Time for Parents to Resist Transgender Activism

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
edwest2 said:
Thank you for sharing your first-hand observations.

Ed
Click to expand...
No problem. I’m privileged to work with elementary students a lot. I might be the only masculine role model some of the kids have in their day. They won’t get gender confusion nonsense from me.
 
edwest2 said:
That’s right.

abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=1230620

amazon.com/Beyond-Diversity-Day-Curriculum-Sexualities/dp/074252034X

youthtranscriticalprofessionals.org/2016/08/20/gender-activism-in-schools/Ed
Click to expand...
Wow, Ed. First, how monstrously selfish the parents of the so-called “transgender” kindergartner were. Ironic that even after the school administration completely abandoned rationality and any sense of the obvious shame and scandal of sexualizing children, they still got sued by the lunatic parents. Serves them right. Truly diabolical, and that poor delusional kid is just a pawn.
In sum, Luke 17: 2., Matthew 18: 6. :signofcross:
 
Faithdancer said:
No problem. I’m privileged to work with elementary students a lot. I might be the only masculine role model some of the kids have in their day. They won’t get gender confusion nonsense from me.
Click to expand...
There’s really not much scientific evidence that gender identity and sexual orientation are influenced by whether someone has or doesn’t have masculine role models.
 
Thorolfr said:
There’s really not much scientific evidence that gender identity and sexual orientation are influenced by whether someone has or doesn’t have masculine role models.
Click to expand...
There’s plenty of evidence that wicked adults are trying to sexualize children, cause children to question their gender, and convince everyone else that this is “progress.”
 
Faithdancer said:
There’s plenty of evidence that wicked adults are trying to sexualize children, cause children to question their gender, and convince everyone else that this is “progress.”
Click to expand...
Exactly right. And in the end, it leads to sexual perversion. Unless parents act.

Ed
 
Try being a public school teacher and essentially required to call a student by their “new” name.
 
mVitus said:
We can realize that someone feels like a different gender than their body and accept they have that struggle. But we can’t accept when someone denies their biology and says they’re something that they’re not.
Click to expand...
I can’t accept that whoever “we” is doesn’t have bigger fish to fry than worrying about other people’s sexuality. So we all have our problems with acceptance.

However, I sincerely do have some sympathy for the poster’s situation, given that centuries of Catholic DNA racing around my body seems to compel me to share that situation. Just as the poster and a good number of other Catholics feel the incurable need to point the finger and judge, I have that need too, and am doing it now.

So how does it feel having me sticking my big judgmental nose in to your business? Does it feel like Christianity to you?
 
Ormond said:
I can’t accept that whoever “we” is doesn’t have bigger fish to fry than worrying about other people’s sexuality. So we all have our problems with acceptance.

However, I sincerely do have some sympathy for the poster’s situation, given that centuries of Catholic DNA racing around my body seems to compel me to share that situation. Just as the poster and a good number of other Catholics feel the incurable need to point the finger and judge, I have that need too, and am doing it now.

So how does it feel having me sticking my big judgmental nose in to your business? Does it feel like Christianity to you?
Click to expand...
How does it feel to know children are being sexualized and confused on purpose long before they are mentally and emotionally mature enough to understand the truth? I’m not worrying about anybody’s sexuality. And count me out of this “we” nonsense. I’m wise enough to see deception in action with young people, especially kids, as the targets.

And Catholics are being judged all the time. In this particular case, common sense will be my guide. I refuse to be dictated to by anybody who thinks this is OK. Oh, I’ll keep track but it’s a manufactured contest for the truth. The truth always wins.

Ed
 
Ormond said:
I can’t accept that whoever “we” is doesn’t have bigger fish to fry than worrying about other people’s sexuality. So we all have our problems with acceptance.

However, I sincerely do have some sympathy for the poster’s situation, given that centuries of Catholic DNA racing around my body seems to compel me to share that situation. Just as the poster and a good number of other Catholics feel the incurable need to point the finger and judge, I have that need too, and am doing it now.

So how does it feel having me sticking my big judgmental nose in to your business? Does it feel like Christianity to you?
Click to expand...
You’re expressjng your opinion and I’ve no doubt you feel it’s right. So I appreciate your concern with trying to help us see the light, as it were, but just as equally I feel you’re wrong and I’ve stated some of those eeasons in this thread. I’d also like to note that even while I supported gay marriage and whatnot before reading the church arguments, I was still coming to my current stance on transgenderism so in my case it’s a secular argumemt reinforved with religion ratjer than a religious argument reinforced with secular reasons.
 
Crown_of_Stars said:
I’m not looking for any argument, because the only thing I have to say on this is that I’m sick of it, and I’ve heard it to death for long enough. They may be doing this because they think the more and more we hear of it, day in, day out, morning noon and night, the more “accepting” we will be, until any stigma is gone. It won’t happen. The more I hear about it and have it forced on me, the more sick of it and turned off by it I become. Obsessing to death over something won’t make me so used to it I eventually think nothing of it. It will never work. At least not on me.
Click to expand...
The agenda behind it is clearly diabolical but that’s hardly surprising. It is a favorite tactic of the devil to try to sow doubt and confusion.
 
Yes. This is product marketing - using deception and a mostly compliant media.

Ed
 
Thorolfr said:
There are a lot of people who are not interested in “family formation”. Some people don’t want children and aren’t suited to having them. 🤷
Click to expand...
So what? It is an capability which homosexuality negates.
 
Rau said:
So what? It is an capability which homosexuality negates.
Click to expand...
There are also lots of other capabilities that some other people have that I don’t have. We’re all different and that’s life.
 
Thorolfr said:
Actually you’re mistaken. As Rau pointed out (and I agree with him), “The DSM tends to devote space to conditions that cause distress to the individual, impede a person living as he would reasonably wish, or involve risks for others.” After the gay rights movement, being homosexual didn’t distress gay people or impede them living as they wanted, so it made no sense to leave homosexuality in the DSM as a mental illness. Most gay people stopped wanting to be treated for or “cured” of their homosexuality.
Click to expand...
Just to reinforce this point that psychiatric conditions must cause distress or impairment to be in the DSM, Allen Frances, one of the authors of the DSM-IV, said about claims that Mr. Trump is mentally ill:
“He may be a world-class narcissist, but this doesn’t make him mentally ill, because he does not suffer from the distress and impairment required to diagnose mental disorder,” Frances wrote.
Click to expand...
A personality disorder must lead to “clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning,” the DSM IV says.
Click to expand...
nbcnews.com/health/health-news/donald-trump-isn-t-mentally-ill-he-s-just-unpleasant-n721766

That is why any gay person who does not display “clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning,” is not mentally ill and that is why homosexuality was removed from the DSM since homosexuality does not usually fit the definition of a mental illness.
 
Thorolfr said:
…That is why any gay person who does not display “clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning,” is not mentally ill and that is why homosexuality was removed from the DSM since homosexuality does not usually fit the definition of a mental illness.
Click to expand...
And yet evidently, something is amiss, and worthy of scientific study.
 
Ormond said:
Advocating murder now, are we?
Click to expand...
Of course yes the poster is advocating murder.
How else would you take hyperbolic use of scriptural language? :rolleyes:

I guess if you’re a humanist, you take it in a fundamentalist way.

The poster is addressing the cruel abuse of children.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top