Trump-Mueller tensions escalate

  • Thread starter Thread starter AFerri48
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
sallybutler said:
Only through soft power (aka talking to friends and family).

Now as to which party they would favor, it really depends on what is going on at the time. Just like most other population groups, their opinions are probably all over the board.
Click to expand...
Bull, the fact is illegal immigrants will change the demographics in America in the near future and that change will favour the Democrats (as per the voting trends), and that is why the Democrats don’t mind and care to change the situation.
 
Joyful_Song said:
Breitbart has proven to be the leader in false news and out right lies. How sad that so many here put party solely above God and country. This “us against them” mentality is not sustainable. I pray the rosary every day for our country and its leaders.
Click to expand...
Hogwash, you’ve probably never even read enough articles to surmise this. And stop sermonizing and preaching to people who love their country just as much as you do.
 
josie_L said:
Bull, the fact is illegal immigrants will change the demographics in America in the near future and that change will favour the Democrats (as per the voting trends), and that is why the Democrats don’t mind and care to change the situation.
Click to expand...
Don’t kid yourself. Trump just issued 15,000 extra visas so that the need for seasonal workers be fulfilled. What makes you think he wouldn’t extend amnesties to illegals to gain advantage? I believe Reagan and Bush thought about it.
 
josie_L said:
Bull, the fact is illegal immigrants will change the demographics in America in the near future and that change will favour the Democrats (as per the voting trends), and that is why the Democrats don’t mind and care to change the situation.
Click to expand...
The Republican party should do more to appeal to non-white voters if a demographic change is going to harm them.
 
lmachine said:
How many is “too many” and how many do you believe have voted?
Click to expand...
Read and enjoy:

washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/30/illegals-in-virginia-registered-vote-in-elections/

investors.com/politics/editorials/illegals-did-vote-in-november-and-trump-is-right-to-investigate/

And my favourite, an article from the Daily Wire siting an article by the Washington Post siting a study:
In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races. …
Click to expand...
How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.
Click to expand...
Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.
Click to expand...
It is a fascinating study based on something called “self-reporting,” which means that non-citizens admitted to voting illegally. And the study was conducted by…
Click to expand...
Jesse Richman is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Director of the ODU Social Science Research Center. David Earnest is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in the College of Arts and Letters.
Click to expand...
dailywire.com/news/12760/flashback-wapo-publishes-study-claims-millions-john-nolte#
Click to expand...
 
lmachine said:
The Republican party should do more to appeal to non-white voters if a demographic change is going to harm them.
Click to expand...
That’s not the point, Democrats don’t favour FOLLOWING THE LAWS on IMMIGRATION because it suits their purposes. They don’t want to build a wall or secure the border (that would deny them many potential voters), so illegal immigrants are, in other words, their bread and butter.
 
josie_L said:
So you’re supportive of an investigation based on allegations, with no substantive evidence of any kind to support said allegation? But you’re hoping said investigation supports said allegation (Russia/Trump collusion of election hacking), even though it’s been months that we’ve been investigating this. And now, we have to increase the scope of the investigation, again, because of this allegation, wherein evidence as yet to be produced? Is this how the justice system works in your country, “GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT”?
Click to expand...
I have seen EasterJoy and Jig_Saw explain it to you on this thread and another so there is no sense in me repeating what they said if you haven’t already grasped what they explaned about the situation.
 
josie_L said:
That’s not the point, Democrats don’t favour FOLLOWING THE LAWS on IMMIGRATION because it suits their purposes. They don’t want to build a wall or secure the border (that would deny them many potential voters), so illegal immigrants are, in other words, their bread and butter.
Click to expand...
Since there are hordes of undocumented immigrants deciding our national elections it would be smart for Republicans to try to appeal more to them
 
7_Sorrows said:
As long as there is a double standard.
Click to expand...
Yes everyone who wants to talk about investigating someone who never was nor who will ever be President, are the same ones who oppose the current President being investigated. Funny and strange how that works.
 
Sy_Noe said:
I have seen EasterJoy and Jig_Saw explain it to you on this thread and another so there is no sense in me repeating what they said if you haven’t already grasped what they explaned about the situation.
Click to expand...
They haven’t explained anything that even remotely answers my questions concisely and adequately, i.e. , there is no evidence other than suspicion and one failed meeting (which we only knew after said investigations started) that warrants having this investigation? Such investigations based on allegations with unsupported evidence are nothing more than witch hunts!

Moreover, it was the very flawed and unverified Steele dossier that first claimed a Russia/Trump collusion, which was then forwarded by Fusion GPS to the media and Democrats who promulgated it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top