J
Jeanne_S
Guest
Suprise suprise…not!I thought it was supposed to be Russia and Mr. Putin who were meddling in the US elections? But it looks like it was Hillary’s campaign all along playing dirty tricks to make Mr. Trump look bad.
Suprise suprise…not!I thought it was supposed to be Russia and Mr. Putin who were meddling in the US elections? But it looks like it was Hillary’s campaign all along playing dirty tricks to make Mr. Trump look bad.
But people use it to say way more than is actually in it.I would suggest that you do view the video I linked to in post #408. The Project Veritas video has been corroborated in a number of ways.
Whether the law will be enforced or not, people will increasingly adopt the “notion” that lawbreaking is just fine, the only question being whether one is likely to get away with it or not.I can’t vote for a felon. True, Hillary hasn’t been charged with any of it but it seems the administration and FBI are protecting her.
I don’t want a country who has one justice system for some higher ups and another justice system for the rest of the country.![]()
Is this another example of your psychological experiment to find out how often people will accept unsubstantiated claims without asking for the citations?I would suggest that you do view the video I linked to in post #408. The Project Veritas video has been corroborated in a number of ways…
Nobody is disputing the claim!!!Must be true. Another example of Democrats rigging the election.Is this another example of your psychological experiment to find out how often people will accept unsubstantiated claims without asking for the citations?
First, this is the classic “argument from silence”. Second, I am not disputing the claim either. If you look at Peter Plato’s earlier posts where he omitted any references to a claim, Peter said he was conducting a psychological experiment, so I was just asking to see how his experiment is going. Third, there is more than just one claim involved in the referenced tape. There are many. Some may be true and some may be false. It is imprecise to lump them into one single claim. Fourth, even if all the claims are true, they do not amount to “rigging the election”. Dirty tricks in campaigning have been around forever. The term “rigging” is usually reserved for corruption of the voting process itself, such as tampering with voting machines, or voting illegally, or preventing votes from counting. It is fashionable today to call anything and everything “rigging”. But words do have proper meanings, so it would be best to use them, unless your intent is to deceive.Nobody is disputing the claim!!!Must be true. Another example of Democrats rigging the election.
I believe that bussing people around to vote multiple times qualifies as “rigging”First, this is the classic “argument from silence”. Second, I am not disputing the claim either. If you look at Peter Plato’s earlier posts where he omitted any references to a claim, Peter said he was conducting a psychological experiment, so I was just asking to see how his experiment is going. Third, there is more than just one claim involved in the referenced tape. There are many. Some may be true and some may be false. It is imprecise to lump them into one single claim. Fourth, even if all the claims are true, they do not amount to “rigging the election”. Dirty tricks in campaigning have been around forever. The term “rigging” is usually reserved for corruption of the voting process itself, such as tampering with voting machines, or voting illegally, or preventing votes from counting. It is fashionable today to call anything and everything “rigging”. But words do have proper meanings, so it would be best to use them, unless your intent is to deceive.
[Didn’t both Adams AND Jefferson hire Madison to write their campaign advertisements? In other words, Madison was attacking himself … and then defending himself … and then re-attacking. Maybe my memory is faulty. ]Nasty seems pretty tame compared to some attacks from Washington and Jefferson’s era:
Jefferson’s campaign attacked Adams as “a hideous hermaphroditical character with neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.”
Adams campaign shot back calling Jefferson “a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father.”
Please excuse me if I don’t think calling someone nasty is a big deal.
Hillary was trying to make Putin look like the “bad guy”.I thought it was supposed to be Russia and Mr. Putin who were meddling in the US elections? But it looks like it was Hillary’s campaign all along playing dirty tricks to make Mr. Trump look bad.
A soccer coach in Texas was arrested after he was accused of sexually abused eight of his players — boys between 10 and 15.
Police say more players are likely to come forward.
Marcos Ramos, **an undocumented immigrant **living in Corsicana, Texas, is also is wanted in his native Guatemala for sexually assaulting children, police said. He faces three counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and five counts of indecency with a child.
Investigators say he has been fooling people for years, finding work under assumed names. U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement has placed an immigration hold on Ramos, Fox4 Dallas reported.
It is just sad …Police said Ramos fled Central America and entered the U.S. illegally, first settling in Houston, where he coached a boys’ soccer team.
Spy vs Spy vs Spy.Hillary was trying to make Putin look like the “bad guy”.
And it was her all along.
It fits with the proven Clinton’s profile 100%Perhaps you care to explain how several of the individuals and planned disruptive activities which appear in the Project Veritas videos are also corroborated by the Wikileaks emails and by independent MSM news footage taken in Chicago and elsewhere prior to Trump rallies?
youtu.be/-R7A3Qz60tQ
If you mean “so much for the report…” because the Clinton campaign, the WH, and the news media have colluded to bury the story and threaten James O’Keefe, then you may be correct that we likely won’t hear much more about it – but that wouldn’t be because the videos have been proven false.
Well. Actually. Kind of.Bill Clinton is running for office?
Which office?Well. Actually. Kind of.
First GentlemanWhich office?
Look, I won’t be voting for Hillary Clinton either (or Donald Trump).This is really sickening. Bill Clinton having all kinds of women in Arkansas as Governor, running drugs and people disappearing if they get information on them.
These two guys (Bill and Donald) were pretty good friends. They pretty much know about each other, I would think. But Bill isn’t running.For those who think what Trump said about a woman ten years ago was bad then what do you think of Bill having Arkansas police officers taking phone numbers of women and Clinton asking them what they would like to do with those women?