P
placido
Guest
And faith without works is dead, says James.What about what Eph 2:8-9. It says we are saved by grace through faith and not works. If the Bible says works do not save then works do not save.
And faith without works is dead, says James.What about what Eph 2:8-9. It says we are saved by grace through faith and not works. If the Bible says works do not save then works do not save.
Does your pastor/elder/reverend or member of your family or your friends or members of your church pray for you?Mary can not pray for you for there is only ONE mediator between God and man the Man Christ Jesus.
Hey maybe that would explain why the Mary of the Catholic Church has now reached co-meditrix status. Let’s see venerate versus worship…let’s play a “Bill Clinton”…LOLFocus people--------focus. People have worshipped the Blessed Mother when they didn’t know any better but today we know better.
Napsack, you are failing to distinguish the Mary of the Catholic Church from the Mary of the Bible; that is the real issue and difference. There is no way anyone can, with an honest face, extrapolate the Mary of the Church with the Mary of the Bible unless…It never changes does it. You accuse wrongly and you do not have the facts. I nor anyone I know attacks Mary or hates Mary. That is utter and abject lies. The model of all Christians and the Mother of our Lord is to be honored. This isn’t about what you continue to say over and over again about what you believe truth is. This is about real sustainable truth found in God’s Holy Word and revealed to us through reasoning in the Holy Spirit and revealed again and again through the ancient traditions. You’ve got many of us wrong my friend.
This is truly an amazing post of ignorance. All Saints including Mary are venerated. You should find out what Catholics mean by Communion of Saints. I have posted, as others have, Scripture that hold May in high esteem. Go back through the thread you will find them. The phrase full of grace is not used in Eph.and I tried several versions.The veneration of Mary would be supported by the Bible if it is biblical it is not. There is no evidence from Scripture that mary was held in high esteem as catholics do. if so where. The words full of grace that are used of Mary is also used of Saints in general over in Ehp. Chapter 1. Does this mean that all saints as well have been removed of orginal sin and should be venerated like Mary is?
You are completely missing the point or maybe avoiding it. I agree that Trinity is in scripture but if you ask a Jehovah Witness they would deny it. That Jesus established a Church is undeniable in Scripture. How you miss penance I honestly do not understand:nope: “Who’s sins you forgive” etc. I could provide Scripture reference but this thread is about worship. It has gotten off track.You are completely avoiding the point here. Trinity isn’t named in Scripture but is totally shown and supported throughout Scripture. Roman Catholic, veneration of Mary and penance are unnamed just like Trinity but are also not supported and not sustained by Scripture. Truth is the point here.
By giving honor to Mary that is only due God is not something that is “deep”.
If that were true you wouldn’t be posting the nonsense that you have. No one has yet produced evidence that Catholic believe Mary to be God and that is the only way that worship can occur. So when a man kneels to ask for a woman to marry him it is not worship. When a person kneels with a bible in their hand they are not worshiping the book. In order to know worship, you must be able to look into a person’s mind and see if he believes that he is talking to God. Worship=belief in God.I know worship when I see it.
One verse? How aboutWhat about what Eph 2:8-9. It says we are saved by grace through faith and not works. If the Bible says works do not save then works do not save.
This is very true. None of the persons written about in Scripture are confined to the words of the Holy Writings. They are people, and some of them have very little written about them in the NT. Depending upon the NT as a compendium of Christian history, faith, and practice is definitely a shortcoming.Napsack, you are failing to distinguish the Mary of the Catholic Church from the Mary of the Bible; that is the real issue and difference. There is no way anyone can, with an honest face, extrapolate the Mary of the Church with the Mary of the Bible unless…
Scenario 1)** Catholic prays "Mary please intercede to your Son on my behalf I am having surgery tomorrowDoes your pastor/elder/reverend or member of your family or your friends or members of your church pray for you?
After you said “yes”, let me ask you why: have they become the One mediator between God and man?
You see a difference? Well I do see oneScenario 1)** Catholic prays "Mary please intercede to your Son on my behalf I am having surgery tomorrow
—> Mary prays:Son please grant mercy and Grace to Mr or Miss Catholic ---->>> THE SON replies ; okay
**
Scenario 2) **Mr Protestant asks"Hey Bill pray for me; I have surgery tomorrow------------> Bill prays "Father, Who art in heaven …be with Bill and grant Him your comfort and healing…
**
I hope you can see the difference between to two, they are not very similar. Mr. Protestant is not praying to Bill. But Mr/Miss Catholic is praying to Mary, a form of worship, asking the Son to intercede. This is a nonbiblical model for prayer.
Jesus listens to his mother but in you example there is no difference both are asking someone else rather than going straight to Jesus. Sorry your example fails miserably.5Code:(And) Jesus said to her, "Woman, how does your concern affect me? My hour has not yet come."
His mother said to the servers, “Do whatever he tells you.”
6
5 Now there were six stone water jars there for Jewish ceremonial washings, each holding twenty to thirty gallons.
7
Jesus told them, “Fill the jars with water.” So they filled them to the brim.
8
Then he told them, “Draw some out now and take it to the headwaiter.” 6 So they took it.
9
And when the headwaiter tasted the water that had become wine, without knowing where it came from (although the servers who had drawn the water knew), the headwaiter called the bridegroom
10
and said to him, “Everyone serves good wine first, and then when people have drunk freely, an inferior one; but you have kept the good wine until now.”
Sorry - your are not biblical - and that is because you don’t use a bible - you wrongly think a Protestant book is a bible. Your problem is Luther stripped out all the OT bible texts that he did not want you to see so he could dupe you into believing his false teachings and start a new man-made church. Therefor you need to see the full written word of God before you start calling somone non-biblical since you don’t know what a bible is. Go pick up a Catholic Bible that had all the books that The Church used for 1,000 years before Luther ripped out 7 books.This is a nonbiblical model for prayer.
Scenario 1)** Catholic prays "Mary please intercede to your Son on my behalf I am having surgery tomorrow
—> Mary prays:Son please grant mercy and Grace to Mr or Miss Catholic ---->>> THE SON replies ; okay
**
Scenario 2) Mr Protestant asks"Hey Bill pray for me; I have surgery tomorrow------------> Bill prays "Father, Who art in heaven …be with Bill and grant Him your comfort and healing…
First, “to pray” means to ask / to request, e.g. “pray be seated”.
Secondly, your two scenarios admit that to ask Mary to pray for you is possible, but is different from asking Bill Protestant to pray for you.
I tend to agree with you here because the prayer of the righteous avails much.
Whatever you call it, the fact is Mr. Protestant is asking someone else to pray for him - contrary to DLC’s “one mediator”:
DLC:![]()
Mary can not pray for you for there is only ONE mediator between God and man the Man Christ Jesus.
Scenario 1)** Catholic prays "Mary please intercede to your Son on my behalf I am having surgery tomorrow
—> Mary prays:Son please grant mercy and Grace to Mr or Miss Catholic ---->>> THE SON replies ; okay
**
Scenario 2) **Mr Protestant asks"Hey Bill pray for me; I have surgery tomorrow------------> Bill prays "Father, Who art in heaven …be with Bill and grant Him your comfort and healing…
**
If you consult your dictionary you will find that the word “pray” is not defined as “worship”. Here are four meanings of “pray” in Webster’s: 1. To utter petition to God 2. To make a fervent request; plead 3. To beseech; implore 4. to make a devout and earnest request for. Mr. Protestant certainly isn’t worshipping Billy for not petitioning God directly, is he? Nor is Ms Catholic worshipping Mary by imploring the Mother of our Lord to intercede on her behalf before her Son who is God, one with the Father. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit form a single conscious entity. I’m afraid there is nothing unbiblical here unless our understanding of the nature of the Holy Trinity is false and that of the Mormons is true.I hope you can see the difference between to two, they are not very similar. Mr. Protestant is not praying to Bill. But Mr/Miss Catholic is praying to Mary, a form of worship, asking the Son to intercede. This is a nonbiblical model for prayer.
Actually they are the same. In both cases you are asking someone to ask Jesus to help you.Scenario 1)** Catholic prays "Mary please intercede to your Son on my behalf I am having surgery tomorrow
—> Mary prays:Son please grant mercy and Grace to Mr or Miss Catholic ---->>> THE SON replies ; okay
**
Scenario 2) **Mr Protestant asks"Hey Bill pray for me; I have surgery tomorrow------------> Bill prays "Father, Who art in heaven …be with Bill and grant Him your comfort and healing…
**
I hope you can see the difference between to two, they are not very similar. Mr. Protestant is not praying to Bill. But Mr/Miss Catholic is praying to Mary, a form of worship, asking the Son to intercede. This is a nonbiblical model for prayer.
I’ve seen ignorance in handling Scripture around here, but you may take the cake. I hope you will begin to read and study and beg God for understanding for the sake of your soul.You see a difference? Well I do see one
Jesus listens to his mother but in you example there is no difference both are asking someone else rather than going straight to Jesus. Sorry your example fails miserably.![]()
Again NC - you are offering your own unsubstantiated opinion. Can you demonstrate that you are not ignorant and opinionated by making a convincing argument to back up your claims? What makes your private interpretation of scripture any more enlightened than Brother Bubba who is preaching down the road at Bubba’s Bible Church or the lawnboy’s?I’ve seen ignorance in handling Scripture around here, but you may take the cake. I hope you will begin to read and study and beg God for understanding for the sake of your soul.
I understand you loud and clear and my whole point is that the Mary of the Bible and the Mary of Catholic theology are two different entities. Mary is the Mother of our Lord and one of the most model Christians to ever live, but she is not divine. However, that does not sustain the titles of “Queen of Heaven” or “Our Holy Mother” as is found in Catholicism. The Scriptures and ancient traditions for that matter paint a much different picture of Mary as does the Catholic church.Napsack, you are failing to distinguish the Mary of the Catholic Church from the Mary of the Bible; that is the real issue and difference. There is no way anyone can, with an honest face, extrapolate the Mary of the Church with the Mary of the Bible unless…