Trent Horn - Does it matter which Christian denomination you belong to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Er, yes. I do have the gift of knowledge. It is nothing supernatural, though.
Well then that is not the gifting I was talking about that is supernatural as in gift of knowledge, by the holy Spirit
It is simply applying logic and reason.
That for sure.
I see the logical consequences of the belief of not deferring to any man/church when it comes to reading and interpreting the Bible.
As there are consequences from deferring too much , unconditionally.
And you cannot deny that what I described–men starting their own Protestant churches when they disagree with their pastor–is not a phenomenon.
Yes, especially if a “congregation” is a"church", in which case many are also formed not out of disagreement but simply “branching out”.
And you cannot deny that this is the fruit of the Protestant Reformation put into practice.
Absolutely. Without freedom of choice and conscience and separation of church ans state it would have been different in scale.(You have always had folks disagreeing and starting their own thing, beginning with Gnostics, Montanists, Arians etc…)
Either you all had permission to divorce yourselves from the authority of the Catholic Church…and that means that every man can divorce himself from his authority/pastor…
Men in your church cannot simply say, “I disagree with what my church says. The church is wrong and if they don’t correct it, I will have to leave and start my own church”…and that means that Fr. Martin Luther et al were wrong…and the Protestant Reformation is repugnant to God.
Maybe they were wrong to leave but the Church was wrong in what she was promoting.

While the CC teaches, claims infallibility now she also says (and from day1) it is wrong to obey, follow false teachings, and even prophets , even churches.

Blessings
 
Or an Apostle?
Well it is more evident they were apostles as in missionaries and were proclaiming the gospel,even also imprisoned for it. As far as being female, might be.Historians seem to be split. Could be two men, or brother and sister, or husband wife.(Rom 16:7)
 
As there are consequences from deferring too much , unconditionally.
You are making an implied criticism of Catholicism here, and it is based on misinformation.

No Catholic must defer unconditionally to the Church.
Yes, especially if a “congregation” is a"church", in which case many are also formed not out of disagreement but simply “branching out”.
Of course I am not talking about congregations which have branched out. If they have the same doctrines, the same authority, they are the same denomination.

But you must acknowledge, because of the Protestant Reformation’s mantra, that it has led to the idea that if the pastor preaches something you believe to be contrary to the Bible, you are free to leave and start your own church.
 
(You have always had folks disagreeing and starting their own thing, beginning with Gnostics, Montanists, Arians etc…)
You do see what you have just asserted: Protestantism is another heresy, like Gnosticism, Montanism, Arianism.

That is, you are correct here, even though you are unintentionally so.
 
You do see what you have just asserted: Protestantism is another heresy, like Gnosticism, Montanism, Arianism.

That is, you are correct here, even though you are unintentionally so.
You seem to be confused about what heresy actually is , a denial of an essential of the faith , which we have NEVER done.

And hello, separated brethren ( that’s us ) doesn’t equal false brethren ( i.e. Actual heretics)

Keep the faith Starwars 🙂
 
You seem to be confused about what heresy actually is , a denial of an essential of the faith , which we have NEVER done.

And hello, separated brethren ( that’s us ) doesn’t equal false brethren ( i.e. Actual heretics)

Keep the faith Starwars 🙂
Oh, yes. You cannot be accused of being a heretic.

But the people who originally started the Prot Reformation were indeed heretics. They denied essentials of the faith.
 
Oh, yes. You cannot be accused of being a heretic.

But the people who originally started the Prot Reformation were indeed heretics. They denied essentials of the faith.
They denied nothing of the creeds nor the scriptures, so no they are not heretics .

Keep the faith PRmerger , Starwars 🙂
 
They denied nothing of the creeds nor the scriptures, so no they are not heretics .

Keep the faith PRmerger , Starwars 🙂
Sorry, Star, but you don’t get to define what the criteria are for being a heretic.

And what does it mean to “deny nothing of the Scriptures” anyway? Some of the heretics used Scripture to make some very heretical statements.

St. Augustine said as much, saying, (paraphrasing): every single heretic can use Scripture to back up his heresy.
 
Sorry, Star, but you don’t get to define what the criteria are for being a heretic.

And what does it mean to “deny nothing of the Scriptures” anyway? Some of the heretics used Scripture to make some very heretical statements.

St. Augustine said as much, saying, (paraphrasing): every single heretic can use Scripture to back up his heresy.
I’m not the one who made the definition, anyway did they deny the doctrines of the church councils, no , how about the ecumenical creeds ,no , did they deny what was taught in tradition no , yes heretics use scripture but hears the key , they use it out of context and ignored large portions of scripture, the reformers did not , so the ONLY reason why they were falsely excommunicated is that they disagreed with the pope s teaching and abuse of power , and they stuck with Christ s teaching instead, which is not heresy .

Keep the faith PRmerger , Starwars 🙂
 
I’m not the one who made the definition,
Certainly, you did.

At any rate, you still need to address the fact that you believe the Church did not err, with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, in discerning the canon of the NT.

Can you acknowledge this?

I’m quite certain you have done so, without explicitly admitting such.

And that means that you believe in the charism of infallibility.

At least, as it applies to the canon of the NT.
 
Certainly, you did.

At any rate, you still need to address the fact that you believe the Church did not err, with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, in discerning the canon of the NT.

Can you acknowledge this?

I’m quite certain you have done so, without explicitly admitting such.

And that means that you believe in the charism of infallibility.

At least, as it applies to the canon of the NT.
Yes, the Church did get the canon of the NT right with the assistance of the Holy Spirit , however there is a difference in believing that the church can’t error , and believing it can error but has the Holy Spirit guiding her.
 
Yes, the Church did get the canon of the NT right with the assistance of the Holy Spirit , however there is a difference in believing that the church can’t error , and believing it can error but has the Holy Spirit guiding her.
All mammals make milk…it’s coming.

PR?
 
Yes, the Church did get the canon of the NT right with the assistance of the Holy Spirit , however there is a difference in believing that the church can’t error , and believing it can error but has the Holy Spirit guiding her.
Well, tell me then, does the ELCA (with the direction of the Holy Spirit) believe that abortion and practicing homosexuality are not sins according to the Bible?
 
Yes, the Church did get the canon of the NT right with the assistance of the Holy Spirit , however there is a difference in believing that the church can’t error , and believing it can error but has the Holy Spirit guiding her.
Well, the 2nd one is nothing but an articulation of the charism of infallibility.

IF the Holy Spirit is guiding her, AND you feel assured that the Church didn’t err on the 27 book canon…

THEN, you believe that the CC was INFALLIBLE on this 27 book canon.
 
This may be slightly off topic, but I think the following is an example of error. The caveat is that I saw it on a news documentary show on Fox News. If there is another explanation for it that disproves what I am saying, let me know because I will stand corrected if I inadvertently misrepresented something.
There’s a fundamental difference between the Church teaching error, and a particular priest/bishop, parish, or even diocese accepting error. The Church has sinners in it, and they will sin. There will be people who defy Church teaching, and those who accept or tolerate it. That is why many of the NT letters were written, to bring wayward groups back into line. We have seen it in the past in Christian history with the Arian heresy, when the majority of bishops and Christians accepted Arianism. But the Church and the Pope did not. And eventually this heresy was rejected and fell away. Same with the example you give below, this fascination and tolerance of homosexual sin will not change Church teaching on it, and eventually it will fall away and the truth will remain.
My wife and I are conservative evangelical Christians. I want to attend a more traditional church than the one we currently attend and am considering Catholicism. However, my wife is very anti-Catholic, but she became a little more open to it out of respect to my interest and from what she saw of Pope Francis during his US visit. She likes him a lot, as do I.
Good to hear. Thank you and a thank you to your wife for at least being willing to listen and consider our view.
We sat down a few weeks ago and saw a TV program called *‘Losing Faith In America’ *or something to that effect with Bill Hemmer on Fox News around the same time of Pope’s visit to the US.
The program focused on different Christian denominations and how Christianity is losing adherents in the US. It also spent a significant amount of time on the issue of homosexuality. It focused on a Catholic church in New York City called St Paul the Apostle and a program they have called outatstpaul.org/.
Yes, Christianity is losing adherents, in all sectors, among all denominations. The current fad of militant autonomy and complete rejection of authority has caused Christians everywhere to believe they can determine truth and set doctrine, which they can’t.
My first thought was that it was an outreach to the LGBT community to help point them to Christ. In other words, “hate the sin but love the sinner” kind of program, which we would welcome and embrace as the proper Christian thing to do.
However, as the program progressed, it became apparent that not only was there a portion of that parish that was openly gay – and I think they said the priest was, too --, but they were proud to be gay and lesbian Catholics and were open about their sexuality and their membership in the Catholic Church, along with taking the sacraments.
I don’t know too much about the group you mentioned or the TV special, but let me just say in general (because I can’t speak specifically about them) that it is scandalous and horrible when supposedly Catholic groups promote open heresy. It promotes error and sin, and causes the weak in faith to lose their faith. As we see with yourself and your wife, it also causes those who would be open to learning about the faith to turn away. It’s absolutely tragic and awful when Catholics sin like that.
That was a ‘fingernails across the chalkboard’ moment for especially my wife, and I was totally caught off-guard by this. I couldn’t defend it. I kept telling her that I didn’t think Catholicism approves of homosexual behavior and that it was an anomaly, but that did more to undo my efforts to portray Catholicism in a positive traditional and conservative light than anything I could think of. She looked at me with one of those, "…and you’re thinking of joining *that kind of church *?
Well first thing, don’t try to defend it in the sense of hiding or ignoring it. Let’s be upfront and honest, the Church has many heretics and apostates in her ranks. And we need good, faithful Christians to join and help us to fight against them. The greatest gift we could give Jesus is to diligently fight against those who wish to destroy or deform His Church, His Bride.

Be assured of this though, the teachings of the Church do not approve of homosexual actions, and never will. They are sinful. And no amount of Catholic groups, priests or even bishops will ever change that.
It kind of put things back to ‘square one’ with her and it came across to me as Catholicism’s toleration of error if not subtle acceptance of a sinful lifestyle. I realize that some mainline Protestant denominations do likewise, but we don’t belong to such a liberal denomination as that. It was big turn-off to us and came across as tolerance of error if the TV program accurately portrayed what was happening correctly.
Toleration of error is nauseating, trust me. It’s tough down here in the trenches, fighting against those who wish to introduce error to the Church. And we need all the help we can get. But remember, Jesus didn’t promise us an easy life, He promised us a cross of our own. This toleration of error and modernism that we are fighting today is our cross. And we’ll keep fighting, and we’ll stay with the Church, because she has the sacraments, especially the Eucharist. We don’t abandon our home to those who wish to destroy it. We fight them and eventually, we WILL repel them and the Church will remain.
 
There’s a fundamental difference between the Church teaching error, and a particular priest/bishop, parish, or even diocese accepting error. The Church has sinners in it, and they will sin. There will be people who defy Church teaching, and those who accept or tolerate it. That is why many of the NT letters were written, to bring wayward groups back into line. We have seen it in the past in Christian history with the Arian heresy, when the majority of bishops and Christians accepted Arianism. But the Church and the Pope did not. And eventually this heresy was rejected and fell away. Same with the example you give below, this fascination and tolerance of homosexual sin will not change Church teaching on it, and eventually it will fall away and the truth will remain.

Good to hear. Thank you and a thank you to your wife for at least being willing to listen and consider our view.

Yes, Christianity is losing adherents, in all sectors, among all denominations. The current fad of militant autonomy and complete rejection of authority has caused Christians everywhere to believe they can determine truth and set doctrine, which they can’t.

I don’t know too much about the group you mentioned or the TV special, but let me just say in general (because I can’t speak specifically about them) that it is scandalous and horrible when supposedly Catholic groups promote open heresy. It promotes error and sin, and causes the weak in faith to lose their faith. As we see with yourself and your wife, it also causes those who would be open to learning about the faith to turn away. It’s absolutely tragic and awful when Catholics sin like that.

Well first thing, don’t try to defend it in the sense of hiding or ignoring it. Let’s be upfront and honest, the Church has many heretics and apostates in her ranks. And we need good, faithful Christians to join and help us to fight against them. The greatest gift we could give Jesus is to diligently fight against those who wish to destroy or deform His Church, His Bride.

Be assured of this though, the teachings of the Church do not approve of homosexual actions, and never will. They are sinful. And no amount of Catholic groups, priests or even bishops will ever change that.

Toleration of error is nauseating, trust me. It’s tough down here in the trenches, fighting against those who wish to introduce error to the Church. And we need all the help we can get. But remember, Jesus didn’t promise us an easy life, He promised us a cross of our own. This toleration of error and modernism that we are fighting today is our cross. And we’ll keep fighting, and we’ll stay with the Church, because she has the sacraments, especially the Eucharist. We don’t abandon our home to those who wish to destroy it. We fight them and eventually, we WILL repel them and the Church will remain.
Thanks, zz912. The more I thought and prayed about it, the more I have come to realize that there may be things going on in the background in this story that I may not be aware of and I am sure that the majority of Catholic parishes are doing the Lord’s work and are “fighting the good fight”. God is still in control and I need to keep that in mind and not be discouraged.
 
Thanks, zz912. The more I thought and prayed about it, the more I have come to realize that there may be things going on in the background in this story that I may not be aware of and I am sure that the majority of Catholic parishes are doing the Lord’s work and are “fighting the good fight”. God is still in control and I need to keep that in mind and not be discouraged.
Matthew 16:18 And I tell you that you are Kepha, and on this kepha I will build my church, and** the gates of Hades will not overcome it**.

Keep the faith. The Church is protected by God (Holy Spirit). And we need more folks like you and your wife here in the trenches of the Church Militant! :D:thumbsup:
 
Thanks, zz912. The more I thought and prayed about it, the more I have come to realize that there may be things going on in the background in this story that I may not be aware of and I am sure that the majority of Catholic parishes are doing the Lord’s work and are “fighting the good fight”. God is still in control and I need to keep that in mind and not be discouraged.
Based on my observations, the majority of Catholic parishes are doing the Lord’s work, but the enemy is relentless.
 
Well on female apostles , look no further than the Apostle Junia .
and this is why it matters. The end result of Protestantism and every protestant theology is every person being their own church and own authority. Not that it was the design, but it is the result. tens of thousands and continue. a new church just popped up down the road. I think it’s called the 5th First Holy Church of Christ Reformed and Illuminated. I’m not joking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top