@meltzerboy2
Here’s my take.
I think that many people today in the western world are being “sold” that there are only two options. Either outright embracement of Onlyfans/porn types things as a false belief of sexual empowerment, or the belief that the only other possible mindset could be prudism and belief of the body as shameful.
But there’s a third option.
Porn doesn’t equal sex, and non-acceptance of porn doesn’t equal being a prude.
I really feel that a lot of people are being brainwashed to not see this. In Australia but possibly even more so in USA. People are also being “brainwashed” now to think that the only things that are porn are…well the literal.
Many people are not not even seeing things like Onlyfans as porn/sex industry when they actually are. It’s become normalized and people are becoming de-sensitized.
I don’t see porn (whether the form of literal or onlyfans type photos etc), as being sexual empowerment of women.
I don’t see anything empowering about selling ones body.
And I don’t see it as empowerment to commodify your body (in whichever form) especially to married men. And of course vice versa half men’s blame as well as a “customer”.
I can’t see the destruction of marriages, and the negative effects on children as empowering.
I don’t see it as empowerment to cheapen women to just an object for sex, even if you are your own “exploiter”, and even if you make a business of millions off your body. I don’t see “you” as a “smart business woman” like people are today being brainwashed that we should view it.
Also, consider this. If it is not “evil”, then why does it earn such big dollars? Usually, the things that are “evil” for society are the things that make the most money. E.g., the commodifying of women’s bodies, drug syndicates, (excessive) gambling, fraud, extortion etc… The “industries” earn those involved in them huge money precisely because they are “evils” for society.
If commodifying your body was just empowerment and healthy for women, you would expect the 'wage earnt" to be pretty basic and average, just like “honest work” at a cafe or whatever.
But the earnings are large, precisely because it is destructive for society and relatively few (although now growing) number of women are willing to do it.
I probably differ with some other Catholics in that I don’t see sex appeal and sensuality itself as a negative thing. Mae West that you mentioned, and some stars of the 50/60’s, had sex appeal. It comes from within.
Womens bodies are not evil. Women’s sexuality is not evil. But it’s the commodification that is “evil”. And sexuality does not have to be expressed in some vulgar, crass, or unhealthy way for it to be empowering. It’s like just sex-appeal is “not enough” these days. It has to cross the line into vulgarity…