Trump Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Bay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Heck, what will happen if he becomes president ?

Will we see more and more violent protests until we have a mini-civil war ?

Jim
A question for the Democrats…

As I don’t recall Hillary ever berating Sharpton for his contributions to peace.
 
Tactic of the Left is now to shut down rallies they don’t like. Wonder what would have happened if the Right shut down Obama rallies in 2008? Would that be OK? Or is it only OK to shut down rallies of the people the Left doesn’t like?

… I guess we need to ask a constitutional moralist here …

Sanders? Obama? Clinton? any of them speaking out against these actions?

Why not?
 
To crush opposition to what? There is nothing wrong with protesting as long as protesters aren’t violent.
I agree…the protesters do have the right to assembly. I don’t agree that they should infiltrate inside Trumps rallies…those are Trumps own private events. However I do support the right of people to PEACEFULLY assemble outside the events and protest. As it is their right to assembly
 
Imo, Trump is a lot more qualified than Obama was (or is) to be President…

Was talking about this the other day with a friend, who agreed with me that if Clinton was a Republican, the Dems would be complaining that we don’t want or need the spouse of an impeached President in office. Oh, and that SNL and Hollywood would predictably be all over it.

But there’s nary a peep out of them. Why? Because their rules only apply to everybody else.
 
Imo, Trump is a lot more qualified than Obama was (or is) to be President…

Was talking about this the other day with a friend, who agreed with me that if Clinton was a Republican, the Dems would be complaining that we don’t want or need the spouse of an impeached President in office. Oh, and that SNL and Hollywood would predictably be all over it.

But there’s nary a peep out of them. Why? Because their rules only apply to everybody else.
Pretty much…:mad:
 
We are still great in spite of that.
Then there’s the matter of ssm…

That said, if Jesus were to come back today, I’m confident He’d find more than one good man in the USA. Just not as many as He should, due to the indoctrination by the Godless religion of secularism to the masses (including our young) via EVERYONE’S tax $$$.
 
Then there’s the matter of ssm…

That said, if Jesus were to come back today, I’m confident He’d find more than one good man in the USA. Just not as many as He should, due to the indoctrination of the Godless religion of secularism to the masses (including our young) via EVERYONE’S tax $$$.
The subconscious influence of secularism within the public school system is a very powerful thing.
 
Imo, Trump is a lot more qualified than Obama was (or is) to be President…

Was talking about this the other day with a friend, who agreed with me that if Clinton was a Republican, the Dems would be complaining that we don’t want or need the spouse of an impeached President in office. Oh, and that SNL and Hollywood would predictably be all over it.

But there’s nary a peep out of them. Why? Because their rules only apply to everybody else.
Qualified how? Kasich has executive experience and a track record of saving unborn babies and working across the aisle. Trump was pro-abortion until last year, and his “pro-life” views simply extend to taxpayer funds - nothing about stopping the murder of unborn babies with private, non-taxpayer funds. So qualified how? Government isn’t a business.
 
Then there’s the matter of ssm…

That said, if Jesus were to come back today, I’m confident He’d find more than one good man in the USA. Just not as many as He should, due to the indoctrination by the Godless religion of secularism to the masses (including our young) via EVERYONE’S tax $$$.
And there’s also the matter of:

PRAY TO STOP THE LEGALI$ED EXECUTION OF BABIES

Which is, for all practical purposes:

PRAY TO STOP TAXPAYER FUNDS FROM GOING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD
 
Qualified how? Kasich has executive experience and a track record of saving unborn babies and working across the aisle. Trump was pro-abortion until last year, and his “pro-life” views simply extend to taxpayer funds - nothing about stopping the murder of unborn babies with private, non-taxpayer funds. So qualified how? Government isn’t a business.
Then by all means, vote for Kasich in the primaries!

However, if Trump is the candidate who ends up running, well…?
 
Imo, Trump is a lot more qualified than Obama was (or is) to be President…

Was talking about this the other day with a friend, who agreed with me that if Clinton was a Republican, the Dems would be complaining that we don’t want or need the spouse of an impeached President in office. Oh, and that SNL and Hollywood would predictably be all over it.

But there’s nary a peep out of them. Why? Because their rules only apply to everybody else.
I call that whining, no matter which side does it. I can cite cases from both parties where someone does not behave in a moral upstanding way, yet one side or the other gives them a pass. Does that make it right? No. But it does remind me of what Jesus said, remove the log from my eye before I complain about the splinter in your eye.
 
And there’s also the matter of:

PRAY TO STOP THE LEGALI$ED EXECUTION OF BABIES

Which is, for all practical purposes:

PRAY TO STOP TAXPAYER FUNDS FROM GOING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Absolutely!

Our tax dollars are supporting the indoctrination of Godlessness to the young…

Why should unfamily planning be recommended to the young and funded by taxpayer dollars? Businesses aren’t supposed to benefit from non-profit organizations. Who actually benefits from the young being educated in the WAYS OF THE WORLD??

It is NOT the place of adults to make such recommendations to the young that can endanger their physical, mental, emotional, financial, and spiritual well being. Perhaps permanently.
 
I call that whining, no matter which side does it. I can cite cases from both parties where someone does not behave in a moral upstanding way, yet one side or the other gives them a pass. Does that make it right? No. But it does remind me of what Jesus said, remove the log from my eye before I complain about the splinter in your eye.
Ergo I await Hillary’s berating of Sharpton’s body of work…

Instead of trying to wheedle votes out of him.
 
Megyn Kelly has been unfair to Trump from the very beginning. She has also helped the trump momentum, IMO. Many people have dropped fox on account of her.

Granted, Megyn Kelly has also weakened trump’s reputation among some especially women, but given the political climate I don’t think those people will like trump anyway even without Kelly’s efforts.

It cuts both ways with Megan Kelly, mainly because her unfair treatment of trump is much more subtle than other vicious attacks Trump has had to endure.
Her “unfair treatment” of Trump was an example of good journalism, being prepared to call him out on his lies, misogyny and general crudeness.
 
The subconscious influence of secularism within the public school system is a very powerful thing.
That frog’s been slowly boiling since the latter part of the last millennium…

I know young adults who have told when they reported being harassed, “Well, you DO know about birth control, don’t you?”

THIS is secularism’s legacy. Grooming the young in the ways of the world, and EVERYONE getting to pay for it! Sadly, many times in more ways than one…
 
And there’s also the matter of:

PRAY TO STOP THE LEGALI$ED EXECUTION OF BABIES

Which is, for all practical purposes:

PRAY TO STOP TAXPAYER FUNDS FROM GOING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Also, to stop taxpayer dollars from funding the indoctrination of secularism to the young…

Which reminds me of this, from Matthew 18:

“Woe to the world because of things that cause sin! Such things must come, but woe to the one through whom they come!” (NAB)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top