divine Liturgy?
When we hear of the Orthodox Church, we usually hear of the Greek Orthodox and the Russian Orthodox… I know there are also Rumanian Orthodox, also Ukrainian Orthodox, Syrian Orthodox… which Orthodox Church do you attend, Isa Almisry?
Or maybe the Coptic? (The last part of your name looks like the Hebrew word for Egypt, and the whole of it is in Arabic…)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top