C
Cathoholic
Guest
Cathoholic . . .
ForeverLearn . . .
The problem with applying that theory here, is to do so, you ignored the “backed-up” portion of my statement and equivocated to an ONLY “personal testimony” paradigm.
Here it is again . . .
There is ancillary evidence as to what he is saying.
Perhaps if the “neutral media” would cover that, everyone here would be aware of these items.
As it is, the “neutral media” has been purpisefully trying to fool you and I
by deep-sixing the story. At least until AFTER the election.
.The “media” isn’t the person putting forth these backed-up statements. Bobulinski is.
ForeverLearn . . .
.Personal testimony is one of the most unreliable sources of evidence.
The problem with applying that theory here, is to do so, you ignored the “backed-up” portion of my statement and equivocated to an ONLY “personal testimony” paradigm.
Here it is again . . .
Bold added.The “media” isn’t the person putting forth these backed-up statements. Bobulinski is.
There is ancillary evidence as to what he is saying.
Perhaps if the “neutral media” would cover that, everyone here would be aware of these items.
As it is, the “neutral media” has been purpisefully trying to fool you and I
by deep-sixing the story. At least until AFTER the election.
Last edited: