S
Sir_Knight
Guest
It’s a start. How and why can come later. The important thing is that people turn from their evil ways.Coercion through fear is no substitute for submission through love.
They began BEFORE the effects of an Atomic War was known.I would be curious to know when all of these Three Days prophecies became popular. I understand the ancient images of the sun turning black, etc–but it seems to me that these Three Days with all of their specific requirements and inversions of charity (don’t open the door when someone begs for mercy!) have a lot to do with some very 20th century fears.
It may not be the image given to us by Jesus but it IS the image given to us in the Old Testament …Additionally, the image of Our Lady or Blessed Faustina holding back God’s wrath is very affecting, but what does it say about God? That he’s a wrathful impetuous sort of guy–not slow to anger and abounding in lovingkindness–a wrathful old man. This is not the image of God we are given in Jesus Christ.
Exodus 32:10-14 … “Now then let Me alone, that My anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them; and I will make of you a great nation.” Then Moses entreated the LORD his God, and said, “O LORD, why does Your anger burn against Your people whom You have brought out from the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand? Why should the Egyptians speak, saying, ‘With evil {intent} He brought them out to kill them in the mountains and to destroy them from the face of the earth’? Turn from Your burning anger and change Your mind about {doing} harm to Your people. Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, Your servants to whom You swore by Yourself, and said to them, ‘I will multiply your descendants as the stars of the heavens, and all this land of which I have spoken I will give to your descendants, and they shall inherit {it} forever.’” So the LORD changed His mind about the harm which He said He would do to His people.
… Didn’t Moses hold back the wrath of God? And what does it say about God? “That he’s a wrathful impetuous sort of guy–not slow to anger and abounding in lovingkindness–a wrathful old man.”
And doesn’t Malachi 3:6 tell us that God does not change from generation to generation?
Why? Doesn’t the Old Testament tell us that demons had relationships with women and produced a giant race that was ultimately destroyed in the flood.Furthermore, the idea of demons literally walking the earth as if they had assumed flesh like we have flesh seems to be a theological impossibility–
I don’t follow what you are saying. The angels are spiritual beings and are free of sin. We are in the flesh and according to scripture, even the most pious of us sins against God at least seven times.matter is good. We are blessed to be in our bodies.
Who allowed them to incarnate in Genesis 6:2-4?Who is allowing the demons to incarnate? What permission is given them?
What does it say about God’s when He allows demons to tempt us so that can end up being damned to hell. Or, about allowing demons to possess us requiring an exorcisim?If God grants this permission, what does this reveal, then, about God’s attitude toward the good earth, the material substance of our bodies, that he has made–that he would be willing to hand it over to demons to defile?
I think that I already offered a few examples from scripture for a precendent.What precendent is there in either scripture or tradition for such a thing?
Not as much as you might think.The whole thing, literally interpreted, stands Christianity on its head.