T
Tomster
Guest
Exactly!People who once had grace… No longer had it. That is fatal to imputed righteousness as you understand it.
Exactly!People who once had grace… No longer had it. That is fatal to imputed righteousness as you understand it.
It is the same meaning.While this is only part of the overall issue, I’d like to ask if you think “imputed” is the only way to translate the word “logizesthai”? What evidence speaks for this translation over and against, say, “reckoned”?
You have yet to explain why Paul is telling born again Christians that they have fallen from grace. Or why Jesus is telling His disciples to keep the commandments, and that those who call him Lord but work inquity will not be saved.I’m sorry that you are not comprehending plain English.
because I am a sinner and we are to confess our sins. Do you think the unsaved would confess their sins? No, the saved do. Is this really foreign to you?
'Alex to Iggy." “Alex to Iggy.”I’m sorry that you are not comprehending plain English.
because I am a sinner and we are to confess our sins. Do you think the unsaved would confess their sins? No, the saved do. Is this really foreign to you?
It isn’t the same thing; if I say “I reckon you’re right”, I mean I think you actually are right. “Imputation” suggests a certain quality of fakeness–as though God were just pretending something is there when, really and truly, it isn’t. “Reckon” leaves open the interpretation that God is recognizing justice as a real attribute of the faithful man.It is the same meaning.
λογίζομαι
logizomai
log-id’-zom-ahee
Middle voice from G3056; to take an inventory, that is, estimate (literally or figuratively): - conclude, (ac-) count (of), + despise, esteem, impute, lay, number, reason, reckon, suppose, think (on).
As having once left the Church (after being Catholic for almost 30 years myself) and also thinking I knew the teachings yet rejected some of them (confession to a priest as just one example), I came to understand eventually that I had indeed misconstrued the Church’s teachings. I was of that very mindset - that I had been a Catholic for 30 years and I had learned all that mattered and disagreed with some of it. I have to tell you I was sincere. Sincerely wrong, but still sincere. As a matter of fact, I am still learning. And I probably will until I die. Even if I choose to study my faith to the exclusion of all else for the rest of my life, there will always be more to learn. And the more I learn, the more excited and amazed by what is the Catholic faith.I know you sincerely think you are right, but you are sincerely wrong.![]()
Why do you leave out one of the most important verses in Heb 10?I’m going to venture a try to get this thread back on topic while also answering the imputed righteousness stuff.
We see in Scripture that justification is lost by grave sin
[BIBLEDRB]Heb 10:26-27[/BIBLEDRB]
What are they breaking? Bread.[BIBLEDRB]1 Cor 10:16[/BIBLEDRB]
There were those that were treating the Lord’s supper as any other meal, to the point of drunkeness, not doing what they were told, and that is partaking in remembrance of Christ.But the sinner must also:
[BIBLEDRB]1 Cor 11:27-30[/BIBLEDRB]
He doesn’t. Born again Christians do not rely on the law to justify them.You have yet to explain why Paul is telling born again Christians that they have fallen from grace.
Let’s talk about Romans 8:38-39 shall we?He doesn’t. Born again Christians do not rely on the law to justify them.
Depends if it is a venial sin or mortal sin.Because I am a sinner and we are told to confess our sins. Do you think the unsaved would confess their sins? No, the saved do. Is this really foreign to you?
Do you only confess your sins because you are UNSAVED? Do you confess your sin to be saved?
Do you not understand that no one confesses unless God has changed them, made them new creations in Christ, and given them a new heart?
Are you suggesting that every time you commit a sin, you become UNCHANGED?
No, John is speaking to the saved.That’s before Justification–
No, not at all. Are you suggesting that the justified do not sin?or are you denying that the blood of Christ washes us?
38 For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, 39 nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.Let’s talk about Romans 8:38-39 shall we?
No such thing. Sin is sin. The wages of SIN is death.Depends if it is a venial sin or mortal sin.
We are sinners, that is why we sin. Salvation doesn’t make anyone sinless. Are you having a hard time understanding grace? Were sin abounds, grace abounds even more. You can’t out sin God’s grace.You still have not answered the question: How can one be in a state of sin and still be saved?
How do you know with certainty that the language He uses in this verse is metaphorical?Yes, wonderful verse. Doesn’t negate the fact that Jesus OFTEN used metaphorical language.
Here’s something for you to chew on. One is not saved until the split second AFTER one dies. It is then that God judges us and we will then know with absolute certainty what our eternal destiny is.Because I am a sinner and we are told to confess our sins. Do you think the unsaved would confess their sins? No, the saved do. Is this really foreign to you?
Do you only confess your sins because you are UNSAVED? Do you confess your sin to be saved?
Do you not understand that no one confesses unless God has changed them, made them new creations in Christ, and given them a new heart?
Are you suggesting that every time you commit a sin, you become UNCHANGED?