Trump v GOP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abynissa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But we’re not talking about the average person on the street. We’re talking about someone who should be knowledgeable enough to be president. The average American probably doesn’t know much about foreign affairs, either, but we better hope that our president does.
Good point. However, I doubt that Trump doesn’t know about David Duke and what he stands for. I heard Trump plead ignorance about Duke but the former is too smart to have no knowledge about him. Trump simply does not want to lose any of his constituents and he is concerned that some of them support Duke’s ideology.
 
Good point. However, I doubt that Trump doesn’t know about David Duke and what he stands for. I heard Trump plead ignorance about Duke but the former is too smart to have no knowledge about him. Trump simply does not want to lose any of his constituents and he is concerned that some of them support Duke’s ideology.
I could forgive not knowing who David Duke is. maybe but KKK he should know. Given his age he should know who that awful group is.
 
I could forgive not knowing who David Duke is. maybe but KKK he should know. Given his age he should know who that awful group is.
I’m younger than Trump by over 30 years and I know who David Duke is. I just can’t buy his feigned ignorance on this one.
 
I could forgive not knowing who David Duke is. maybe but KKK he should know. Given his age he should know who that awful group is.
Of course Trump knows about the KKK and I believe he is also familiar with the ideology of David Duke. The fact that he does know about them makes his refusal to reject Duke’s endorsement so bad. I will, however, give him the benefit of playing politics, poorly in this instance, rather than actually approving of Duke’s ideas.
 
Of course Trump knows about the KKK and I believe he is also familiar with the ideology of David Duke. The fact that he does know about them makes his refusal to reject Duke’s endorsement so bad. I will, however, give him the benefit of playing politics, poorly in this instance, rather than actually approving of Duke’s ideas.
There are somethings you shouldn’t be playing politics with. Trump has also been race baiting for a long time. If people don’t have the wisdom or clarity to recognize what this is I have no words.

Our country cannot and must not go down this road.
 
There are somethings you shouldn’t be playing politics with. Trump has also been race baiting for a long time. If people don’t have the wisdom or clarity to recognize what this is I have no words.

Our country cannot and must not go down this road.
It **must **not go down that road, but it lamentably can.

Is there a patron saint of elections who can offer guidance??

ICXC NIKA
 
Trump’s been in the public eye for 30+ years. I’m not sure how anybody can argue that he hasn’t been vetted. He’s been vetted more thoroughly than Rubio.
Rubio is out of his league, just giving Trump more ammo.

People don’t care about twitter spelling mistakes, but they do care about Senate voting attendance.
 
Meg Whitman, the CEO of Hewlett-Packard who had an official role with Gov. Chris Christie’s now-suspended presidential campaign, called his endorsement of Trump, “an astonishing display of political opportunism.”
Whitman served in the role of National Finance Co-Chair for Christie’s campaign.

“Trump would take America on a dangerous journey. Christie knows all that and indicated as much many times publicly,” Whitman wrote in a statement.

[More…]

cnbc.com/2016/02/28/christie-campaigns-finance-co-chair-calls-on-donors-to-reject-trump.html
 
Of course Trump knows about the KKK and I believe he is also familiar with the ideology of David Duke. The fact that he does know about them makes his refusal to reject Duke’s endorsement so bad. I will, however, give him the benefit of playing politics, poorly in this instance, rather than actually approving of Duke’s ideas.
The whole kkk thing is such a gotcha. Trump had already disavowed the endorsent twice. What more do people want?
 
The whole kkk thing is such a gotcha. Trump had already disavowed the endorsent twice. What more do people want?
😦

Some honesty pehaps?

It seems Trump gives me something daily as to why I should not vote for him because I can’t trust his word.
 
😦

Some honesty pehaps?

It seems Tump gives me something daily as to why I should not vote for him because I can’t trust his word.
Mainstream people can see clear as day what the media is trying to do. He already had disavowed it but they kept asking and asking. Trump is not kkk and who cares if they like him? Who cares?!

It’s not trump is giving you something every day. It’s the media and the establishment who tries something everyday to destroy him.
 
Mainstream people can see clear as day what the media is trying to do. He already had disavowed it but they kept asking and asking. Trump is not kkk and who cares if they like him? Who cares?!

It’s not trump is giving you something every day. It’s the media and the establishment who tries something everyday to destroy him.
He makes the media’s job easy when he tells lies like not knowing who David Duke is. Yes…it is Donald Trump who giving me something seemingly every day.

I have tried to warm up to Donald Trump. I have tried to buy into the idea that he perhaps is a changed man and has disavowed his liberal past and has now embraced conservative or at least Republican principles.

Then I’m reminded that yesterday morning he denied not knowing who David Duke is. And you’re trying to tell me that all is now right with the world of being able to trust this man posing as someone who’s convictions are as good as his word?
 
He makes the media’s job easy when he tells lies like not knowing who David Duke is. Yes…it is Donald Trump who giving me something seemingly every day.

I have tried to warm up to Donald Trump. I have tried to buy into the idea that he perhaps is a changed man and has disavowed his liberal past and has now embraced conservative or at least Republican principles.

Then I’m reminded that yesterday morning he denied not knowing who David Duke is. And you’re trying to tell me that all is now right with the world of being able to trust this man posing as someone who’s convictions are as good as his word?
I don’t know what happened with him knowing David duke or not. One article says that he condemned duke in 2000. So if he did that in 2000 already, what is the problem? Either way, this is a nothing burger cooked up by the media like many others. Mainstream people don’t care. Now if you have a tendency to dislike trump, then you’ve found more material. Suit yourself.
 
I don’t know what happened with him knowing David duke or not. One article says that he condemned duke in 2000. So if he did that in 2000 already, what is the problem?
His disavowal in 2000 contrasted with his ambivalence in 2016 makes him look craven and opportunistic–which he is, of course.
 
I don’t know what happened with him knowing David duke or not. One article says that he condemned duke in 2000. So if he did that in 2000 already, what is the problem? Either way, this is a nothing burger cooked up by the media like many others. Mainstream people don’t care. Now if you have a tendency to dislike trump, then you’ve found more material. Suit yourself.
My problem with Trump is that he changes position seemingly all the time. He obviously figures that changing his mind about something all the time is a winning strategy. He disavowed Duke in 2000, then denies even knowing who he is in 2016, then disavows him again.

I have a tendency not to trust candidates who are constantly changing.

Apparently you’re not bothered by anything that Trump says. Suit yourself.
 
His disavowal in 2000 contrasted with his ambivalence in 2016 makes him look craven and opportunistic–which he is, of course.
He has disavowed their endorsement now, at least twice. The media will keep asking and asking and asking until they get some kind of bombshell. Put yourself in that position and see if you can always please everyone.
 
My problem with Trump is that he changes position seemingly all the time. He obviously figures that changing his mind about something all the time is a winning strategy. He disavowed Duke in 2000, then denies even knowing who he is in 2016, then disavows him again.

I have a tendency not to trust candidates who are constantly changing.

Apparently you’re not bothered by anything that Trump says. Suit yourself.
Knowing about a person is not exactly the same as knowing someone. I can know about David Duke (which I don’t) and don’t really know him.

The fact of the matter is, Trump is not KKK and he’s not involved with David Duke in any way, shape or form. Why is that not enough to rest the issue?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top