To All Liberal Catholics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flavius_Aetius
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So the Democrats are just as pro-war as anyone else.
While I agree, I also do not think the Republicans have much better moral track history; what they have done, as opposed to what their platform is. I have learned that politicians are not always honest and words should often be ignored if the actions say differently.
 
At least from my perspective, the left wants to get rid of private help for the poor, and the right wants to get rid of government help for the poor.
Who on the left wants to get rid of private help for the poor?

I wouldn’t characterize the “right” as a whole as saying that they want to get rid of government help for the poor entirely, but it’s certainly a position that does have its advocates, in contrast to the former position, which seems to be a pure straw man.

The argument would rather be that the left wants such high levels of taxation on the rich that the rich aren’t going to have much left over for private benevolence (I’m not sure I accept that argument), and that the left wants the government to provide comprehensive coverage so that there won’t be any need for private benevolence. Perhaps that’s what you meant.

Edwin
 
Glen, but you see, the system now has distorted how we are to help one another. Did Jesus tell the Roman government to take care of widows and orphans?
This is a very poor argument, it seems to me. I am baffled by its popularity–perhaps it’s just that the “right” has no better ones:p.

The Roman government was an idolatrous, pagan government. It wasn’t taking directions from Jesus.

The question is rather how Christian voters should act by proxy through their elected representatives. And the dichotomy many Christians make between how Christians should act as members of the Church and how they should act as members of civil society is, in my opinion, a destructive and utterly false one. I also note that the very people who invoke it on one issue disregard it on another, and vice versa. My politically liberal friends typically think that we should vote for Christian values of caring for the poor but should not “impose our morals” on others with respect to issues such as abortion. That position, I am happy to grant, makes even less sense. But the kind of sense it does not make is the same kind of sense that your position does not make:D.
“Charity begins in the home,” means that if your family member needs help, YOU should be the first solution. Family members have an obligation to give back in kind. Next, your neighborhood or small community should be the next level of appeal. That might include your church. If the church gives you help, you will feel grateful in proportion and want to help others or return the money once you get on your feet. Last resort should be a town or city aid society. NEVER the state and NEVER EVER the federal government.
On what do you base this principle? Why stop at the town or city level? This seems entirely arbitrary on your part.
By providing aid through our taxes, the federal government has 1) removed our rightful individual and religious obligation to do something to help others
That doesn’t make any sense. You are doing something to help others when you pay taxes, and when you vote to support such actions with your tax money. The right-wing rhetoric claiming that this is somehow “giving away other people’s money” is utterly specious and as far as I can see has no basis in any traditional Christian understanding of the role of taxation or government. As a voter you are to act for the common good.

And obviously the fact that your tax money goes to do something in no way prevents you from giving additional money to do that same thing on a private level. Why not both/and?
and 2) removed the obligation for the aid receivers to pay anything back.
Funny. I thought that we Christians were to “give hoping for nothing in return”:p.

I do take the point that private/local beneficence does foster social relationships. I certainly think that the more centralized the agency providing the relief, the more indirectly the relief should be provided. In other words, I entirely agree with the principle of subsidiarity as you nicely summarized it above–until you got to your “never” and your “never never.”

Edwin
 
hey we can agree to disagree. If you really believe if welfare social security and medicare ended, the private sector will come in and help the poor, needy and elderly-you have the right to that belief. I’ve looked at how we as a society has done in the past.

hmm, alms house’s, state sanitariums ala bedlam and lock people up if they have “no visible means of support” as they did in the 20’s-50’s

OK maybe Bank of America, Goldman Sachs etc will open up low income housing because at today’s wages (if earn able by the elderly and needy) will not come close to paying current rents. As for medical care, well we’d best leave that up to ER’s as that were the poor will go.

Stop you envy of people getting aid from the state. We give out a heck of a lot more to corporations like GE etal. Why are you so worried about folks on welfare? Fight the good fight not the poor.

OK as I said vote against social programs if you believe that we will pick up the slack.

As far as who I vote for? my pastor has never told us who we should vote for and he should not. I see a greater good in my party even though I have horror at abortion. Gay rights I care less about save for saying they are married as that is not possible.

I am anti war anti abortion and pro socialist! (hey it worked for the early followers)

Glen
 
hey we can agree to disagree. If you really believe if welfare social security and medicare ended, the private sector will come in and help the poor, needy and elderly-you have the right to that belief. I’ve looked at how we as a society has done in the past.

hmm, alms house’s, state sanitariums ala bedlam and lock people up if they have “no visible means of support” as they did in the 20’s-50’s

OK maybe Bank of America, Goldman Sachs etc will open up low income housing because at today’s wages (if earn able by the elderly and needy) will not come close to paying current rents. As for medical care, well we’d best leave that up to ER’s as that were the poor will go.

Stop you envy of people getting aid from the state. We give out a heck of a lot more to corporations like GE etal. Why are you so worried about folks on welfare? Fight the good fight not the poor.

OK as I said vote against social programs if you believe that we will pick up the slack.

As far as who I vote for? my pastor has never told us who we should vote for and he should not. I see a greater good in my party even though I have horror at abortion. Gay rights I care less about save for saying they are married as that is not possible.

I am anti war anti abortion and pro socialist! (hey it worked for the early followers)

Glen
“The Greater Good” has been used to rationalize supporting evil since the dawn of time One should not need their Pastor anyone else to tell them you can’t support a pro -abortion canidate no matter how “good” they are on other issues
 
Say’s You!

I say different and if your pastor is telling you how to vote shame on him.

I hear so often here “render unto casear” when it fits the right wing agenda but when it comes to matters of your right wing agenda it is ok for a priest to get involved in what is a state affair.

Kill the them after birth or allow suffering of hunger, war death etc? But I must as a Catholic support republicans?

Get real my friend! Do you support the death penality? if so your republican vote is wrong by your very own 'test" So if most democrats support the end of the death penality you must vote democrat by your own reasoning or is it avalue you put on the sin?

yes the greater good is a good ideal even if others have misused the notion.

Yes my friend the greater good- Mt 25 read it and see who pass’s the test right wing or left? And please do not tell me welfare and social security have caused poverty because it still is here-cancer is here should we stop clinical trials because they do not work by that reasoning

sick of the right wing stuff!

Glen
 
Say’s You!

I say different and if your pastor is telling you how to vote shame on him.

I hear so often here “render unto casear” when it fits the right wing agenda but when it comes to matters of your right wing agenda it is ok for a priest to get involved in what is a state affair.

Kill the them after birth or allow suffering of hunger, war death etc? But I must as a Catholic support republicans?

Get real my friend! Do you support the death penality? if so your republican vote is wrong by your very own 'test" So if most democrats support the end of the death penality you must vote democrat by your own reasoning or is it avalue you put on the sin?

yes the greater good is a good ideal even if others have misused the notion.

Yes my friend the greater good- Mt 25 read it and see who pass’s the test right wing or left? And please do not tell me welfare and social security have caused poverty because it still is here-cancer is here should we stop clinical trials because they do not work by that reasoning

sick of the right wing stuff!

Glen
The Church has made it clear that none of the issues you mention rise to the level of abortion. Although I pesonally don’t support he Death Penalty the Church allows for it In fact Pope Benedict stated that a catholic could suport the Death penalty but NEVER support abortion
 
Hundred’s of thousands killed in the false name of WMD’s and you worry about voting republican because they SAY they are anti abortion when in fact they support not paying for them.

God gave us a brain for a reason and we must look at the whole picture. I for one hate the plank of “choice” but I feel as it is a law we must as citizens respect those who choose it-Pray for them as any sinner but as oft stated render unto Caesar…

Funny how they want “life” but once born into poverty, then it is up to individual responsibility and pulling one’s self up by the bootstrap.

As for now our country see’s abortion as a medical right. Do we respect our country or pick and choose as many here call cafeteria Catholics?

If you are being told who to vote for in your Church, they are not following the boundary between Church and state.

Love the sinner…Hate the sin

Glen
 
Hundred’s of thousands killed in the false name of WMD’s and you worry about voting republican because they SAY they are anti abortion when in fact they support not paying for them.

God gave us a brain for a reason and we must look at the whole picture. I for one hate the plank of “choice” but I feel as it is a law we must as citizens respect those who choose it-Pray for them as any sinner but as oft stated render unto Caesar…

Funny how they want “life” but once born into poverty, then it is up to individual responsibility and pulling one’s self up by the bootstrap.

**As for now our country see’s abortion as a medical right. Do we respect our country or pick and choose as many here call cafeteria Catholics?
**
If you are being told who to vote for in your Church, they are not following the boundary between Church and state.

Love the sinner…Hate the sin

Glen
We respect our GOD and not 9 men on the Supreme Court who made a very grave error in making abortion legal in all 50 states.

The “cafeteria Catholics” are the ones who say they can be Catholic and yet support contraception and abortion.
 
or allow suffering of hunger, war death etc?
Both parties are equally hawkish in my opinion.

While it may have been once true that the democratic party was against war, it isn’t so much true anymore.

Unfortunately, it is caused by us trying to be peacekeepers too much. Sometimes we should just let other countries fight their own civil wars.

If the UN had gotten involved in our civil war, we’d still be fighting it…
 
That doesn’t make any sense. You are doing something to help others when you pay taxes, and when you vote to support such actions with your tax money. The right-wing rhetoric claiming that this is somehow “giving away other people’s money” is utterly specious and as far as I can see has no basis in any traditional Christian understanding of the role of taxation or government. As a voter you are to act for the common good.

And obviously the fact that your tax money goes to do something in no way prevents you from giving additional money to do that same thing on a private level. Why not both/and?

Funny. I thought that we Christians were to “give hoping for nothing in return”:p.

I do take the point that private/local beneficence does foster social relationships. I certainly think that the more centralized the agency providing the relief, the more indirectly the relief should be provided. In other words, I entirely agree with the principle of subsidiarity as you nicely summarized it above–until you got to your “never” and your “never never.”

Edwin
Jesus said, “Go, sell all your possessions and give to the poor…”, not “Steal others’ possessions and do with it what you see fit”. Taxation is stealing, no matter how you look at it. If you don’t give your money to the government, they will forcefully take it from you and/or throw you in prison and then spend it however they see fit, whether you agree with it or not.

Do you think more or less Churches would exist if there were more taxes? Not only are people trying to tithe to their Churches but they are also forced to give upwards of 40 PERCENT, or even higher in some cases, of their income to the government. Our founding fathers started a revolution because of a 1% tax. During Jesus’ day, the tax rate was 1%, with 3% being the highest at a time of war.

Do you honestly think that the government is good with money? Do you honestly think that none of your money is going to fun abortions, unjust wars and so much more? I can guarantee that there is more blood on your tax money than there is good. Would you rather go to the DMV or AAA? UPS or USPS? Private or public school? The government ruins just about everything it dips its hands into.
 
Funny how folks have used His words against the intent of his teachings.

Help the poor anyway you can is what I read into His mandate to help the poor. If my country takes my tax and others, I have a right and mandate to see an appropriate amount goes to help the poor.

play with words all you want-He will know your heart.

I have never on any social political site seen as much hate of the poor as I do here and it sickens me!

Glen AKA the swan
 
Funny how folks have used His words against the intent of his teachings.

Help the poor anyway you can is what I read into His mandate to help the poor. If my country takes my tax and others, I have a right and mandate to see an appropriate amount goes to help the poor.

play with words all you want-He will know your heart.

I have never on any social political site seen as much hate of the poor as I do here and it sickens me!

Glen AKA the swan
I have to agree Glen it sickens me also. As you say God knows our hearts and our thoughts.
He made it very clear we are to help all who need it and treat all as if it where Jesus Himself.

Whatsoever you do to the least of my brothers you do to me.
 
Funny how folks have used His words against the intent of his teachings.

Help the poor anyway you can is what I read into His mandate to help the poor. If my country takes my tax and others, I have a right and mandate to see an appropriate amount goes to help the poor.

play with words all you want-He will know your heart.

I have never on any social political site seen as much hate of the poor as I do here and it sickens me!

Glen AKA the swan
I have not seen any hate of the poor here and I have not seen anyone ‘play with words’. I have seen disgust in the fact that the government is taking the reigns and doing way more with our money than just giving to the poor. The government does help the poor, but at the expense of using our money for so many other things that are unnecessary. If I knew for sure that all of my tax money was going to help the poor I would have no problem with it. But we all know that isn’t the case.

I have not seen one person on here say not to give to the poor or that they ‘hate’ the poor. That’s a horrible thing to say, especially since no one has said that. Just the opposite, in fact. I have seen multiple people say the government does not have the right to take our money and do what they want with it. Those are two completely different things.

Have a great day!
 
Jesus said, “Go, sell all your possessions and give to the poor…”, not “Steal others’ possessions and do with it what you see fit”. Taxation is stealing, no matter how you look at it.
Why? Give me some support from Scripture or Tradition for this astonishing claim? This is a complete innovation in Christian thought about government, of which there has been a great deal–and yet the people who believe this state it as if it were obvious.

After all, Jesus said very explicitly, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s.” This gets applied in all sorts of mistaken ways, in my opinion, to justify the idea that the government has its own “sphere” of authority in which it is sovereign and shouldn’t be questioned. But the one thing He was clearly talking about was paying taxes.

How can you justify the claim that taxation is stealing?
If you don’t give your money to the government, they will forcefully take it from you and/or throw you in prison and then spend it however they see fit, whether you agree with it or not.
So? How does that make it stealing? The government has the right to tax–Jesus said so.
Do you think more or less Churches would exist if there were more taxes?
I have no idea why that’s a relevant question. The purpose of taxation is not to make more churches exist, but to provide for the common good.
Our founding fathers started a revolution because of a 1% tax.
Well, they aren’t my founding fathers. I am a resident of the U.S., but have never become a citizen–for several reasons, one of which is that I have doubts about the founding ideology of the country.

But granting the legitimacy of what they did (highly dubious in my opinion by any kind of traditional Christian standard as to what constitutes genuine tyranny), that legitimacy stemmed not from the size of the tax but from the fact that they hadn’t consented to it.

Those who think like you are welcome to campaign for lower taxes. But you have no legitimate grounds on which to claim that taxation is theft.
During Jesus’ day, the tax rate was 1%, with 3% being the highest at a time of war.
I’d like to see verification of this, but it may well be true.

One of the reasons government is larger (certainly not the only one) is that Christians have spent 2000 years teaching the importance of care for the poor and concern for the common good.

I share some of your skepticism about government, especially on a large scale. I am entirely in favor of the principle of subsidiarity. I rather like Ron Paul, though I worry about his failure to uphold the concept of the common good. What I worry about most are the pseudo-libertarians who want “small government” when it comes to helping the poor but are all in favor of crony capitalism and a huge military-industrial complex.
Do you honestly think that the government is good with money? Do you honestly think that none of your money is going to fun abortions, unjust wars and so much more? I can guarantee that there is more blood on your tax money than there is good. Would you rather go to the DMV or AAA? UPS or USPS? Private or public school? The government ruins just about everything it dips its hands into.
The government does not have the luxury of only dealing with folks who can pay.

Which I would rather go to is not the issue. The question is whether privatization will help or hurt the people at the “bottom of the ladder.” As a Christian, I’m obligated to think about their needs and not merely my own.

I know that libertarians argue that such people will be helped by wholesale privatization. I’m not convinced.

Edwin
 
Why? Give me some support from Scripture or Tradition for this astonishing claim? This is a complete innovation in Christian thought about government, of which there has been a great deal–and yet the people who believe this state it as if it were obvious.

After all, Jesus said very explicitly, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s.” This gets applied in all sorts of mistaken ways, in my opinion, to justify the idea that the government has its own “sphere” of authority in which it is sovereign and shouldn’t be questioned. But the one thing He was clearly talking about was paying taxes.

How can you justify the claim that taxation is stealing?

I just gave you your support. Jesus said to give your possessions. If someone forcefully takes your money and does with it whatever they want, isn’t that theft? I totally agree, Jesus said to give to Caesar what is Caesar’s. The problem here is that we don’t have a king. Our elected officials represent we, the people. So our money is ours and we are supposed to have control of how it’s spent. We elect officials who represent us. Well, I don’t vote for officials who want to take even more of our money.

So? How does that make it stealing? The government has the right to tax–Jesus said so.

Just because the government has the right to tax does not mean that it isn’t stealing. Like I said, it’s considered stealing if someone takes your money and spends it how they want, even if it’s to feed themselves. It is no different with the government.

I have no idea why that’s a relevant question. The purpose of taxation is not to make more churches exist, but to provide for the common good.
**
My point was that if people are giving 40%+ of their income, how can they afford to tithe another 10%. That’s half of the income right off the top. **

Well, they aren’t my founding fathers. I am a resident of the U.S., but have never become a citizen–for several reasons, one of which is that I have doubts about the founding ideology of the country.

But granting the legitimacy of what they did (highly dubious in my opinion by any kind of traditional Christian standard as to what constitutes genuine tyranny), that legitimacy stemmed not from the size of the tax but from the fact that they hadn’t consented to it.

Those who think like you are welcome to campaign for lower taxes. But you have no legitimate grounds on which to claim that taxation is theft.

**Our founding fathers, mainly the puritans, came here to start a pure Christianity. Our revolution was started to be allowed to express their religious freedom. You aren’t a citizen, yet you live here and reap all of the benefits. Why? Because, even with the insanely high tax rates, this is the freest country in the entire world. The problem is that Socialists are invading our government and are beginning to turn this country into a Secular, Socialist utopia.

Here’s a few popes’ opinions on Socialism …**

***“The socialists wrongly assume the right of property to be of mere human invention . . . and, preaching up the community of goods, declare that … all may with impunity seize upon the possessions and usurp the rights of the wealthy. More wise and profitably, the Church recognizes the existence of inequality amongst men.”

—Leo XIII, Dec. 28, 1878

“No one can be at the same time a sincere Catholic and a true socialist.”

—Pius XI, May 15, 1931***

***“My child, you must not have fear at speaking the truth. It is for the salvation of souls and the recovery of your country. America the beautiful must not fall to communism, My child. America the beautiful shall not be sold into slavery. Cast out the money changers in your government! What manner of government is there that condones sin? Abomination upon abomination–giving monies for the murder of children, giving monies for the murder of the elderly! Your government, My child, has been infiltrated by men of sin.” - Our Lady of the Roses, September 13, 1975

-Pope John Paul II***

I’d like to see verification of this, but it may well be true.

One of the reasons government is larger (certainly not the only one) is that Christians have spent 2000 years teaching the importance of care for the poor and concern for the common good.

I share some of your skepticism about government, especially on a large scale. I am entirely in favor of the principle of subsidiarity. I rather like Ron Paul, though I worry about his failure to uphold the concept of the common good. What I worry about most are the pseudo-libertarians who want “small government” when it comes to helping the poor but are all in favor of crony capitalism and a huge military-industrial complex.

"During the time of Julius Caesar a 1 percent sales tax was imposed. During the time of Caesar Augustus the sales tax was 4 percent for slaves and 1 percent for everything else.1"

taxworld.org/History/TaxHistory.htm

The government does not have the luxury of only dealing with folks who can pay.

Which I would rather go to is not the issue. The question is whether privatization will help or hurt the people at the “bottom of the ladder.” As a Christian, I’m obligated to think about their needs and not merely my own.

I know that libertarians argue that such people will be helped by wholesale privatization. I’m not convinced.

Edwin
 
It isn’t, nor has it ever been, the job of of the government to feed the poor. I have nothing against the government trying to feed the poor. The problem is that they do it completely wrong. There are so many people today who are considered ‘poor’ but who aren’t. Jesus Christ gave that to the Church. In fact, there was an article today where someone received a $900,000 pension and then signed up for unemployment! Who do you think’s paying for that person’s unemployment? Yes, the person paid in but will get way more out of it then they put in. Our welfare state is corrupt and ineffective, period.

Once again, my point was to show that nearly everything the government touches gets ruined. That was the point of our founding fathers starting over. The British government didn’t allow for religious freedom.
 
One more thing. If Hitler were to use the “Pay unto Caesar’s” verse to coerce his people into contributing to the slaughter of the Jews, Catholic Priests and everyone else he slaughtered, would that be legit?

Here’s a good explanation. Read the whole thing. It’s extremely well written, citing historical facts …

yhwh.com/Thoughts/thought_20.htm

And here’s a few of my favorite parts …

***“Tax Collectors are always mentioned in the context of evil sinners. See Matthew 5:46, Matthew 9:10, Mark 2:16 and Luke 18:13 to name a few.”

“Even at its evil worst, the Roman government only extracted 10% of a citizen’s money. And yes, the full Bible witness is that this was evil. And yet, modern America burdens many of its citizens with taxation above 50%.
Taxation remains, morally and philosophically, theft. No amount of rationalization can change that.”***
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top