S
Sojourner003
Guest
Weeks? More like until the end of time.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
P
ProVobis
Guest
I suspect his supporters have already found vindication of some type.If Trump comes out clean after all of this, he will be massively vindicated. He’d go on for weeks about it.
S
Sojourner003
Guest
It’s only a matter of time before the Fox talking points kick in. They seem to be off their game lately.I suspect his supporters have already found vindication of some type.
A
AFerri48
Guest
Next week Junior, Manafort, and Kushner are all testifying so we’ll see what comes of that.
D
dvdjs
Guest
Destroying subpoenaed evidence? What are you going on about now?As is destroying evidence that was subpoenaed.
J
josie_L
Guest
I read quite a lot of news outlets (from left to right), except the NYT and LA TIMES, and as of late the Washington Post, so I’m pretty sure I’m getting out of my comfort zone more often than you are.You need to get out of your comfort zone and read more than the Washington Times. And, BTW, it is not beyond his scope according to his contract.
Why don’t you try getting out of your comfort zone, and read the Washington Examiner, Washington Times, Forbes, Business Insider, Breitbart, American Thinker . . .etc.?
J
josie_L
Guest
I don’t recall.Destroying subpoenaed evidence? What are you going on about now?
J
Jig_Saw
Guest
I think we all know that President Reagan was suffering from Alzheimer’s and really didn’t remember.I don’t recall.
A
AFerri48
Guest
Where did that come from?I think we all know that President Reagan was suffering from Alzheimer’s and really didn’t remember.
J
josie_L
Guest
No, I really can’t recall, getting old like Hillary.I think we all know that President Reagan was suffering from Alzheimer’s and really didn’t remember.
S
Sojourner003
Guest
I do check out of few of those, but not Brietbart. It makes me feel dirty with all the anti-Semitic innuendo. American Thinker? never heard of it.I read quite a lot of news outlets (from left to right), except the NYT and LA TIMES, and as of late the Washington Post, so I’m pretty sure I’m getting out of my comfort zone more often than you are.
Why don’t you try getting out of your comfort zone, and read the Washington Examiner, Washington Times, Forbes, Business Insider, Breitbart, American Thinker . . .etc.?
J
josie_L
Guest
Then please do not make assumptions of what I read, because I read a heck of a lot of material, and in fact, I quoted quite a few of them in previous threads (the Guardian, the Daily Caller, the Hill, Real Clear Politics. . . etc.).I do check out of few of those, but not Brietbart. It makes me feel dirty with all the anti-Semitic innuendo. American Thinker? never heard of it.
p.s. What anti-Semitism is there on Breitbart? I read articles there and I have never encountered such anti-Semitic innuendo (the founder, Andrew Breitbart was a Jew, Ben Shapiro who became editor at large was also a Jew, and Milo Yannoupoulos who as of January of this year, was the editor at large was also part Jew). Am I missing something here?
S
Sojourner003
Guest
I did encounter such and I know it when I see it. Maybe we visited on different days. But I’m sure the mood prevails since so many white nationalist post there.Then please do not make assumptions of what I read, because I read a heck of a lot of material, and in fact, I quoted quite a few of them in previous threads (the Guardian, the Daily Caller, the Hill, Real Clear Politics. . . etc.).
p.s. What anti-Semitism is there on Breitbart? I read articles there and I have never encountered such anti-Semitic innuendo (the founder, Andrew Breitbart was a Jew, Ben Shapiro who became editor at large was also a Jew, and Milo Yannoupoulos who as of January of this year, was the editor at large was also part Jew). Am I missing something here?
J
josie_L
Guest
Whatever you encountered was an anomaly, can’t seem to believe it though (like I said most of the major players at Breitbart were Jewish).I did encounter such and I know it when I see it. Maybe we visited on different days. But I’m sure the mood prevails since so many white nationalist post there.
p.s. Are you referring to the comments or the articles? Because if it’s the comments, then I can imagine there being hateful comments, I’ve read some already.
S
Sojourner003
Guest
No, I put comments into a separate category. It was the stories. Now they appear to be homophobic, too. The comments are quite nasty, as you mentioned.Whatever you encountered was an anomaly, can’t seem to believe it though (like I said most of the major players at Breitbart were Jewish).
p.s. Are you referring to the comments or the articles? Because if it’s the comments, then I can imagine there being hateful comments, I’ve read some already.
7
7_Sorrows
Guest
+1. Yes, they are in high gear now. Why weren’t limits set on the scope of theI’m starting to think that Mueller hasn’t found anything of interest regarding the election collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, so he’s venturing into his business transactions/dealings, even though that clearly goes beyond the mandate of the stated investigation.
Forget witch hunt, this is an inquisition.
investigation? When you have lawyers lined up who were Clinton donors, how
unbiased is your investigation going to be?
7
7_Sorrows
Guest
I read Breitbart also and have never come across antisemitic material.Then please do not make assumptions of what I read, because I read a heck of a lot of material, and in fact, I quoted quite a few of them in previous threads (the Guardian, the Daily Caller, the Hill, Real Clear Politics. . . etc.).
p.s. What anti-Semitism is there on Breitbart? I read articles there and I have never encountered such anti-Semitic innuendo (the founder, Andrew Breitbart was a Jew, Ben Shapiro who became editor at large was also a Jew, and Milo Yannoupoulos who as of January of this year, was the editor at large was also part Jew). Am I missing something here?
They have to find a way to smear Breitbart and discredit Breitbart as a legitimate
news source.
E
EasterJoy
Guest
If Mr. Sessions somehow failed to belabor this obvious point with the President, I wouldn’t blame him. He has to be about ready to let Mr. Donald Trump have enough political rope to hang himself with, plus a little extra to ensure a good long drop. Just making threatening kinds of noises anywhere in the general direction of the special prosecutor is a very bad idea right now. Donald Trump ought to be spouting, “I’m sure they’ll be finished soon, I am not worried, we have nothing to hide, this will all be cleared up soon” as if his life depended on it.Why do I have a feeling that Trump’s about to do something extremely stupid, such as firing Mueller? The guy is handling the Russia probe so poorly, it’s ridiculous.
The number of people willing to take political bullets for Mr. Trump is going to be down to the immediate family, pretty soon, and I’m not so sure I’d bet the farm on Mr. Kushner.
I hope he’s not making life as hard on the residence staff and the Secret Service as he is on the West Wing people who have desk jobs.
Considering that the Clintons didn’t exactly enjoy the Starr investigation into matters that happened well before* they* got into the White House, I don’t expect Democratic sympathies will be too much aroused.+1. Yes, they are in high gear now. Why weren’t limits set on the scope of the investigation? When you have lawyers lined up who were Clinton donors, how unbiased is your investigation going to be?
Come to think of it, considering the number of members of GOP Congress that Mr. Trump has flippantly insulted as liars and swamp creatures and worse, there may even be a bit of schadenfreude on the “friendly” side of the aisle, too. You don’t make enemies inside the Beltway every chance you get without it coming back to bite you. There has to be a bit of a temptation to let Mr. Trump learn the hard way all the things that his money *won’t *buy in Washington, DC.
Dunno…seems like there was redress when Nixon had it done.Destroying subpoenaed evidence? What are you going on about now?
This story is unfolding like a badly-written tragedy. Lots of hubris, but admiration for the tragic hero is not going to be enough to supply much pathos if he falls and Mr. Pence takes his place.
Mr. Trump needs to quit watching cable news and get himself a dog.
S
Sy_Noe
Guest
I’m starting to think that Mueller hasn’t found anything of interest regarding the election collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, so he’s venturing into his business transactions/dealings, even though that clearly goes beyond the mandate of the stated investigation.
Forget witch hunt, this is an inquisition.
I honestly don’t know. Apparently Manafort is being investigated for money laundering now as well.
Is he even looking at Russia anymore?
Actually Mueller is to look into any matters that arise or may arise from the investigation. That includes having the authority to subpoena, say, the president’s tax records.+1. Yes, they are in high gear now. Why weren’t limits set on the scope of the investigation?
cbsnews.com/news/the-powers-and-limits-of-robert-muellers-new-job-as-special-counsel/
factcheck.org/2017/05/special-counsel-qa/
G
Ghosty
Guest
Unless a blue dress was involved in questionable realestate dealings, this is actually rather restrained.That seems a bit odd. Is there any precedent for this?
The investigation is into Russian involvement in the election, and Russian business dealings with the Trump organization would certainly need to be examined in order to properly ensure a thorough investigation under a moderately broad reading of this mandate.
Honestly, I’m not even a little bit perturbed by this development. I hope that all business ties are examined.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.