Trump Thread Two

  • Thread starter Thread starter XndrK
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like the NY Post got ahold of Pictures from Mrs. Trump’s days as a porn model. They actually ran a censored picture of her modeling nude on their front page :eek:
And these weren’t “tasteful” nudes, this was porn in a porn magazine. They were apparently taken in the mid 90’s.

Still between that and Donald’s connections with Playboy it sure seems like their family has no issues with the porn industry. Nevermind divorce and remarriage.
 
He married Melania in the Episcopal Church
True, but that doesn’t mean they’re Episcopalian. One party need only be a baptized Christian to be married at my parish. And of course provide a divorce decree if previously married.
 
And Bill’s connections with Jeffrey Epstein? Maybe one could say that the Clinton family has no issues with what Epstein was convicted of.
Trump doesn’t just have connections with Playboy, he’s been in Playboy. In fact he has the issue he was in quite prominently featured in his office.
 
Trump doesn’t just have connections with Playboy, he’s been in Playboy. In fact he has the issue he was in quite prominently featured in his office.
And Bill Clinton has jetted around with Jeffrey Epstein. Wonder why he wanted to keep it secret?

Jimmy Carter was also interviewed for Playboy. Does that mean he has porn connections?
 
Regarding Trump’s despicable attacks on the Khan family, John McCain said:

“In recent days, Donald Trump disparaged a fallen soldier’s parents. He has suggested that the likes of their son should not be allowed in the United States — to say nothing of entering its service. I cannot emphasize enough how deeply I disagree with Mr. Trump’s statement,” McCain said. “I hope Americans understand that the remarks do not represent the views of our Republican Party, its officers, or candidates.”
 
You forgot to include YOUR HUGE DOUBLE STANDARD.
Actually, no.

I say, consistently: even if the Episocopal church teaches adultery and abortion are permissible, they are wrong.

You are saying that Trump’s adultery is permissible because his church says it’s ok.
But that abortion is not permissible even if his church says it’s ok.

For me to have a double standard you would need to show where I said that adultery is wrong even if his church says it’s wrong, but abortion is permissible since his church says it’s permissible.

See?
Abortion is murder, but it’s ok to vote for someone who believes in abortion on demand and will fight to do everything in their power to keep it legal because you don’t like the other guy. Therefore, abortion is ok.
Are you talking about Trump? Voting for him since he believes in abortion on demand and will fight to do everything in his power to keep it legal?

Remember, he has said that he would keep abortion legal.

(But, I suppose, you can say that since his church believes it to be permissible, this is fine?)

Be consistent, Denise, ok?
 
And Bill Clinton has jetted around with Jeffrey Epstein. Wonder why he wanted to keep it secret?

Jimmy Carter was also interviewed for Playboy. Does that mean he has porn connections?
Actually it does mean Carter had porn connections. But then he didn’t marry a porn model either 😉
 
Actually it does mean Carter had porn connections. But then he didn’t marry a porn model either 😉
And Hillary Clinton married someone who hangs around with pedophiles, is an accused rapist, and is a serial adulterer. 😉
 
Actually, no.

Are you talking about Trump? Voting for him since he believes in abortion on demand and will fight to do everything in his power to keep it legal?
No, I’m actually talking about Hillary Clinton, your candidate. Will she nominate pro-life justices to the Supreme Court?
 
😃

Neither will Trump.

If you believe that he will, you can invest in his Trump Airlines, See how much trusting in his word will work for you.
And you can donate to the Clinton Foundation. They have such a fantastic record of putting donations to good use 😃
 
He married Melania in the Episcopal Church
Trump had his wedding in one Episcopal church in Florida. That does not make him Episcopalian. Many parishes rent out their church buildings for weddings.

He is nominally Presbyterian, although I remember reading that he does not have membership in any specific parish church. If anything, his roots go back to Riverside Church in NYC, which is interdenominational.
 
Trump had his wedding in one Episcopal church in Florida. That does not make him Episcopalian. Many parishes rent out their church buildings for weddings.

He is nominally Presbyterian, although I remember reading that he does not have membership in any specific parish church. If anything, his roots go back to Riverside Church in NYC, which is interdenominational.
I think the point that Denise is making is that since his religious affiliation (which is irrelevant–Presbyterian, Episcopalian, Zoroastrian…whatever), doesn’t teach that it’s adultery to marry after divorce, he’s not actually committing adultery.

Now, of course, it’s obvious to all of us here that this is a disingenuous position, given the fact that we know that the view will be upheld that abortion is grievously evil DESPITE what any church may teach about it.
 
The self righteousness in some posts here concerning Melania and the trump marriage is shocking. I thought the Vatican II spirit was supposed to fend that off.
 
I think the point that Denise is making is that since his religious affiliation (which is irrelevant–Presbyterian, Episcopalian, Zoroastrian…whatever), doesn’t teach that it’s adultery to marry after divorce, he’s not actually committing adultery.

Now, of course, it’s obvious to all of us here that this is a disingenuous position, given the fact that we know that the view will be upheld that abortion is grievously evil DESPITE what any church may teach about it.
Yet you’ll support a candidate who unequivocally believes a grievous evil should remain legal and will nominate Supreme Court justices to ensure it remains legal. Now who’s being disingenuous? Tend to the log in your own eye, PR.
 
This ^^ sounds, ironically, self righteous.
You can have the last word on this board. There is absolutely no sense continuing this conversation. But trump will have the last word by winning.
 
Yet you’ll support a candidate who unequivocally believes a grievous evil should remain legal and will nominate Supreme Court justices to ensure it remains legal. Now who’s being disingenuous? Tend to the log in your own eye, PR.
I will, because Trump will be no better for the unborn.

No better.

Not to mention he’s an adulterer. 😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top