TLM Missal Recommendation

  • Thread starter Thread starter rf9661
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s a total coincidence that it became available as I was about to buy the vinyl version on Amazon.
Very grateful for that opportunity. I wonder how many they printed for the anniversary…
 
I can say that the exterior vinyl on the Angelus Press one is not the best either. I’m waiting for the leather one to arrive in the mail which I assume will be much better than this vinyl binding.
True, the outside over the years will fade slightly with regular use, but it is still the best quality missal. The gold on the pages, the page quality, the binding, all around it is superb in its construction and durability.
 
Last edited:
It’s a total coincidence that it became available as I was about to buy the vinyl version on Amazon.
I recommend avoiding Amazon whenever possible. The money does not go to a good end. Buy either direct from Angelus or from PrayingLatin.com as the poster above recommended.
 
I did also order the leather one from Angelus, I found out about the leather one being available and the 30% discount after I had ordered it from Amazon.
Am using the vinyl one from Amazon in the mean time and will return it upon the arrival of the leather one which was already shipped.
I’m surprised that the things from Angelus Press actually come from Kansas City… I wish they would sell stickers or what not from the seminaries/Society…
 
You may be thinking Baronius Press, the L/E shares the same page together w/Latin smaller than English. Angelus has the Latin on one page, English on the opposing page. Same size print.
 
In the Angelus Press one, in everything but the Holy Mass, Latin is side by side with the English and is in a smaller font.
 
I’m sure you know what @CSWalkins is referring to… and if not, there are countless posts about this that you can search for.
 
No, I do not. That is the reason I asked him. I would prefer his answer. Others may second guess what he means but be wrong.
You can look them up. They are legion. Let’s keep this thread on topic.
 
You can look them up.
Could you please tell me where.
Let’s keep this thread on topic.
I am not trying to derail the thread. An unsupported assertion was made. It is fair to ask about that. I would describe the responses I’ve received to that to be obfuscation and a disregard for the rules of logic. I believe, therefore, I am entitled to draw a certain conclusion from not having my question answered.
 
Could you please tell me where.
Are you not familiar with liturgical abuse, unable to find the answers after googling, or are you baiting? There are so many that it would require many threads to discuss, which is why googling was recommended.
I am entitled to draw a certain conclusion from not having my question answered.
That we want to keep thread on topic and not get flagged for removal yes. But if you have a serious question on what is liturgical abuse and what are the most common or what all of them are, you could always start a thread with exactly that question. But googling and finding more credible sources than just opinions of CA Forum posters would be my recommendation on that one at least as a starting point. Hope that helps. Pax.
 
Thank you so very much for twice answering me. 😃

You are not the CAF member who wrote the comment that I enquired about. I asked rather than jump to any conclusions. That particular member has not seen my post or has elected not to respond to it. As that member made the comment I believe only that member can clarify what they meant.

I do believe that based on the particular forum in which the comment was based and that the term was used to refer to the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite of the Mass which is often employed pejoratively that it was, and remains, a valid question.

For my part I shall not explore this matter further unless the member who wrote the comment chooses to respond to my question.

Please keep safe! 🙏
 
I do believe that based on the particular forum in which the comment was based and that the term was used to refer to the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite of the Mass which is often employed pejoratively that it was, and remains, a valid question.

For my part I shall not explore this matter further unless the member who wrote the comment chooses to respond to my question.
If you have not already researched, then I would strongly suggest doing so. It is very prevalent. If you have already then yes, best us just move on. Pax.
 
On this topic, I’ve only had my Father Lassance missal for a couple months now – one of the pages got a drop of moisture on it today, and the page is already peeling in that spot, as if having a hole, and the word is unreadable. My Angelus press missal, which I have had for about 12 years now, all the pages are still in excellent condition after very much use–at least weekly–and the only signs of wear are on the cover that has a little fading where it is held. I really like the pictures and the layout of the Mass in the Fr Lassance and especially the pre-55 Holy Week, but I just wish they would make it better quality. Hope that is helpful for those considering.
 
As I endeavoured to state with clarity in my prior post I believe that only the person to whom I posed my question is able to answer what they meant. I really do not understand why others believe they know that poster’s mind. :confused:

For the avoidance of doubt I do know to what the term liturgical abuse refers. They do occur in all forms and uses of all the rites on the Catholic Church. They are not confined to the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite.
 
They do occur in all forms and uses of all the rites on the Catholic Church. They are not confined to the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite.
Well, we are getting off topic, but they are “ordinarily” confined to the “ordinary” form. 😉 One could search the globe to try to find them in other rites, and it would be very difficult to find. I am not aware of any diocese at least in the US that does not have arguably at least some form of abuse. We could say so much more, but how about we agree to call it here, and save it for another thread.
 
Last edited:
but they are “ordinarily” confined to the “ordinary” form.
You see, here’s my problem. This is a claim regularly levelled but I never see any evidence.
Well, we are getting off topic
That may be true but would’ve been so very easily resolved if the person to whom I posed my original question had explained what it was they meant. Instead others have claimed to know. There will be no more getting off the topic on my part because I am bowing out of this thread.
 
You see, here’s my problem. This is a claim regularly levelled but I never see any evidence.
Google it. You’ll see the examples. Put simply any deviations from the rubrics are an abuse. Other novel practices were introduced through lies and abuses. It’s all documented. You just have to read up on it. As pope Benedict himself explained, any liturgy done in a banal or irrevent manner is itself a form of serious abuse. But again, we are off topic.

On topic would be to say that these roman missals demonstrate the traditional form of the liturgy as it had been used for over fifteen hundred years to Pope St Gregory the Great, many of the prayers dating back to the Apostles themselves. They contain within them prayers that are described as “a treasure of incomparable worth.”
There will be no more getting off the topic on my part because I am bowing out of this thread.
God bless your further examination and yours and my continued growth in holiness especially during this difficult time we have without the sacraments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top