Trump v GOP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abynissa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
GaryTaylor said:
Your not going to dictate theocracy to democrats overnight, thats not going to happen. What could happen is by large massive mitigation of hundreds of thousands of innocents via abortion and the unborn.

You would be no different than the democrats with that dictation of thinking. No different at all. Listen these are not bad people and we could mitigate this issue and work with these people while addressing the issues realistically. 🤷
Click to expand...
Wow Gary, you seem to be evolving quite nicely in your resoned approaches as to who the best candidate might be.

But I personally believe Romney would be much better mitigating this issue and others with “these people” than Trump would be.
But then that is one of the main reason he was crucified by a lot of conservatives last election. Was it not?
 
simple_soul said:
Wow Gary, you seem to be evolving quite nicely in your resoned approaches as to who the best candidate might be.

But I personally believe Romney would be much better mitigating this issue and others with “these people” than Trump would be.
But then that is one of the mane reason he was crucified by a lot of conservatives last election. Was it not?
Click to expand...
I just think we can stop all this devise nonsense and unite this country and mitigate the excessive wanton killing of the unborn. We have two sides in arrogant opposition. They don’t wont to kill 1-million of the unborn a year any more than the Republicans do. But they want access to abortion for various legitimate reasons. Thats very different than the hedonistic way of life we are in today, no-one is really promoting that but to take a hard headed stance in opposition to a hard headed stance. I’m suggesting we can mitigate the slaughter and live together out here.

Mitt Romney, I don’t agree with he seems to be contrary to the voice of we the people. He had his chance and his day passed. I think there are two good solid candidates with Trump and Cruz. I’m not sure Mitt would care for either, but his ship sailed.
 
GaryTaylor said:
I just think we can stop all this devise nonsense and unite this country and mitigate the excessive wanton killing of the unborn. We have two sides in arrogant opposition. They don’t wont to kill 1-million of the unborn a year any more than the Republicans do. But they want access to abortion for various legitimate reasons. Thats very different than the hedonistic way of life we are in today, no-one is really promoting that but to take a hard headed stance in opposition to a hard headed stance. I’m suggesting we can mitigate the slaughter and live together out here.

Mitt Romney, I don’t agree with he seems to be contrary to the voice of we the people. He had his chance and his day passed. I think there are two good solid candidates with Trump and Cruz. I’m not sure Mitt would care for either, but his ship sailed.
Click to expand...
You just got finished trouncing Cruz to seemingly lay a case for why Trump would be the better candidate. Now you seem to think Cruz is good? :confused:
 
simple_soul said:
You just got finished trouncing Cruz to seemingly lay a case for why Trump would be the better candidate. Now you seem to think Cruz is good? :confused:
Click to expand...
Im not trouncing either to be specific. I would vote for either in fact, I think Trump is more likely to win against Hillary and think Ted would best serve the country legally as vice president and I would prefer to have Trump doing the negotiating. I;m not even trouncing Mitt though his position is most divisive and unacceptable his thinking isn’t rooted in conservative principles. 🤷

That said I would definitely vote for Ted if that be the case. As I also stated he may change my mind in the days to come and become a much better candidate. Right now I think he;s too nice of a guy to send to a gun fight.
 
GaryTaylor said:
Im not trouncing either to be specific. I would vote for either in fact, I think Trump is more likely to win against Hillary and think Ted would best serve the country legally as vice president and I would prefer to have Trump doing the negotiating. I;m not even trouncing Mitt though his position is most divisive and unacceptable his thinking isn’t rooted in conservative principles. 🤷

That said I would definitely vote for Ted if that be the case. As I also stated he may change my mind in the days to come and become a much better candidate. Right now I think he;s too nice of a guy to send to a gun fight.
Click to expand...
Thank you so much for clarifying that. Now I can see clearer were you stand.🙂
 
GaryTaylor said:
I just think we can stop all this devise nonsense and unite this country and mitigate the excessive wanton killing of the unborn. We have two sides in arrogant opposition. They don’t wont to kill 1-million of the unborn a year any more than the Republicans do. But they want access to abortion for various legitimate reasons. Thats very different than the hedonistic way of life we are in today, no-one is really promoting that but to take a hard headed stance in opposition to a hard headed stance. I’m suggesting we can mitigate the slaughter and live together out here.

Mitt Romney, I don’t agree with he seems to be contrary to the voice of we the people. He had his chance and his day passed. I think there are two good solid candidates with Trump and Cruz. I’m not sure Mitt would care for either, but his ship sailed.
Click to expand...
“Wow, Gary” (as another poster stated) is right. Do you think a candidate praising the “wonderful” work PP does is something that helps STOP the wanton killing of the unborn? Or that any pro-life candidate would even praise PP? Yes, I agree we should unite - which is why you comments on this thread are very confusing to me. :confused:
 
randomuser said:
“Wow, Gary” (as another poster stated) is right. Do you think a candidate praising the “wonderful” work PP does is something that helps STOP the wanton killing of the unborn? Or that any pro-life candidate would even praise PP? Yes, I agree we should unite - which is why you comments on this thread are very confusing to me. :confused:
Click to expand...
They were confusing to me too but like he said his minds not made up and I believe that explains it.

On another note, regarding PP, they do offer other services and I do believe it is right to acknowledge the good they do but it does not excuse the bad, evil, things they do. But that should be applied to all of us.
 
simple_soul said:
Well maybe the first step in mitagating with these people is letting Hilary win the election.
After all they are good people.
Click to expand...
Maybe they should “let” us win unless your suggesting the republicans are not good people? I’m rather confused at what your saying at this junction?
 
GaryTaylor said:
Maybe they should “let” us win unless your suggesting the republicans are not good people? I’m rather confused at what your saying at this junction?
Click to expand...
Oh Gary, 🙂 with the mind gymnastics you have shown you can do I am sure you know very well what I’m saying. If not I am more than confident you can figure it out.😉
 
randomuser said:
“Wow, Gary” (as another poster stated) is right. Do you think a candidate praising the “wonderful” work PP does is something that helps STOP the wanton killing of the unborn? Or that any pro-life candidate would even praise PP? Yes, I agree we should unite - which is why you comments on this thread are very confusing to me. :confused:
Click to expand...
In contradiction again since yesterday I see you think your speaking for others which you reject? You never responded to that double standard yesterday but here you are again with it today. And WOW once again I fail to see where you have any point? This is somewhat correct…
On another note, regarding PP, they do offer other services and I do believe it is right to acknowledge the good they do but it does not excuse the bad, evil, things they do. But that should be applied to all of us.
Click to expand...
PP can be done away with for an alternative social service which could be googled. Most democrats I know have no issue with mitigating wanton killing but also acknowledge the the various services PP provides for women. In in depth conversation they also acknowledge alternatives to PP are logical and realistic. Now admittedly Trump is still meandering the point more indicative by the quote here, however he’s on the right track. Its not a matter of good and evil to them-democrats and thats not the path of any unity with them nor are we promoting a theocracy out here. We are respecting christian beliefs via separation of church and state without interference of state into church. Now if you have a point other than an emotional wow, you are certainly encouraged to articulate it here and we can charitably discuss it. Thus far you haven’t been capable of this. 🤷
 
GaryTaylor said:
In contradiction again since yesterday I see you think your speaking for others which you reject? You never responded to that double standard yesterday but here you are again with it today. And WOW once again I fail to see where you have any point? This is somewhat correct…

PP can be done away with for an alternative social service which could be googled. Most democrats I know have no issue with mitigating wanton killing but also acknowledge the the various services PP provides for women. In in depth conversation they also acknowledge alternatives to PP are logical and realistic. Now admittedly Trump is still meandering the point more indicative by the quote here, however he’s on the right track. Its not a matter of good and evil to them-democrats and thats not the path of any unity with them nor are we promoting a theocracy out here. We are respecting christian beliefs via separation of church and state without interference of state into church. Now if you have a point other than an emotional wow, you are certainly encouraged to articulate it here and we can charitably discuss it. Thus far you haven’t been capable of this. 🤷
Click to expand...
You fail to see where I have a point? Pro-life people don’t praise Planned Parenthood. Period, end of story, there’s nothing further for me to articulate nor do I have any obligation to articulate anything further since my obligation is to the unborn. Abortion is a non-negotiable: as in…non-negotiable, so no, I don’t see how I have been incapable of simply stating the obvious.
 
randomuser said:
You fail to see where I have a point? Pro-life people don’t praise Planned Parenthood. Period, end of story, there’s nothing further for me to articulate nor do I have any obligation to articulate anything further since my obligation is to the unborn. Abortion is a non-negotiable: as in…non-negotiable, so no, I don’t see how I have been incapable of simply stating the obvious.
Click to expand...
Yes please do not repeat that point any longer. Everybody knows what you are saying and what Trump has said.
 
randomuser said:
Pro-life people don’t praise Planned Parenthood. Period, end of story, .
Click to expand...
Your point is moot as no-one “praised” PP. Thus you start off on another logical fallacy. Agian you have no point in fact more nonsense. 😉
 
GaryTaylor said:
Your point is moot as no-one “praised” PP. Thus you start off on another logical fallacy. Agian you have no point in fact more nonsense. 😉
Click to expand...
What’s nonsensical is your continued dodging and evading the obvious:

Donald Trump Praises Planned Parenthood Again, Attacks “So-Called Conservatives” Who Disagree
lifenews.com/2016/03/01/donald-trump-praises-planned-parenthood-again-attacks-so-called-conservatives-who-disagree/

Perhaps you can articulate, with facts, how Trump has criticized PP since you seem to believe he hasn’t “praised” them? Facts, please - not emotions.
 
randomuser said:
What’s nonsensical is your continued dodging and evading the obvious:

Donald Trump Praises Planned Parenthood Again, Attacks “So-Called Conservatives” Who Disagree
lifenews.com/2016/03/01/donald-trump-praises-planned-parenthood-again-attacks-so-called-conservatives-who-disagree/

Perhaps you can articulate, with facts, how Trump has criticized PP since you seem to believe he hasn’t “praised” them? Facts, please - not emotions.
Click to expand...
he said he’s going to defund them as long as they do abortions. I guess that counts as a praise, too.

you are milking this too much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top