Trump declares war on establishment Republicans

[felsguy]

If every conservative who is not voting for Trump would have all of their sins publicly exposed they would be nothing more than the worst hypocrites, much like the religious pharisees whom Christ excoriated and exposed. Repeat after me:

“I confess to Almighty God, and to you my brothers and sisters, that I have greatly sinned through my own fault, in my thoughts, in my words, in what I have done and what I have failed to do…”]

So then when these folks die, will they still have to undergo a judgment or will this one suffice?

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

I’m sorry but this is simply untrue. I understand that more than a handful of folks want Mr. Trump to lead the most powerful nation in the world, but not once during the entire GE have the polls, taken together, indicated that this would happen.

And today, he is further down in the polls than he has ever been.

Polls fluctuate from day to day, and in most Trump and Clinton are tied within the margin of error. Too many things can happen between now and Nov. 8 that could fluctuate these polls, most of which are probably biased toward Clinton. Look at Brexit, all the polls predicted Nay, but in the end it was a resounding Yay.

 

[YADA]

Does he just not get that if he keeps this up, if by some chance he’s elected (I seriously doubt it, but you never know)…then he’s just killed the chance of having any allies in Congress willing to work with him?

Isn’t the reverse true as well … they - the Establishment - withheld support [many 100% even endorsing Hilary] - gave grudging support - and wishy washy support, then denounced and withdrew their support … Doesn’t Congress have to also work with the Executive Branch - don’t they need the White House?

I don’t think Trump had a #neverRepublicanCongressman or a #neverRepublicanSenator campaign …

Which Democrat running for Senate or Congress has Trump endorsed over a Republican?

It was the Party elite that wanted Trump to sign the agreement to support whomever the nominee was and yet from the get go - some of the Elite immediately said they would never support Trump and they have not …

I was not a Trump supporter - and wanted a different candidate … However, I am one of those conservatives that have felt used by the Party having sent people to Congress on promises only to have them cave in to the other side and vote exactly opposite … I have supported candidates I did not care for … and was told it was necessary for party unity and to push our agenda … I think the Elite caused the rise of Trump [and the Tea Party] …

Trump is the nominee - they should get behind him or the party is finished … We will be fractured with minor party candidates splitting votes for years and the Democrats will flourish but America will not

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

So then when these folks die, will they still have to undergo a judgment or will this one suffice?

the harshest judgment will probably be for hypocrites, who are sinners like everyone else.

 

[YADA]

Um, so you’re saying the vast majority of Americans disagree with conservatives, but they think they’re right and you agree with them. Just as conservatives 60 years ago were opposed to desegregation?

Are you implying segregation was good?

No … what she said was that the Majority [and they were Democrats by the way] favored segregation … which was wrong … just because a majority of Americans might think - oh … killing innocent unborn babies is socially just [as some posters here on CAF assert] and even if the Supreme Court agrees does not make abortion right, good, or moral …

In fact if 100% of the people think it is okay that would not change the fact that it is an immoral intrinsic evil

 

[BellsMom]

Here’s a life lesson for Mr. Trump. Don’t spend 12 months calling the people you want to endorse and support you weak, lazy, stupid loosers and traitors.

You’re welcome.

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

Here’s a life lesson for Mr. Trump. Don’t spend 12 months calling the people you want to endorse and support you weak, lazy, stupid loosers and traitors.

You’re welcome.

At least Mr. Trump is saying the truth about most politicians.

 

[sallybutler]

At least Mr. Trump is saying the truth about most politicians.

I’m sorry, but 99.9999999% of politicians are not traitors, are not lazy, are not losers, and are not weak. Just because in their love for their country causes them to reach a different conclusion than you would reach or what I would reach does not give us the right to disparage their motives.

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

I’m sorry, but 99.9999999% of politicians are not traitors, are not lazy, are not losers, and are not weak. Just because in their love for their country causes them to reach a different conclusion than you would reach or what I would reach does not give us the right to disparage their motives.

I didn’t say 99.99; I said most. Most would be 51%+ . This especially among career politicians who become multi-millionaires “serving the people”. Two-faced liars. Term limits would probably solve lots of this.

 

[Little_Sheep]

I’m sorry, but 99.9999999% of politicians are not traitors, are not lazy, are not losers, and are not weak. Just because in their love for their country causes them to reach a different conclusion than you would reach or what I would reach does not give us the right to disparage their motives.

I have a lot of respect for our public servants on both sides of the aisle. No piece of me understands that “burn it all down” mentality that gave us Mr. Trump.

 

[BellsMom]

At least Mr. Trump is saying the truth about most politicians.

So why is he loosing it on twitter? Why does he want support from these people he loathes? Could it be that doesn’t really believe a thing he’s said during this campaign and is just feeding red meat to the base? He’s called himself an opportunist in two of his books. When someone tells you who they are…

 

[Little_Sheep]

Polls fluctuate from day to day, and in most Trump and Clinton are tied within the margin of error. Too many things can happen between now and Nov. 8 that could fluctuate these polls, most of which are probably biased toward Clinton. Look at Brexit, all the polls predicted Nay, but in the end it was a resounding Yay.

I respect your right to believe as you will, but hope you aren’t stunned in November.

 

[ManOnFire]

The American voters wanted a non-politician … and they got him … Donald Trump.

Establishment politicians are totally p*ssed off because he is not one of theirs.

Their previous selections, Romney, McCain, Dole and etc were complete flops.

But the establishment politicians were perfectly happy with those.

They do not want to win.

The establishment politicians were also unhappy with Reagan and maligned him at every opportunity.

Years after he died, they found a box of papers in his attic … drafts of the various essays he wrote. They were shocked. He did his own work.

Who knew.

The establishment politicians merely want their cozy relationships and legal clients for their lobby firms.

They are, for example, fearful that Trump may actually turn education back over to the states and localities and actually foster charter schools.

Yep.

 

[sallybutler]

I didn’t say 99.99; I said most. Most would be 51%+ . This especially among career politicians who become multi-millionaires “serving the people”. Two-faced liars. Term limits would probably solve lots of this.

I disagree with the term ‘most’, especially when it comes to the term ‘traitor’.

And as for becoming multi-millionaires, obviously not lazy (ok, I am being a little snarky with this sentence only).

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

I have a lot of respect for our public servants on both sides of the aisle. No piece of me understands that “burn it all down” mentality that gave us Mr. Trump.

ok. The national debt tripled over the past 8 years with Republicans in control of the House; terrorism on our shores, economy about to collapse; Gay Marriage forced on the Land, Obama Care un-opposed, our borders a mess, our cities on fire, corruption at the highest levels, and our freedoms evaporating, and the Supreme Court about to be governed by leftist radicals; Washington needs a political earthquake and an unconventional leader to turn things around. Wake up America

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

So why is he loosing it on twitter? Why does he want support from these people he loathes? Could it be that doesn’t really believe a thing he’s said during this campaign and is just feeding red meat to the base? He’s called himself an opportunist in two of his books. When someone tells you who they are…

It’s not so much a vote for Trump the man but rather a vote against the leftist radicals led by Hillary Clinton. The Supreme Court alone is a reason to support Trump. I don’t get it; here we have Hillary Clinton a corrupt liar who wants open borders, will raise taxes and continue the direction of the past 8 years. And here you’re worried about what he said in a book or in private? And taking advantage of good opportunities is the hallmark of entrepreneurship. What context was he speaking of? And ask yourself, is there anything you have said or done 10 years ago that you are ashamed of? IF so, how can you then stand over Mr. Trump and condemn him?

 

[zab]

It’s not so much a vote for Trump the man but rather a vote against the leftist radicals led by Hillary Clinton. The Supreme Court alone is a reason to support Trump. I don’t get it; here we have Hillary Clinton a corrupt liar who wants open borders, will raise taxes and continue the direction of the past 8 years. And here you’re worried about what he said in a book or in private? And taking advantage of good opportunities is the hallmark of entrepreneurship. What context was he speaking of? And ask yourself, is there anything you have said or done 10 years ago that you are ashamed of? IF so, how can you then stand over Mr. Trump and condemn him?

She did not condemn Trump, so don’t put words in her mouth or make false accusations. We are able to make an assumption of what kind of person is running for office and if they can be trusted- is that not what you are doing regarding Hillary Clinton?

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

She did not condemn Trump, so don’t put words in her mouth or make false accusations. We are able to make an assumption of what kind of person is running for office and if they can be trusted- is that not what you are doing regarding Hillary Clinton?

It’s not the person but rather the political agendas and designs over this country that are at stake. Pro-Death, Pro-Sodomy, Pro Globalism, forces about to fundamentally deconstruct our institutions and swallow up your religious freedoms, not to mention your taxes. Stop looking at the person’s sins and begin looking at their designs on the country.

 

[zab]

It’s not the person but rather the political agendas and designs over this country that are at stake. Pro-Death, Pro-Sodomy, Pro Globalism, forces about to fundamentally deconstruct our institutions and swallow up your religious freedoms, not to mention your taxes. Stop looking at the person’s sins and begin looking at their designs on the country.

Stop making accusations against about other voters.

 

[Gabriel_Serafin]

Stop making accusations against about other voters.

No accusations, simply suggestions and observations. One does not want to be stupid and let their country be taken over by militant abortionists filling our Supreme Court that will control the direction of this country the next 30 years.