- self-proclaimed patriot
- a NUT
- cosplayed Rizal and accused our Church of playing Padre Damaso
Whoa, whoa, WHOA! I did not accuse anyone of this. Re-read my statement please, you are seriously putting words in my mouth.
Before I am accused of:
- Being an apologists for the colonial Spanish crown instead of the Church
Let me clarify where I was coming from.
I am in no way denying the atrocities committed by Spain during colonial times in the Philippines. See post #361. Maybe I was not clear that I would rather dwell on the GOOD things that Spain brought in the country than settle on the idea of blaming Spain for all the chaos the Filipinos are in for right now.
If you truly were focused on the good, then where do you get off for accusing our national heroes of being anti-Catholic? That’s exactly the sort of thing an apologist of the Spanish crown does. Sorry, but it sounds like you need to follow your own advice. Your links and responses are still trying to minimize/trivialize the atrocities committed.
Forgive and forget the past as the song goes. Filipinos should learn to forgive Spain (America and Japan as well) for the countless offenses committed, not for the colonizers sake, but for the sake of the Philippines.
Forgive does not necessarily imply forget or else penance would be meaningless.
You may include Constantine TG as a self-proclaimed patriot, a NUT himself for cosplaying Rizal and accusing the Church as Padre Damaso in one of his
post.
What post? :ehh:
Still, the issue exist you cannot deny that. Just look at this certain
Filipino Christian, obviously he knew the work of rizal and is using the propaganda against the Catholic church and its clergy. He calls for a better Philippines minus the Catholic church.
Actually, you’re linking to me the sort of patriotic nut I would expect to pull the Rizal cosplay stunt. Again, read my words before firing off accusations yourself.
At least I try to aim mine well.
Maybe Ambeth Ocampo is a revisionist maybe a cosplayer too when he wrote this article
Why the Spaniards are Villains in Philippine History. I could say that I share with him a Philippine History that has a more positive light with regards to the Catholic friars of colonial years.
The article actually proves my point for the most part. Take that small exchange between Aguinaldo and Fray Espejo. One can easily say that Aguinaldo was
singling out Espejo for being a good friar, in contrast to the abusive ones which he
clearly accuses of provoking the rebellions.
In fact, the best thing you could glean from the article in support of your stance is this dubious passage:
Then as now there were friars who broke rules of poverty and obedience. There have been lapses in chastity. All the abuses attributed to the friars in the late 19th century were probably true, but in isolated cases. Yet, there is a tendency to generalize. If the Spanish friars were so bad, why was there a need for them to be written about in the propaganda movement? Wouldn’t their deeds be well known if they were as vile as we are led to believe? If Spanish friars were as bad as they are supposed to be, how could they walk freely in the Philippines, sometimes in places where the friar was the only Spaniard in town? Even the Spanish colonial government that did not always see eye to eye with the Church, treated the friars as a necessary evil. For example, one official was quoted as saying, “It is more important for the preservation of the colony to send 200 religious than 2,000 bayonets.”
This is, at best, pure speculation. And even then, I must point out the absurdity of the bolded portion. Why was there a need? Is this even a question? This was a need because they were so
bad, duh! For the sake of justice, word of these abuses just had to get out!
Wouldn’t their deeds be so well known? I’ve reread this at least three times and still I’m wondering if this man wrote a typo. Of course their notorious depravity was well known!
And please, with the protection of the Spanish crown, you cannot say that friars weren’t safe in the Philippines. Heck, the 200 religious vs 2000 bayonets only proves that the religious had more sway over the people than the guardia civil.