Thoughts on drums in mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dolphin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
@Dolphin
Have you studied liturgical music? Do you have knowledge of music history, Catholic music history? Gregorian chant?
Do you know what the difference is between true liturgical music vs. sacred pop or devotional music?
 
Last edited:
40.png
TC3033:
So then…theoretically, the Mass should be acapella?
Yes.

10 characters
Interesting…Then why do so many parishes have at least a piano if not a full out organ?
 
Hi @Dolphin,
I wonder if you would take the time to read something like these? Then you might understand why some people don’t think pop-style music is fitting during Mass. Otherwise this will just become a thread like many others, where there are two camps who just dig in more.



http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-p...ments/hf_jp-ii_let_20031203_musica-sacra.html
 
Last edited:
That is a good question.

Perhaps because many parishes require the instruments to support their singing.
 
That is a good question.

Perhaps because many parishes require the instruments to support their singing.
I don’t know if that really answers my question if, in theory, it’s supposed to be acapella.

I grew up attending a purely acapella non-denominational church, when they made the decision to go to accompaniment music, it was weird for a while.
 
I’m also glad the sign of peace has been omitted. I hope that becomes the norm.
 
Personally, I don’t like drums and guitars and that stuff in church. It’s not my taste. However, I don’t make the rules. If someone wants to go to a mass with that music and the bishop/priest allows it, that’s fine.
 
My impression is that a capella is the ideal rather than a requirement.
 
If you always (mainly) have piano / pop style songs (hymns), then the proper music of the Church is displaced. The people are cheated of their liturgical heritage.
This is not just at the whim of each individual music director. The Church does have a lot of instructions abut music. Those instructions are usually just ignored!
In other words, when we mainly hear “Gather Us In” and that sort of thing, then we’re NOT hearing our own cultural treasure.

What is the opportunity cost of having most Catholic liturgies dominated by David Haas, et al?
OP, @Dolphin - - did you do your homework? Have you been studying up on what liturgical music
actually is? If you’re interested enough to start a thread, maybe you’re interested enough to read up on the topic.

As Saint Pope John Paul II said:

The Second Vatican Council followed up this approach in chapter VI of the Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium on the Sacred Liturgy, in which the ecclesial role of sacred music is clearly defined: “The musical tradition of the universal Church is a treasure of inestimable value, greater even than that of any other art. The main reason for this pre-eminence is that, as sacred melody united to words, it forms a necessary or integral part of the solemn Liturgy”[5]. The Council also recalls that “Sacred Scripture, indeed, has bestowed praise upon sacred song. So have the Fathers of the Church and the Roman Pontiffs who in more recent times, led by St Pius X, have explained more precisely the ministerial function exercised by sacred music in the service of the Lord”[6].
 
Last edited:
I think you could make a good argument for a balance of both. But I’ve never heard anything near a balance.
 
Again, I do prefer an organ and cantor or Schola Cantorum, but the use of drums and/or guitars was approved by, out of anyone, Archbishop Sample, for use in US dioceses. And if Archbishop Sample, who is adamantly traditional, can approve OCP publications, then I’m fairly certain that when used to supplement a well organized liturgy, these pieces do well at glorifying the lord.
Really? I’m pretty sure Archbishop Sample has forbidden the electric guitar in his own archdiocese of Portland. The acoustic guitar may very well be allowed. Drums? I’m skeptical…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top