Well, according to many in this thread the SBC is being “deceptive” in their mission work. Still haven’t gotten an explaination as to what they mean by that.
You haven’t gotten an explaination because many, myself included, have lives outside of cyberspace. Patience is a virtue.
First let me preface by saying I am not calling YOU personally, deceptive. If you are, that is between you and God, I cannot make that charge, which is against fourm rules anyway. I am working on the assumption that you are being as honest as possible.
I was evangelical for 20 years and spent some of that time as a Baptist preacher. When the Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT) document was made public, many conservatives went ballistic because it was looked at as comprimise. Many Baptist leaders in each of the Baptist denominations rejected the ECT documents in their entirity. To even suggest Catholics were Christians like Baptists are Christians, was simply out of the question.
Liberally minded evangelicals on the other hand felt a ‘middle way’ in converting Catholics was preferable to the wide-fundamentalist, ‘whore of Babylon’ approach. “Stay away from issues such as Mary, the Eucharist, and the Pope. Concentrate on salvation thru Christ alone”. We were told, and God forgive me, I myself told, many “soul-winners” to concentrate on how “works don’t get you to Heaven (which Catholics do not believe)”. Get them to see their lost condition and then tell them all they need do is “ask Jesus into their heart”. Then focus on the
assurance of salvation. Because Catholics beleive salvation can be lost.
But don’t put down their Church. Don’t attack Catholicism, get them ‘saved’ first and “the Holy Spirit will lead them out of the Catholic Church” (or brother Billy Bob will with personal interpretation of the Bible). Use ‘stealth’ to save Catholics. “Be all things to all people in order to save some”.
In the old days we called that deception, not ‘spin’.
I was there, I saw it. Unless you are willing to say I am being deceptive, you also will have to assume I am being as honest with you as possible.
I said I have more respect for the wide-eyed fundamentalist than the deceptive evangelical using ‘stealth’ to ‘save’ Catholics. I stand by the statement,
Getting back to the OP, I would be willing to put money down that Tom Tebow would, if he dared to come to this forum and explain himself, would use the same tactics as the ECT evangelicals.
Especially now that his son is a public figure and is thinking about politics.