Trump’s Support Drops in Military Communities

  • Thread starter Thread starter randomuser
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jig_Saw said:
Wow. Someone has a really warped view of Reagan. He was America first all the way. He would not see the wisdom in a Russian dictator. Sad.
Click to expand...
I think 7 was right about a lot that you can’t agree with.
7_Sorrows said:
:nope::nope::nope: you are wrong on all 3 counts!

Reagan would see the patriotism of Trump and his love for America and his desire to help the American people. Reagan would see Putin as a wise world leader frustrated
by what he sees happening now in America. Putin sees an election was held last November, a new President was elected, Obama is not our president anymore, Hillary lost, and everyone is waiting to see what direction our country is going. But we have
the media, the democrats who are bitter over their loss who are doing everything in
their power to create chaos and discontent and prevent Trump from governing.
Click to expand...
I don’t know what Reagan would think about Putin and neither do you. Things are certainly different now, there is no Soviet Union.

But the parts where 7 Sorrows said, " a new President was elected, Obama is not our president anymore, Hillary lost, and everyone is waiting to see what direction our country is going. But we have
the media, the democrats who are bitter over their loss who are doing everything in
their power to create chaos and discontent and prevent Trump from governing."

Those are right on the money.

btw, it’s good to hear admiration of Reagan from a democrat.
 
Jig_Saw said:
Wow. Someone has a really warped view of Reagan. He was America first all the way. He would not see the wisdom in a Russian dictator. Sad.
Click to expand...
Military families (the subject of the news story) liked Reagan better, did they not?
 
St_Pancake said:
I think 7 was right about a lot that you can’t agree with.

I don’t know what Reagan would think about Putin and neither do you. Things are certainly different now, there is no Soviet Union.
Click to expand...
Oh, I think we can infer that Reagan would not be a fan of Putin. I think anyone arguing otherwise doesn’t remember Reagan or studied him carefully.
But the parts where 7 Sorrows said, " a new President was elected, Obama is not our president anymore, Hillary lost, and everyone is waiting to see what direction our country is going. But we have
the media, the democrats who are bitter over their loss who are doing everything in
their power to create chaos and discontent and prevent Trump from governing."
Click to expand...
Those are right on the money.
Click to expand...
Yes, the problem with Trump’s governing is that the democrats are creating chaos. Again, the alternative reality. The Republicans control both houses of Congress and the White House. They can do whatever they want. The fact that they can’t get anything done speaks more to the chaos created by Trump and the inability of Republicans to govern.
btw, it’s good to hear admiration of Reagan from a democrat.
Click to expand...
I’m not a Democrat. I did admire a lot of Reagan because he had core beliefs. I don’t see a lot of core beliefs from Republicans anymore. Haven’t for a long time. Sad.
 
Jig_Saw said:
Oh yes. The military were big supporters of Reagan. Not so much of Trump apparently. Sad.
Click to expand...
Like another poster said - I wouldn’t put your trust in polls. They sure didn’t work for
Hillary.
 
St_Pancake said:
I think 7 was right about a lot that you can’t agree with.

I don’t know what Reagan would think about Putin and neither do you. Things are certainly different now, there is no Soviet Union.

But the parts where 7 Sorrows said, " a new President was elected, Obama is not our president anymore, Hillary lost, and everyone is waiting to see what direction our country is going. But we have
the media, the democrats who are bitter over their loss who are doing everything in
their power to create chaos and discontent and prevent Trump from governing."

Those are right on the money.

btw, it’s good to hear admiration of Reagan from a democrat.
Click to expand...
I think Reagan would respect he was twice elected President of Russia. You are right,
things are different now since the Soviet Union no longer exists. Reagan would respect
Putin as a world leader who also has battled terrorism. Reagan would not be naive, but
he would see Putin as intelligent and would want to work on maintaining good relations with him as did George W. Bush who invited him to his Texas ranch.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Like another poster said - I wouldn’t put your trust in polls. They sure didn’t work for
Hillary.
Click to expand...
They worked fine for Hillary. They said she would win by 4%. She won by 2%. That’s within the margin of error.

That’s like saying that Trump’s 36%-56% approval/disapproval poll is really 37%/55%. Maybe it is, but he is still quite unpopular.
 
Jig_Saw said:
They worked fine for Hillary. They said she would win by 4%. She won by 2%. That’s within the margin of error.

That’s like saying that Trump’s 36%-56% approval/disapproval poll is really 37%/55%. Maybe it is, but he is still quite unpopular.
Click to expand...
She won? :confused:
 
7_Sorrows said:
I think Reagan would respect he was twice elected President of Russia. You are right,
things are different now since the Soviet Union no longer exists. Reagan would respect
Putin as a world leader who also has battled terrorism. Reagan would not be naive, but
he would see Putin as intelligent and would want to work on maintaining good relations with him as did George W. Bush who invited him to his Texas ranch.
Click to expand...
Sure he would. I mean, the Russians have been bastions of free democracy for decades now. There aren’t political based assassinations; Putin clearly acts like a democratic leader and doesn’t play any of the geo-political games that his predecessors did in the old Soviet Union.

Party first; even if it means paying homages to our foreign enemies.
 
Jig_Saw said:
They worked fine for Hillary. They said she would win by 4%. She won by 2%. That’s within the margin of error.

That’s like saying that Trump’s 36%-56% approval/disapproval poll is really 37%/55%. Maybe it is, but he is still quite unpopular.
Click to expand...
The polls and pundits were dead wrong on the electoral college vote, which is the one that counts. You are spinning here by focusing only on the popular vote.
 
Jig_Saw said:
Oh, I think we can infer that Reagan would not be a fan of Putin. I think anyone arguing otherwise doesn’t remember Reagan or studied him carefully.

Yes, the problem with Trump’s governing is that the democrats are creating chaos. Again, the alternative reality. The Republicans control both houses of Congress and the White House. They can do whatever they want. The fact that they can’t get anything done speaks more to the chaos created by Trump and the inability of Republicans to govern.

I’m not a Democrat. I did admire a lot of Reagan because he had core beliefs. I don’t see a lot of core beliefs from Republicans anymore. Haven’t for a long time. Sad.
Click to expand...
you’re right, the democrats have been calm about accepting their losses and them and the media have given Trump the opportunity to succeed. I’m sure you know what a dead president would feel about a current world leader and I’m sure you’re not a democrat. And, we’ll never get old and never die.
 
In a recent news story, Somalia was a world leading democracy for skilled Syrian refugees. A dentist seemed to be very pleased there. That’s supply and demand for you, even someplace dangerous, if you give them what they need with your best skillset where they are lacking, more people want you alive than dead.

Link: bbc.com/news/world-africa-38449941
 
Jig_Saw said:
Not really getting the idea of statistics, are you?
Click to expand...
I think we’ve found the problem. You claim Hillary won and she didn’t. Please tell your friends and maybe once they understand that, they will calm down. Again, Hillary lost.

btw, those polls that you claim are accurate are done in each state. They were wrong about the democrats that flipped in the rust belt. Otherwise, she might have skipped a Hollywood dinner or two and campaigned there.
 
meltzerboy said:
I thought for a moment these letters represented a new version of sexual identity categories.
Click to expand...
What an awesome idea. Have a random generator spit out 6 letters everyday and try to define your sexuality by it.
 
Jig_Saw said:
Wow. Someone has a really warped view of Reagan. He was America first all the way. He would not see the wisdom in a Russian dictator. Sad.
Click to expand...
Because back then they were Soviet Dictators! Until he wiped them out!
 
Jig_Saw said:
They worked fine for Hillary. They said she would win by 4%. She won by 2%. That’s within the margin of error.

That’s like saying that Trump’s 36%-56% approval/disapproval poll is really 37%/55%. Maybe it is, but he is still quite unpopular.
Click to expand...
No she didn’t win.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top