F
FollowChrist34
Guest
Fair enough - just don’t try that with Trump…All I have is Rubio in his own words to go by.
Fair enough - just don’t try that with Trump…All I have is Rubio in his own words to go by.
I, too, saw the video and I don’t know how you can assume that Trump didn’t affirm punishment for women who procure abortions. There wasn’t any spin put on his comment – when asked if he agreed with this, he said yes. Directly. Matthews asked a question and after 5 minutes of deflection, Trump finally answered it.Having watched the video, I don’t think Trump really affirmed the “punish the woman who contracted the murder” position, Matthews wanted that answer and he “got” it. Then Trump posts his real opinion online and he “flip flopped”.
They’d need a supermajority in the senate, else the Dems could just filabuster.If Mr. Trump wins the presidency, then I would assume that the Republicans will hold both houses of Congress. They should be able to pass a law punishing women for abortions if they are truly a pro-life party.
Is there an official catholic church position on this specific issue? Whether women can or should be chastised/punished for seeking illegal abortion?I, too, saw the video and I don’t know how you can assume that Trump didn’t affirm punishment for women who procure abortions. There wasn’t any spin put on his comment – when asked if he agreed with this, he said yes. Directly. Matthews asked a question and after 5 minutes of deflection, Trump finally answered it.
I doubt it, too.I hope you are right but I doubt it.
He did affirm punishment for women who procure abortions in the Town Hall meeting, but he later said he didn’t mean it.I, too, saw the video and I don’t know how you can assume that Trump didn’t affirm punishment for women who procure abortions. There wasn’t any spin put on his comment – when asked if he agreed with this, he said yes. Directly. Matthews asked a question and after 5 minutes of deflection, Trump finally answered it.
This reminds me of deconstructionism, dada. It doesn’t matter what Trump says, right? The fact that he is spluttering and incoherent is the least of our worries. To the larger point: how can we possibly know what he would do in terms of policy in the White House if he doesn’t? How can one, within reason, actually know whether or not he/she agrees with Trump? It is impossible. The President is the most powerful man in the world.I, too, saw the video and I don’t know how you can assume that Trump didn’t affirm punishment for women who procure abortions. There wasn’t any spin put on his comment – when asked if he agreed with this, he said yes. Directly. Matthews asked a question and after 5 minutes of deflection, Trump finally answered it.
Carly Fiorina would sink Cruz’a ship just like Sarah Palin sunk McCain’s.
It was clearly a set up but that’s to be expected with the media. It also doesn’t matter what trump says; he’s bound to offend people no matter what he says, even if he doesn’t answer the question.This reminds me of deconstructionism, dada. It doesn’t matter what Trump says, right? The fact that he is spluttering and incoherent is the least of our worries. To the larger point: how can we possibly know what he would do in terms of policy in the White House if he doesn’t? How can one, within reason, actually know whether or not he/she agrees with Trump? It is impossible. The President is the most powerful man in the world.
Carson is now out there saying that Trump was not forewarned of Matthews’ abortion question - somehow it was not ‘fair.’ Trump was not allowed to prepare in advance.
Or know the answer.It was clearly a set up but that’s to be expected with the media. It also doesn’t matter what trump says; he’s bound to offend people no matter what he says, even if he doesn’t answer the question.
I found this to be common among business people.Or he could think about major social and political issues before sitting down to speak with journalists. That he hasn’t formulated a coherent position on abortion is…scary. Although perhaps no more scary than anything else he’s said…
But the treatment of women in 1922 and today is far different.Thank you for posting that.
“There is no documented case since 1922 in which a woman was even charged in an abortion in the United States.”
If that doesn’t get people’s attention, I don’t know what will.
Who knows the answer to the question? Who honestly thinks this is a settled issue on which no contention can be had?Or know the answer.
When Chris Matthews asked Bishop Tobin of Rhode Island the exact same question, the Bishop tried to dance around the question and then finally answered that he didn’t have the expertise in writing law to know what penalty should be included.Is there an official catholic church position on this specific issue? Whether women can or should be chastised/punished for seeking illegal abortion?
That makes sense. This is such a complex issue where discussions can and probably should be had.When Chris Matthews asked Bishop Tobin of Rhode Island the exact same question, the Bishop tried to dance around the question and then finally answered that he didn’t have the expertise in writing law to know what penalty should be included.
Jim
**Revisiting the controversies: **It’s a particularly apt moment to revisit the cases when Trump has either dramatically changed a controversial position in a short period of time or said something so contentious that condemnations from his own party came as fast and furious as they did yesterday. Here’s a list from an extensive sampling of Trump’s reversals and the comments that drew the most intra-party criticism.
**June 2015: On Mexican immigrants: **“They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists.”
GOP critics included: Marco Rubio, Rick Perry and Jeb Bush
Code:**July 2015: On John McCain:** "I like people who weren't captured." GOP critics included: Scott Walker, Marco Rubio and the Republican National Committee
Code:**August 2015: On Megyn Kelly:** "There was …. blood coming out of her, wherever." GOP critics included: Erick Erickson, Mike Huckabee, Carly Fiorina
Code:**August 2015: On health care:** "As far as single-payer, it works in Canada." (He's amended his positions on health care numerous times) GOP critics included Erick Erickson, Rick Perry, Reid Ribble
Code:**September 2016: On Carly Fiorina:** "Look at that face!" (He later said he was referring to Fiorina's "persona.") GOP critics included: Scott Walker, Jeb Bush
Code:**November 2015: On 9/11: **"Thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down." GOP critics included: George Pataki, Jeb Bush
Code:**December 2015:** **On Muslims: **Enact "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States." GOP critics included: Reince Priebus, Paul Ryan, Dick Cheney
Code:**February 2016**: **On David Duke's endorsement:** "I know nothing about David Duke." GOP critics included: Tim Scott, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan
Code:**February 2016: On waterboarding:** "Torture works." GOP critics included: Michael Hayden, Lindsey Graham
Code:**March 2016: On Muslims**: "I think Islam hates us." GOP critics included Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake
Code:**March 2016:** **On military leaders and torture**: "When I say they'll do as I tell them, they'll do as I tell them." (He later clarified to say he acknowledges international laws.) GOP critics included: A group of 70 Republican foreign policy experts who penned an open letter to Trump on the subject
Interesting and important informationCode:**March 2016:** **On women seeking an abortion:** "There has to be some form of punishment, yeah." (He changed his position within hours) GOP critics included: SBA List, March for Life, Ted Cruz
But the issue has to be thought through before deciding to run for national political office.That makes sense. This is such a complex issue where discussions can and probably should be had.
To try to judge trump for not having a definitive answer on the spot is simply not fair.
How can he have thought through this issue if the catholic church hasn’t even thought through it???But the issue has to be thought through before deciding to run for national political office.
There are issues which he seems weak on, and that is how laws are made and passed in the US Government.
He comes across as if the president is like a CEO who can fire people who don’t go along with his proposals.
Jim
Well, I do know what the GOP platform is on this issue. I do know what the conservative prolifers in Wisconsin believe on this issue. This puts me quite a bit ahead of Trump. Not that I am bragging. Every other GOP candidate and probably around 99% of the GOP voters are completely aware of the GOP position on this issue too.Who knows the answer to the question? Who honestly thinks this is a settled issue on which no contention can be had?
Maybe the pro-lifers you hang out with know beyond a shadow of doubt women should never be punished but I’m not so sure.
What can you possibly mean the Catholic Church hasn’t thought through this? Perhaps look at Evangelium Vitae the encyclical by St. Pope John Paul?How can he have thought through this issue if the catholic church hasn’t even thought through it???
He can’t make this decision by himself in real life. He can’t dictate what to do with a woman having an illegal abortion. The country has to decide that. The Church and the pro-life movement all have to contribute to the conversation.