E
ExCatholicGuy
Guest
My take on transubstantiation is simple: I do not believe that the incantations of a man can transform a piece of bread into God.
I see, so you don’t believe a Priest given authority through the laying of hands on him has cannot through Jesus Christ consecrate the host.My take on transubstantiation is simple: I do not believe that the incantations of a man can transform a piece of bread into God.
Well, I don’t believe that Jesus was the son of God, so what he did or said doesn’t matter to me. And I don’t believe that the Bible (or any other text) is an accurate, definitive record of God’s interaction with man.I see, so you don’t believe a Priest given authority through the laying of hands on him has cannot through Jesus Christ consecrate the host.
Do you believe the Apostles through Jesus Christ could perform any miracles, blessings, consecrations? or could lay their hands on other future men to ordain them? Are these future ordained men not able to perform any of their duties (such as consecration of the host) then?
What do you believe friend? God exists, and we have evidence that is contained in scriptures?Well, I don’t believe that Jesus was the son of God, so what he did or said doesn’t matter to me. And I don’t believe that the Bible (or any other text) is an accurate, definitive record of God’s interaction with man.
Guy,My take on transubstantiation is simple: I do not believe that the incantations of a man can transform a piece of bread into God.
Guy,Well, I don’t believe that Jesus was the son of God, so what he did or said doesn’t matter to me. And I don’t believe that the Bible (or any other text) is an accurate, definitive record of God’s interaction with man.
God exists - that’s the most I can be sure of through reason.What do you believe friend? God exists, and we have evidence that is contained in scriptures?
My question is then, God exists, but he didn’t provide us to the path towards our salvation? are we to live trying to get close to him without any guidance ?
I can’t even conceive of God having a son. He could if he wanted to, of course. But the concept of “son” is something so rooted in the human existence that I just don’t think of God having one, any more than I think of Him having a nose, or ears or hair.Guy,
Then you believe in God believing that if God had a Son it was not Jesus and that if there was a record of God’s interaction of man it would not be the Bible…however it appears you believe in God…time to start over for you I guess…![]()
I see, friend. Tell me and you decide what is good and what is bad according to what God says to you, then?God exists - that’s the most I can be sure of through reason.
I don’t believe we need a path to salvation because I don’t believe we are inherently doomed.
There’s certainly tremendous wisdom in the Bible, and in that sense it’s inspired by God. God does speak to us, but His voice is subtle - it’s not a set of doctrines and dogmas pronounced over the centuries by councils of old men.
That is exactly what the enemy wamts you to believe. I suppose you don’t believe we even have a spiritual enemy which is also what he wants you to believe. If you believe in God then I suggest you pray for guidance, wisdom and discernment and I mean that with all charity.God exists - that’s the most I can be sure of through reason.
I don’t believe we need a path to salvation because I don’t believe we are inherently doomed.
I don’t “decide”. I just try to figure it out. And that effort does include listening to the great wisdom contained in scripture and church teachings.I see, friend. Tell me and you decide what is good and what is bad according to what God says to you, then?
In other words, you “decide” based on what you “accept” from scripture and Church teachings, and also what you “reject” from scripture and Church teachings…I don’t “decide”. I just try to figure it out. And that effort does include listening to the great wisdom contained in scripture and church teachings.
I accept what I find consistent with reason, and reject what I don’t. I believe that’s why God gave us the ability to reason.In other words, you “decide” based on what you “accept” from scripture and Church teachings, and also what you “reject” from scripture and Church teachings…
I see, friend.I accept what I find consistent with reason, and reject what I don’t. I believe that’s why God gave us the ability to reason.
Its why Free Will was given. You must also believe God is infinitely beyond your ability to reason in the finite, which you do believe if you believe in God. So then the conversation isn’t what God could and couldn’t do for he could anything and often way beyond the finite understanding.I accept what I find consistent with reason, and reject what I don’t. I believe that’s why God gave us the ability to reason.
Guy,I can’t even conceive of God having a son. He could if he wanted to, of course. But the concept of “son” is something so rooted in the human existence that I just don’t think of God having one, any more than I think of Him having a nose, or ears or hair.
The Hebrew expression “son of man” (בן–אדם i.e. ben-'adam) appears one hundred and seven times in the Hebrew Bible.[1] This is the most common Hebrew construction for the singular and appears 93 times in Ezekiel alone and 14 times elsewhere.[2] In thirty two cases the phrase appears in intermediate plural form “sons of men”, i.e. human beings.[1]
andWithin the Hebrew Bible, the first place one comes across the phrase son of man is in Book of Numbers 23:19:
The idea of a Son should come easily. Man you should have no trouble with.The employment of the expression in the Gospels is very remarkable. It is used to designate Jesus Christ no fewer than eighty-one times — thirty times in St. Matthew, fourteen times in St. Mark, twenty-five times in St. Luke, and twelve times in St. John.
Then you are creating a god in your own image, someone who is limited by your reason.I accept what I find consistent with reason, and reject what I don’t. I believe that’s why God gave us the ability to reason.
I don’t claim to understand God. But those men who so confidently defined the minutia of Catholic beliefs over the centuries certainly seemed to think they did!Then you are creating a god in your own image, someone who is limited by your reason.
As St. Augustine said, “If you can understand Him, He is not God.”
Excellent.I don’t claim to understand God.
Well, it’s part of the commandment of God to try to love Him entirely with our MIND.But those men who so confidently defined the minutia of Catholic beliefs over the centuries certainly seemed to think they did!