N
Nepperhan
Guest
Show me when he ever said anything like that! With Trump its always ‘us vs. them’.He wants people to unite as Americans, which is unifying within America.
Show me when he ever said anything like that! With Trump its always ‘us vs. them’.He wants people to unite as Americans, which is unifying within America.
Its nice to see the rich and privileged have some social awareness and attempt to make community improvements. You prefer mindless automatons? Would you go to a R. Kelly concert?Can’t we just watch a sports event without seeing a bunch of rich, privileged athletes virtue signal by kneeling during the national anthem?
It is divisive, not unifying. It is not an improvement. It is intentionally provocativeIts nice to see the rich and privileged have some social awareness and attempt to make community improvements.
… and maybe that’s just what this society needs. That sort of mirrors the bywords of the late John Lewis, God rest his soul.It is divisive, not unifying. It is not an improvement. It is intentionally provocative
I see. Trump tells the truth, but that’s not unifying, so he shouldn’t say it.and maybe that’s just what this society needs. That sort of mirrors the bywords of the late John Lewis, God rest his soul.
Trump actually told his opinions, not the truth. And what he said was not helpful to the deep divisions troubling this country, Remark on that.I see. Trump tells the truth, but that’s not unifying, so he shouldn’t say it.
What was not helpful was the intentional misrepresentation of what he said by the DNC media.Trump actually told his opinions, not the truth. And what he said was not helpful to the deep divisions troubling this country, Remark on that.
I don’t know if this is true or not. But as a responsible spokesman and statesman, Trump should have given a different talk. Most folks can understand that point.What was not helpful was the intentional misrepresentation of what he said by the DNC media.
No. It has nothing to do with what I say. The point is that unity in the United States will only happen under the founding principles, as stated above.You basically say that the only thing that can unify us ‘is for folks to agree with me’. That’s not unification of diverse peoples.
Where do you stand on these foundational points?•all of us are created equal, regardless of any immutable characteristic.
• that we must all have the same individual rights that exist outside the existence of government, many of which are enumerated in the constitution and Declaration.
•government exists primarily to protect the rights of the individual.
That’s the view of leftist intersectionality.Then maybe “diverse peoples” should not be unified.
The question is not whether we should be unified, but whether we can be. A divide exists, and has been worsened by BLM, Antifa, et al. We should not underestimate the extent or severity of the separation. We are seeing a clash of differing world views, and it is not immediately obvious that this chasm can be bridged.Then maybe “diverse peoples” should not be unified.
Intentionally worsened.The question is not whether we should be unified, but whether we can be. A divide exists, and has been worsened by BLM, Antifa, et al.
The key, in my view, is making sure we do not allow them to frame the nature of the division, which, with the help of the leftist media, they have been successful in doing. That is, a division by tribes.We should not underestimate the extent or severity of the separation. We are seeing a clash of differing world views, and it is not immediately obvious that this chasm can be bridged.
My view? The division is a minority of Americans. Most Americans, to one degree or another, support the basic founding principles of the American experiment.Would you say this division extends to the vast majority of the population or is it a loud minority? I ‘m asking because I don’t know.