S
SemperFidelis
Guest
Really, is that why these traditions died out in the seventies and eighties, when hardly anyone even paid attention to them, while everyone was concentrating on this new NO innovation? The so called “traditionalists” have come a long way since those days.And like all minorities, the traditions you hold fast to will also more then likely die out over the course of time.
Actually, YOU are apart of the Latin Rite as well. The opposition to the TLM was far greater twenty years ago, but somehow it still survived. The opposition is getting smaller and smaller everyday, and the Pope is doing much to squash it. Look at how the TLM is growing. The FSSP, ICRSS, SSJC, CRNJ etc. are growing at enormous rates, and so are the old indult parishes. More and more Priestly societies are being formed all the time that offer only the 62’ Missal. It’s also interesting to note the SSPX is growing by leaps and bounds, in spite of the fact that most thought that Summorum Pontificum would lead to their downfall. Read all the good news coming from the news, blogs, etc. The TLM has “taken off” in Rome, and is doing likewise everywhere. I think the above quote is only what YOU want to believe. Clearly the Pope believes you are wrong as well.Seventh. Any forced attempt to restore the Latin Rite will be met with great opposition.
Yes, and many will not. The use of the TLM is growing whether you like it or not.Many priests will oppose this.
Good for you, but in the end, it’s not going to get you anywhere.I will oppose it.
You don’t have to. I don’t understand Latin and get along just fine. That’s why there’s a Missal.Why? The vast majority of American Catholics do not understand or comprehend Latin.
Actually I think it does the opposite. Go to a Mass in Latin, and you will find far more people actually paying attention than you do at your average Mass in English.To sit thru an entire Mass and not being able to interpret the Latin will cause the mind to wander.
Really? You’d be interested to know then, that the Catholic Church had far more protestant converts prior to the Mass being in the vernacular, than it gets know. Also, there have been far more conversions from Catholicism to protestantism since the introduction of the NO. Maybe it’s because we have something different. The Catholic Church is the only one, true, Church. We don’t need novelties and innovations to keep up with the protestants, and history has proved that. Also Scripture is read in the vernacular at a TLM, and obviously the homily is in the vernacular as well.People will migrate toward Protestant churches where ENGLISH IS SPOKEN AND WHERE SCRIPTURE IS READ IN ENGLISH AND PRAYERS ARE DONE IN ENGLISH.
Really, that’s not what Vatican II said, maybe you should read it.Latin no longer has a place. It was dead 500 years ago. It’s even more dead now.
The English Mass was also the next logical step in the 1200’s when hardly anyone spoke Latin. For some reason though, Mass in the vernacular took more than 800 years to “take off.” I think there’s a reason for that.The English Mass is just the next logical step in the development of Tradition, just as the Douay Rheims was the next logical step.
And as a Latin Rite Catholic, you should take pride in Latin as well. It you don’t remember it’s where you came from, and it’s YOUR heritage. Once again read Vatican II. Don’t come on here and berate good and faithful Catholics who happen to have an attachment to Latin. It’s childish. You are on the TRADITIONAL CATHOLICISM forum. If you don’t like what’s posted here, then stay away.Or are you still so prideful of your Latin and Tridentine Traditions?